Ayna B, Ayna E, Çelenk S, Başaran EG, Yılmaz BD, Tacir İH, Tuncer MC. Comparison of the clinical efficacy of two different types of post systems which were restored with composite restorations. World J Clin Cases 2018; 6(3): 27-34 [PMID: 29564355 DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v6.i3.27]
Corresponding Author of This Article
Mehmet Cudi Tuncer, PhD, Full Professor, Department of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine, Dicle University, Fabrika mahallesi, 760. sokak, Sunrise 2 Evleri, E Blok, Kat.3, No.9, Diyarbakır 21280, Turkey. drcudi@hotmail.com
Research Domain of This Article
Medicine, Research & Experimental
Article-Type of This Article
Prospective Study
Open-Access Policy of This Article
This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA
Share the Article
Ayna B, Ayna E, Çelenk S, Başaran EG, Yılmaz BD, Tacir İH, Tuncer MC. Comparison of the clinical efficacy of two different types of post systems which were restored with composite restorations. World J Clin Cases 2018; 6(3): 27-34 [PMID: 29564355 DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v6.i3.27]
World J Clin Cases. Mar 16, 2018; 6(3): 27-34 Published online Mar 16, 2018. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v6.i3.27
Comparison of the clinical efficacy of two different types of post systems which were restored with composite restorations
Buket Ayna, Emrah Ayna, Sema Çelenk, Emine Göncü Başaran, Berivan Dündar Yılmaz, İbrahim Halil Tacir, Mehmet Cudi Tuncer
Buket Ayna, Sema Çelenk, Department of Pedodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Dicle University, Diyarbakır 21280, Turkey
Emrah Ayna, Emine Göncü Başaran, Berivan Dündar Yılmaz, İbrahim Halil Tacir, Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Dicle University, Diyarbakır 21280, Turkey
Mehmet Cudi Tuncer, Department of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine, Dicle University, Diyarbakır 21280, Turkey
Author contributions: Ayna B, Ayna E and Çelenk S were responsible for the study design, data analysis, andmanuscript preparation; Yılmaz BD wrote the paper; Ayna B and Çelenk S performed endodontic treatment; Ayna E, Başaran EG and Yılmaz BD carried out evalation of the stability and lifespan of the restorations Ayna E, Tacir İH were prepared teeth; Tuncer MC were responsible for data collection and manuscript preparation.
Institutional review board statement: The study is registered at Department of Prosthodontics, Dental Faculty Hospital Trial Registry (PRO-3258/2010-13; Patient follow-up software system).
Clinical trial registration statement: The study is registered at Department of Prosthodontics, Dental Faculty Hospital trial registry (Patient follow-up software).
Informed consent statement: All the treatment procedures were performed after obtaining the informed consent in writing from the patients.
Conflict-of-interest statement: All authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest and nothing to declare.
Data sharing statement: No additional data are available.
Correspondence to: Mehmet Cudi Tuncer, PhD, Full Professor, Department of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine, Dicle University, Fabrika mahallesi, 760. sokak, Sunrise 2 Evleri, E Blok, Kat.3, No.9, Diyarbakır 21280, Turkey. drcudi@hotmail.com
Received: December 21, 2017 Peer-review started: December 21, 2017 First decision: January 3, 2018 Revised: January 5, 2018 Accepted: February 4, 2018 Article in press: February 4, 2018 Published online: March 16, 2018 Processing time: 82 Days and 19.4 Hours
ARTICLE HIGHLIGHTS
Research background
Zircon and fiber posts are preferred to metal posts with esthetic and economic disadvantages. Metal posts are long term unsuccessful because it is mechanically bonded to root dentin. Esthetic posts are long-term successful by bonding dentine adhesives.
Research motivation
Long term clinical survival of esthetic posts remains controversial. Also zircon and polyethylene fiber posts with composite restorations are not often preferred. If there has been excessive crown damage it is good alternative.
Research objectives
Clinical survival of both posts is the same, indicating the importance of adhesive bonding. Future research should aim at increasing the adhesive bonding.
Research methods
Esthetic post and core was stated to the anterior teeth with endodontic treatment. Then, it was restored by composite restorations. Clinical survival of both esthetic posts were evaluated in 36 mo periods.
Research results
Clinical survival of both posts is the same. There were no statistically different between post systems.
Research conclusions
Esthetic post systems were successful the long-term clinical survival. It should preferred to metal posts. Direct composite restorations can preferred to the ceramic restorations. This materials provide esthetic, functional and economic advantages.
Research perspectives
Future research should focus on comparing composite to ceramic restorations. Also such as ceramic, hybrid ceramic and peek materials were added in the research.
