Published online Sep 6, 2020. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v8.i17.3679
Peer-review started: January 3, 2020
First decision: January 18, 2020
Revised: May 15, 2020
Accepted: August 1, 2020
Article in press: August 1, 2020
Published online: September 6, 2020
Processing time: 244 Days and 14.9 Hours
There are no studies on incidental anal 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18FDG) uptake.
To assess the rate and aetiologies of incidental anal 18FDG uptake and to evaluate the correlation between 18FDG positron-emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) parameters and the diagnosis of an anorectal disease.
The data from patients with incidental anal 18FDG uptake were retrospectively analysed. Patients who underwent anorectal examinations were identified and compared to those who did not undergo examinations. Patients who were offered treatment were then identified and compared to those who did not receive treatment.
Among the 43020 18FDG PET/CT scans performed, 197 18FDG PET/CT scans of 146 patients (0.45%) reported incidental anal uptake. Among the 134 patients included, 48 (35.8%) patients underwent anorectal examinations, and anorectal diseases were diagnosed in 33 (69.0%) of these patients and treated in 18/48 (37.5%) patients. Among the examined patients, those with a pathology requiring treatment had significantly smaller metabolic volumes (MV) 30 and MV41 values and higher maximal and mean standardized uptake value measurements than those who did not require treatment.
Incidental anal 18FDG uptake is rare, but a reliable anorectal diagnosis is commonly obtained when an anorectal examination is performed. The diagnosis of an anorectal disease induces treatment in more than one-third of the patients. These data should encourage practitioners to explore incidental anal 18FDG uptake systematically.
Core tip: This is a retrospective study to assess the rate and aetiologies of incidental anal 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18FDG) uptake and to evaluate the correlation between 18FDG positron-emission tomography/computed tomography parameters and the diagnosis of an anorectal disease. Incidental anal 18FDG uptake is rare, but a reliable anorectal diagnosis is commonly obtained when an anorectal examination is performed. The diagnosis of an anorectal disease induces treatment in more than one-third of the patients. These data should encourage practitioners to explore incidental anal 18FDG uptake systematically.
