Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2024. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
World J Clin Cases. Jul 6, 2024; 12(19): 3785-3790
Published online Jul 6, 2024. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v12.i19.3785
Effect of nursing intervention on rehabilitation of patients with chronic sinusitis and nasal polyps after nasal endoscopy
Hui Xu, Miao Pan, Lin Zhu
Hui Xu, Miao Pan, Lin Zhu, Department of Otolaryngology, The First People’s Hospital of Jiangxia District, Wuhan 430200, Hubei Province, China
Co-first authors: Hui Xu and Miao Pan.
Author contributions: Xu H, Pan M, and Zhu L designed the research; Pan M contributed new reagents/analytic tools; Zhu L analyzed the data; Xu H and Pan M wrote the paper. Xu H and Pan M contributed equally to this work as co-first authors. The reasons for designating Xu H and Pan M as co-first authors are threefold. First, the research was performed as a collaborative effort, and the designation of co-first authorship accurately reflects the distribution of responsibilities and burdens associated with the time and effort required to complete the study and the resultant paper. This also ensures effective communication and management of post-submission matters, ultimately enhancing the paper's quality and reliability. Second, the overall research team encompassed authors with a variety of expertise and skills from different fields, and the designation of co-first authors best reflect this diversity. This also promotes the most comprehensive and in-depth examination of the research topic, ultimately enriching readers' understanding by offering various expert perspectives. Third, Xu H and Pan M contributed efforts of equal substance throughout the research process. The choice of these researchers as co-first authors acknowledges and respects this equal contribution, while recognizing the spirit of teamwork and collaboration of this study. In summary, we believe that designating Hui Xu and Miao Pan as co-first authors is fitting for our manuscript as it accurately reflects our team's collaborative spirit, equal contributions, and diversity.
Institutional review board statement: This study protocol was approved by The first People’s Hospital of Jiangxia District, and all the families have voluntarily participated in the study and have signed informed consent forms.
Informed consent statement: All study participants or their legal guardian provided informed written consent about personal and medical data collection prior to study enrolment.
Conflict-of-interest statement: The authors declared no conflict of interest existing in this paper.
Data sharing statement: Technical appendix, statistical code, and dataset available from the corresponding author at A159Sunny@126.com. Participants gave informed consent for data sharing.
Open-Access: This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: https://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Corresponding author: Lin Zhu, BM BCh, Department of Otolaryngology, The First People’s Hospital of Jiangxia District, No. 1 Wenhua Avenue, Jiangxia District, Wuhan 430200, Hubei Province, China. a159sunny@126.com
Received: March 14, 2024
Revised: April 30, 2024
Accepted: May 20, 2024
Published online: July 6, 2024
Processing time: 106 Days and 20 Hours
Abstract
BACKGROUND

Chronic sinusitis is a kind of chronic suppurative inflammation of the sinus mucosa. Nasal endoscopy is a good method to treat nasal polyps. However postoperative rehabilitation and care should not be neglected.

AIM

To investigate the Effect of nursing intervention on the rehabilitation of patients with chronic sinusitis and nasal polyps (CSNPS) after nasal endoscopy.

METHODS

A total of 129 patients with CSNPS hospitalized from February 2017 to February 2019 were studied. Using the digital parity method, we investigated nursing cooperation strategies for endoscopic surgery. The comparison group (64 cases): Surgical nursing was carried out with traditional nursing measures; experimental group (65 cases): Surgical nursing was carried out by traditional nursing countermeasures + comprehensive nursing measures. We compared postoperative recovery rates, nursing satisfaction rates, and nasal cavity ratings between the two groups.

RESULTS

Experimental group patients with CSNPS had a significantly higher recovery rate (98.46%) compared to the control group (79.69%). This difference was statistically significant (χ2 = 11.748, P < 0.05). Additionally, the satisfaction rate with treatment was also significantly higher in the experimental group (98.46%) compared to the control group (79.69%), with a statistically significant difference (χ2 = 11.748, P < 0.05). Before nursing, there was no significant difference in sinus nasal cavity scores between the experimental group (20.29 ± 7.25 points) and the control group (20.30 ± 7.27 points) (t = 0.008, P > 0.05). However, after nursing, the sinus nasal cavity score in the experimental group (8.85 ± 3.22 points) was significantly lower than that in the control group (14.99 ± 5.02 points) (t = 8.282, P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Comprehensive nursing intervention in patients with CSNPS can significantly improve the total recovery rate after endoscopic surgery.

Keywords: Chronic sinusitis; Nasal polyps; Endoscopic surgery; Comprehensive nursing; Clinical effect

Core Tip: In this study, we studied the nursing effect of endoscopic surgery in patients with nasal polyps and sinusitis. A total of 129 patients in our hospital were selected and divided into two groups. The control group was given routine nursing and the experimental group was given comprehensive nursing based on routine nursing. The results showed that the experimental group's postoperative recovery rate, nursing satisfaction, and nasal test score were better than the control group.