Copyright
©The Author(s) 2020. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
World J Clin Cases. Oct 6, 2020; 8(19): 4311-4319
Published online Oct 6, 2020. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v8.i19.4311
Published online Oct 6, 2020. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v8.i19.4311
Transanal minimally invasive surgery vs endoscopic mucosal resection for rectal benign tumors and rectal carcinoids: A retrospective analysis
Jia-Men Shen, Jia-Ying Zhao, Tao Ye, Li-Feng Gong, Hui-Peng Wang, Wen-Jie Chen, Yuan-Kun Cai, Department of General Surgery, Shanghai Fifth People’s Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200240, China
Author contributions: Shen JM designed and performed the research and wrote the manuscript; Zhao JY and Ye T designed the research and contributed to the analysis; Gong LF, Wang HP and Chen WJ provided clinical advice; Cai YK designed the research and supervised the report.
Supported by the Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipally , No. 17411967600 .
Institutional review board statement: This study was reviewed and approved by the Ethics Committee of the 5th People’s Hospital of Shanghai, Fudan University.
Informed consent statement: Patients were not required to give informed consent to the study because the analysis used anonymous clinical data that were obtained after each patient agreed to treatment by written consent.
Conflict-of-interest statement: We have no financial relationships to disclose.
Open-Access: This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Corresponding author: Yuan-Kun Cai, MD, Associate Professor, Chief Doctor, Department of General Surgery, Shanghai Fifth People’s Hospital, Fudan University, No. 801 Heqing Road, Shanghai 200240, China. 18918168583@163.com
Received: April 4, 2020
Peer-review started: April 4, 2020
First decision: June 18, 2020
Revised: July 1, 2020
Accepted: August 29, 2020
Article in press: August 29, 2020
Published online: October 6, 2020
Processing time: 176 Days and 9.1 Hours
Peer-review started: April 4, 2020
First decision: June 18, 2020
Revised: July 1, 2020
Accepted: August 29, 2020
Article in press: August 29, 2020
Published online: October 6, 2020
Processing time: 176 Days and 9.1 Hours
Core Tip
Core Tip: This is a retrospective study aiming to compare the short-term outcomes of transanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS) and endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) for rectal neoplasms. The surgical-related outcomes and postoperative complication rates in 44 patients who received TAMIS and 53 patients who received EMR were compared. The results showed that the EMR group was associated with longer operating time and higher lesion fragmentation rate, while the TAMIS group had lower postoperative hemorrhage and reoperation rates.