BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Case Report Open Access
Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license. No commercial re-use. See permissions. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Clin Cases. May 16, 2026; 14(14): 120147
Published online May 16, 2026. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v14.i14.120147
When the atrium is not enough, ablation of anteroseptal focal atrial tachycardia from the non-coronary aortic cusp: A case report
Andrea Giuseppe Porto, Division of Cardiology, Cannizzaro Hospital, Catania 95021, Sicilia, Italy
Paolo Zappulla, Division of Cardiology, University Hospital a Policlinico “G.Rodolico-San Marco”, Catania 95123, Italy
Sergio Conti, Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Cardiac Electrophysiology, University of Iowa Health Care Center, Iowa, IA 52242, United States
Giuseppe Sgarito, Department of Cardiac Electrophysiology, IRCCS ISMETT-UPMC Heart Center, Institute for Transplantation and Advanced Specialized Therapies, Palermo 90127, Italy
ORCID number: Andrea Giuseppe Porto (0000-0002-6454-6665); Paolo Zappulla (0000-0001-5014-5353); Sergio Conti (0000-0001-6683-6781); Giuseppe Sgarito (0000-0001-6003-6054).
Author contributions: Porto AG and Sgarito G contributed to conceptualization; Porto AG and Zappulla P contributed to methodology and investigation; Porto AG contributed to writing, original draft preparation; Conti S and Sgarito G contributed to writing-review and editing.
Informed consent statement: Informed written consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this report and any accompanying images.
Conflict-of-interest statement: All the authors report no relevant conflicts of interest for this article.
CARE Checklist (2016) statement: The authors have read the CARE Checklist (2016), and the manuscript was prepared and revised according to the CARE Checklist (2016).
Corresponding author: Sergio Conti, MD, PhD, FHRS, FESC, Assistant Professor, Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Cardiac Electrophysiology, University of Iowa Health Care Center, 200 Hawkins Dr, Iowa, IA 52242, United States. sergioconti.md@gmail.com
Received: February 24, 2026
Revised: March 9, 2026
Accepted: March 31, 2026
Published online: May 16, 2026
Processing time: 70 Days and 2.6 Hours

Abstract
BACKGROUND

Adenosine-sensitive focal atrial tachycardias (AT) arising from the anteroseptal region are uncommon and may be difficult to ablate safely because of their proximity to the atrioventricular (AV) conduction system. Failure of conventional right or left atrial ablation should prompt consideration of alternative anatomical sites.

CASE SUMMARY

A 64-year-old caucasian man with no structural heart disease presented with recurrent adenosine-sensitive supraventricular tachycardia. Electrophysiological study demonstrated a long-RP focal AT with intermittent AV block and earliest activation in the anteroseptal right atrium. High-density mapping and radiofrequency (RF) applications in both atria were ineffective. Mapping of the aortic root identified the earliest atrial signal in the non-coronary cusp, 36 milliseconds before the surface P wave, with a negative unipolar electrogram. RF delivery at this site terminated the tachycardia, and additional consolidation lesions prevented recurrence. The arrhythmia was no longer inducible under isoproterenol. At 3-year follow-up, the patient remains asymptomatic without antiarrhythmic therapy.

CONCLUSION

The non-coronary cusp is a safe and effective ablation target for anteroseptal focal atrial tachycardia.

Key Words: Atrial tachycardia; Non-coronary aortic cusp; Catheter ablation; Para Hisian arrhythmia; Adenosine; Mapping; Case report

Core Tip: Anteroseptal focal atrial tachycardia may originate from tissue adjacent to or within the aortic root. When right and left atrial ablation is ineffective or hazardous, systematic mapping of the non coronary cusp can provide a safe and durable cure while minimizing the risk of atrioventricular block.



INTRODUCTION

Focal atrial tachycardia (AT) represents a minority of supraventricular tachycardias (SVT), counting for approximately 7% of all cases[1]. AT is most frequently encountered in specific regions of the atria such as the crista terminalis, coronary sinus, pulmonary veins, or atrial appendages[2,3]. AT is often challenging to diagnose based on clinical presentation and surface electrocardiogram (ECG). Different algorithms have been proposed to identify the origin of AT based on the analysis of the 12-lead ECG[2,3]. Tachycardias arising from the anterior or anteroseptal atrium are uncommon and often pose diagnostic and therapeutic challenges because of their proximity to the atrioventricular (AV) node and his bundle[4]. Adenosine sensitivity and the presence of intermittent AV block during tachycardia strongly support a focal atrial mechanism and help distinguish this entity from AV node–dependent reentrant tachycardias.

