Copyright
©The Author(s) 2018.
World J Clin Cases. Mar 16, 2018; 6(3): 27-34
Published online Mar 16, 2018. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v6.i3.27
Published online Mar 16, 2018. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v6.i3.27
Figure 1 Fractured maxillary central incisors.
Figure 2 Fractured mandibular central incisors.
Figure 3 Polyethylene fibre posts in the root canals.
Figure 4 Zirconia-rich glass fibre posts in the root canals.
Figure 5 Polyethylene fibre post and direct resin composite restorations (maxillary lateral incisors were restored using the direct composite laminate technique).
Figure 6 Zirconia-rich glass fibre posts and direct resin composite restorations.
Figure 7 Maxillary right central incisor with marginal staining and maxillary left central incisor with partial loss of restoration.
- Citation: Ayna B, Ayna E, Çelenk S, Başaran EG, Yılmaz BD, Tacir İH, Tuncer MC. Comparison of the clinical efficacy of two different types of post systems which were restored with composite restorations. World J Clin Cases 2018; 6(3): 27-34
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v6/i3/27.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v6.i3.27