Case Report
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Clin Cases. Sep 26, 2025; 13(27): 108923
Published online Sep 26, 2025. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v13.i27.108923
Figure 1
Figure 1 Computed tomography images of the pelvic cavity mass. A: Coronal section without contrast; B: Sagittal section without contrast; C: Axial section without contrast; D: Coronal section with contrast enhancement; E: Sagittal section with contrast enhancement; F: Axial section with contrast enhancement.
Figure 2
Figure 2  Imaging of the mass after decompression treatment, showing reduced size and structural changes.
Figure 3
Figure 3  The mass, removed from the abdominal cavity and positioned externally, exhibits prominent surface vascular engorgement.
Figure 4
Figure 4  The blue arrow denotes the normal-sized uterus, and the yellow arrow identifies the normal ovarian tissue.
Figure 5
Figure 5 The tumor size and weight were further confirmed using a ruler and a weighing scale after resection. A: Tumor size; B: Tumor weight.
Figure 6
Figure 6  The incised tumor revealed features suggestive of cystic degeneration.
Figure 7
Figure 7 Postoperative histopathological examination of leiomyoma with hematoxylin–eosin staining at 200 × magnification. A: Disorganized bundles of smooth muscle fibers showing a chaotic arrangement; B: Smooth muscle bundles with interstitial hemorrhage, demonstrated by red blood cells present between muscle fibers.
Figure 8
Figure 8 Postoperative immunohistochemical examination showing typical caldesmon expression and Ki-67 proliferation index. A: Typical positive staining for caldesmon; B: Ki-67 immunostaining showing approximately 1% positivity.