Several studies have suggested that para-Hisian ATs can be successfully ablated from the right or left atrial septum, or non-coronary cusp (NCC) in the aorta[5]. However, ablation from the right or left atrial septum may be ineffective or associated with an unacceptably high risk of conduction system injury. Previous studies have demonstrated that the NCC may harbor atrial myocardial extensions capable of sustaining atrial tachyarrhythmias[4-7]. For this reason, mapping and ablation in the NCC should be always considered in cases of AT originating from the His bundle region. However, conduction system injury have been also reported in catheter ablation of AT from the NCC[6]. We report a case of adenosine-sensitive anteroseptal focal AT successfully treated by radiofrequency (RF) ablation from the NCC after failed conventional atrial approaches.

CASE PRESENTATION
Chief complaints

Recurrent palpitations associated with general malaise for approximately three months.

History of present illness

The patient reported sudden-onset, regular palpitations occurring several times per week, often requiring presentation to the emergency department. Episodes were associated with mild dyspnea and fatigue but no syncope, chest pain or hemodynamic instability. Each documented episode was terminated by intravenous adenosine. The 12-lead ECG of the tachycardia is showed in Figure 1.

Figure 1
Figure 1 The electrocardiogram shows a 1:1 long RP tachycardia with a heart rate of 150 beats per minute. The atrial electrogram is biphasic in lead II and predominantly negative in lead III and aVF.
History of past illness

No history of cardiovascular disease, hypertension, diabetes, or prior arrhythmias.

Personal and family history

The patient was a Caucasian, 64-year-old male, normal weight, and non-smoker. There was no family history of arrhythmias or sudden cardiac death.

Physical examination

Blood pressure 125/75 mmHg; heart rate in sinus rhythm 80 beats per minute (bpm); oxygen saturation 98% on room air. Cardiovascular and respiratory examinations were unremarkable.

Laboratory examinations

Routine blood tests, electrolytes, renal, thyroid and hepatic function were within normal limits.

Imaging examinations

Transthoracic echocardiography showed normal cardiac chamber dimensions, preserved biventricular function, and no structural abnormalities.

FINAL DIAGNOSIS

Adenosine-sensitive focal AT originating from the anteroseptal region, successfully ablated from the non-coronary aortic cusp.

TREATMENT
Electrophysiological study

After informed consent, the patient was hence referred for an electrophysiological study and ablation. Baseline rhythm was sinus at 100 bpm with normal AV and infra-Hisian conduction: Atrial-Hisian 80 milliseconds, his-ventricle interval 50 milliseconds. Tachycardia was reproducibly induced with atrial programmed stimulation (Figure 2A). The P wave morphology during tachycardia was positive in lead I and aVL, biphasic in lead II, and predominantly negative in lead III and aVF. It exhibited a variable ventricle-atrial time and a cycle length of 370 milliseconds, with occasional episodes of AV block (Figure 2B). Ventricular overdrive pacing demonstrated AV dissociation without atrial entrainment, confirming a diagnosis of focal AT. The earliest atrial activation was initially recorded in the anterior/anteroseptal right atrium with proximal-to-distal coronary sinus activation. High-density electroanatomical mapping with pentaspline catheter revealed a broad area of early activation on the interatrial septum (max 29 milliseconds, Figure 2C), without a discrete focal point. His bundle electrograms were located approximately 8 mm from the region of earliest atrial activation. Left atrial mapping after transseptal puncture under fluoroscopic guidance did not demonstrate earlier activation. Multiple RF applications at 35 W, 30 seconds each in the right anteroseptal atrium failed to terminate the arrhythmia.

