Published online Nov 6, 2022. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i31.11325
Peer-review started: June 24, 2022
First decision: September 2, 2022
Revised: September 13, 2022
Accepted: September 27, 2022
Article in press: September 27, 2022
Published online: November 6, 2022
Processing time: 124 Days and 23.3 Hours
Patients with cirrhosis have an increased risk of developing esophageal cancer due to the same risk factor for alcohol consumption, and the management of early esophageal cancer in cirrhotic patients continues to be a vexing problem.
Endoscopic submucosal tunnel dissection (ESTD) is a modification of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), which provides a clear visual field and sufficient operative space through the submucosal tunnel, thus, ESTD has the potential to reduce the incidence of intraoperative hemorrhage, perforation and muscular injury compared with ESD in general patients. However, data on the safety and effectiveness of the esophageal ESTD in cirrhotic patients remain unclear.
To evaluate the feasibility, safety, efficacy and long-term survival outcomes of ESTD in treating early esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (EESCC) in patients with cirrhosis.
This was a retrospective cohort study. We analyzed the clinical data of 590 EESCC patients who underwent ESTD from a large-scale tertiary hospital. After excluding 25 patients with unclear lesion areas or pathological results, the remaining 565 patients were matched at a ratio of 1:3 by using propensity score matching. A total of 25 EESCC patients with comorbid liver cirrhosis and 75 matched EESCC patients were ultimately included in the analysis. Parametric and nonparametric statistical methods were used to compare the differences between the two groups. The Kaplan–Meier method was used to create survival curves, and differences in survival curves were compared by the log-rank test.
We found intraoperative bleeding (P = 0.234), 30-day post-ESTD bleeding (P = 0.099), disease-specific survival (P = 0.075), and recurrence-free survival (P = 0.8196) in the cirrhosis group compared to the noncirrhosis group. The mean hospitalization time and costs was significantly longer (P = 0.007) and the costs were significantly higher (P = 0.023) in the cirrhosis group than in the noncirrhosis group. The overall survival rate was significantly lower in the cirrhosis group (P = 0.001).
ESTD is technically feasible, safe, and effective for patients with EESCC and liver cirrhosis. EESCC patients with Child-Pugh A disease seem to be good candidates for ESTD.
Prospective studies are necessary to assess the validity of ESTD in treating EESCC patients with liver cirrhosis.