Figure 2
Figure 2 Electrophysiological-related research. A: Induction of atrial tachycardia by programmed electrical stimulation with sensed premature atrial complexes; B: Phase of transient atrioventricular block during atrial tachycardia; C: Earliest signal from the right side of the atrial septum, with an anticipation of 29 milliseconds to the beginning to the P wave; D: Earliest signal detected from the non-coronary cusp, with an anticipation of 36 milliseconds to the beginning of the P wave.
Ablation strategy and treatment

Given the close anatomical relationship between the anteroseptal right atrium and the aortic root, mapping was extended to the aortic bulb via femoral arterial access. The earliest atrial electrogram was identified at the NCC, preceding the surface P wave by 36 milliseconds (Figure 2D). RF energy (35-40 W, 60 seconds) delivered at this site resulted in immediate termination of the tachycardia, as shown in Video 1. After isoproterenol infusion, the arrhythmia was transiently inducible, and three additional consolidation lesions were applied in the same region. Figure 3 shows the merged electroanatomical mapping of right atrium, left atrium and aortic root, and the tags of ablation spots from the aortic NCC are highlighted in blue and white.

Figure 3
Figure 3 Electroanatomical mapping of the right atrium, left atrium and aortic root. Activation mapping shows the earliest propagation of signals from the non-coronary cusp, which is anatomically and functionally in close proximity with the right side of the interatrial septum.
OUTCOME AND FOLLOW-UP

After the final ablation, tachycardia was no longer inducible, even under high-dose isoproterenol infusion. No AV conduction disturbances or vascular complications occurred. The patient was discharged without antiarrhythmic medication. During a follow-up period of three years, the patient remained asymptomatic with no documented recurrence of tachycardia.

DISCUSSION

Focal AT is the least common SVT. AT may be difficult to distinguish from other narrow-complex tachycardias. Differential diagnosis is crucial to establishing the proper treatment. AT may have specific characteristics, such as “warm-up” and “cool-down” phases, which are uncommon in other SVT and may help differentiate it. In addition, conducting a thorough electrophysiological study is mandatory to establish the final diagnosis. Recognizing the A-A-V electrogram response following cessation of ventricular overdrive pacing (VAAV response), especially during tachycardia with 1:1 ventricular-atrial conduction. Another characteristic of AT is the variability in tachycardia cycle length, particularly changes of 15 milliseconds or more that predict ventricular cycle length changes, may indicate AT. Finally, AT can be excluded as the underlying mechanism of burst pacing consistently terminates the tachycardia without affecting atrial activation[8].

This case illustrates several important diagnostic and therapeutic aspects of anteroseptal focal AT. First, adenosine sensitivity and intermittent AV block during tachycardia strongly indicated a focal atrial mechanism, excluding typical AV nodal reentry or accessory pathway–mediated tachycardia[9]. Second, although the earliest activation was recorded in the right anteroseptal atrium, ablation at this site was ineffective. This finding supports the concept that some para-hisian tachycardias originate from intramural tissue or from atrial myocardium adjacent to extracardiac structures, particularly the aortic root[4]. Anatomically, the NCC lies in close proximity to the AV septum and the anteroseptal right atrium. Embryologically, remnants of atrial myocardium may persist within this region and serve as an arrhythmogenic substrate. These features explain why the NCC can be a critical site for both mapping and ablation of para-Hisian AT[4]. Several series have reported acute success rates exceeding those of right or left atrial septal approaches, with a low incidence of complications[5,6,10-12]. Ablation from the NCC offers additional advantages, including improved catheter stability and a greater safety margin from the compact AV node and his bundle. In summary, this case confirms that when conventional atrial ablation is unsuccessful or potentially hazardous, systematic mapping of the NCC should be considered early in the management of anteroseptal focal AT.

CONCLUSION

The NCC should be considered a first-line or early alternative ablation target for adenosine-sensitive anteroseptal focal AT, particularly when atrial septal ablation is ineffective or carries a high risk of AV block.

References
1.  Roberts-Thomson KC, Kistler PM, Kalman JM. Focal atrial tachycardia II: management. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2006;29:769-778.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 31]  [Cited by in RCA: 24]  [Article Influence: 1.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
2.  Qian ZY, Hou XF, Xu DJ, Yang B, Chen ML, Chen C, Zhang FX, Shan QJ, Cao KJ, Zou JG. An algorithm to predict the site of origin of focal atrial tachycardia. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2011;34:414-421.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 17]  [Cited by in RCA: 16]  [Article Influence: 1.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
3.  Kistler PM, Chieng D, Tonchev IR, Sugumar H, Voskoboinik A, Schwartz LA, McLellan AJ, Prabhu S, Ling LH, Al-Kaisey A, Parameswaran R, Anderson RD, Lee G, Kalman JM. P-Wave Morphology in Focal Atrial Tachycardia: An Updated Algorithm to Predict Site of Origin. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2021;7:1547-1556.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 2]  [Cited by in RCA: 27]  [Article Influence: 5.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
4.  Markowitz SM. What Is the Optimal Approach to Ablation of Para-Hisian Atrial Tachycardias? JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2016;2:200-202.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 5]  [Cited by in RCA: 2]  [Article Influence: 0.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
5.  Lyan E, Toniolo M, Tsyganov A, Rebellato L, Proclemer A, Manfrin M, Nechepurenko A, Morozov A, Abdrahmanov A, Gromyko G, Lyashenko V, Yakovleva M. Comparison of strategies for catheter ablation of focal atrial tachycardia originating near the His bundle region. Heart Rhythm. 2017;14:998-1005.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 18]  [Cited by in RCA: 23]  [Article Influence: 2.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
6.  Barkagan M, Michowitz Y, Glick A, Tovia-Brodie O, Rosso R, Belhassen B. Atrial Tachycardia Originating in the Vicinity of the Noncoronary Sinus of Valsalva: Report of a Series Including the First Case of Ablation-Related Complete Atrioventricular Block. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2016;39:1165-1173.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 9]  [Cited by in RCA: 11]  [Article Influence: 1.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
7.  Pap R, Makai A, Szilágyi J, Klausz G, Bencsik G, Forster T, Sághy L. Should the Aortic Root Be the Preferred Route for Ablation of Focal Atrial Tachycardia Around the AV Node?: Support From Intracardiac Echocardiography. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2016;2:193-199.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 15]  [Cited by in RCA: 14]  [Article Influence: 1.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
8.  Knight BP, Zivin A, Souza J, Flemming M, Pelosi F, Goyal R, Man C, Strickberger SA, Morady F. A technique for the rapid diagnosis of atrial tachycardia in the electrophysiology laboratory. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1999;33:775-781.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 224]  [Cited by in RCA: 178]  [Article Influence: 6.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
9.  Liu CF, Cheung JW, Ip JE, Thomas G, Yang H, Sharma S, Markowitz SM, Lerman BB. Unifying Algorithm for Mechanistic Diagnosis of Atrial Tachycardia. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2016;9:e004028.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 20]  [Cited by in RCA: 22]  [Article Influence: 2.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
10.  Kriatselis C, Roser M, Min T, Evangelidis G, Höher M, Fleck E, Gerds-Li H. Ectopic atrial tachycardias with early activation at His site: radiofrequency ablation through a retrograde approach. Europace. 2008;10:698-704.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 21]  [Cited by in RCA: 14]  [Article Influence: 0.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
11.  Das S, Neuzil P, Albert CM, D'Avila A, Mansour M, Mela T, Ellinor PT, Singh J, Patton K, Ruskin JN, Reddy VY. Catheter ablation of peri-AV nodal atrial tachycardia from the noncoronary cusp of the aortic valve. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2008;19:231-237.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 52]  [Cited by in RCA: 45]  [Article Influence: 2.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
12.  Ouyang F, Ma J, Ho SY, Bänsch D, Schmidt B, Ernst S, Kuck KH, Liu S, Huang H, Chen M, Chun J, Xia Y, Satomi K, Chu H, Zhang S, Antz M. Focal atrial tachycardia originating from the non-coronary aortic sinus: electrophysiological characteristics and catheter ablation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;48:122-131.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 131]  [Cited by in RCA: 118]  [Article Influence: 5.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
Footnotes

Peer review: Externally peer reviewed.

Peer-review model: Single blind

Specialty type: Cardiac and cardiovascular systems

Country of origin: United States

Peer-review report’s classification

Scientific quality: Grade A, Grade B

Novelty: Grade B, Grade B

Creativity or innovation: Grade B, Grade B

Scientific significance: Grade B, Grade B

P-Reviewer: Malik S, PhD, Professor, Researcher, Pakistan S-Editor: Liu H L-Editor: A P-Editor: Lei YY