Copyright
©The Author(s) 2026.
World J Methodol. Mar 20, 2026; 16(1): 112686
Published online Mar 20, 2026. doi: 10.5662/wjm.v16.i1.112686
Published online Mar 20, 2026. doi: 10.5662/wjm.v16.i1.112686
Table 1 Applied healing topical statin delivery systems
| Ref. | System |
| Salem et al[6], 2022 | Silver-capped hydrogel |
| Aboelazayem et al[13], 2025 | Nano sponges |
| Abu El Hawa et al[21], 2022 | Transethosomal gels |
| Jull et al[22], 2022 | Cubosomal nanoparticles |
| Patel et al[23], 2024 | Film-forming sprays |
| Janipour et al[18], 2023; Heydari et al[24], 2022; Rahamathulla et al[25], 2024 | Biological scaffolds (chitosan-based matrices and peptide-loaded hydrogels) |
| Yu et al[26], 2020; Rezvanian et al[27], 2021 | Rosuvastatin with mesenchymal stem cells |
Table 2 Efficacy of statins on burn wound healing
| Ref. | Subjects | Model | Intervention | Groups | Effects |
| Ramhormozi et al[91], 2021 | 60 male Wistar rats | Wistar rats (2nd° burn) | Topical SMV in paraffin | SMV-Veh, RM, RM + SMV, RM-Veh | Activated protein kinase B/mammalian target of rapamycin signaling pathway |
| Mohajer Ansari et al[84], 2020 | 48 male Wistar rats | Wistar rats (deep partial burn) | Topical SMV ± BMSCs | Petroleum jelly, BMSCs, SMV | Improved wound closure, epithelial thickness, collagen remodeling |
| Hosny et al[92], 2020 | 57 + 15 adult rats (2 stages) | Adult rats | Topical SMV formulations | 5-formulation: W/wo SMV, oleic acid, saline, dispersion | Reduced wound diameter, lower interleukin-6 with SMV-coconut oil |
| Boyko et al[95], 2020 | 48 burn patients | Burn patients | Oral atorvastatin | Atorvastatin, control | No adverse effects; safe in burns, effective |
| Akershoek et al[87], 2017 | 4 female pigs | Pigs (partial/full burn) | Oral atorvastatin/Losartan | No treatment, atorvastatin, losartan | Faster transition to proliferative phase; resolved myofibroblasts |
| Zhao et al[93], 2013 | C57BL/6 male mice (approximately 70–90 total) | C57BL/6 mice (30% TBSA burn) | IP SMV ± inhibitors/KO | Sham, burn + saline, burn + SMV, tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitor/caspase-3, KO ± SMV | Reduced apoptosis via tumor necrosis factor-α/caspase-3 suppression |
| Beffa et al[94], 2011 | 48 male CD-1 mice | CD-1 mice (30% TBSA burn) | IP SMV | Placebo, SMV q12h, q24h | Improved survival at 24 hours and 72 hours (P < 0.01) |
Table 3 Efficacy of rosuvastatin on wound healing in recent experimental studies
| Ref. | Subjects | Intervention | Groups | Outcome |
| Santana et al[1], 2025 | 8 male New Zealand rabbits | Dermal wounds, RSV gel, autologous PRP 32 biopsies | The autologous PRP, RSV, PRP + RSV, control | PRP + RSV has higher collagen I than control |
| Marneri et al[2], 2024 | 36 male Wistar rats | Burn trauma, RSV topical | RSV, control (placebo) | RSV higher fibroblast proliferation, angiogenesis, re-epithelization, lower tumor necrosis factor-α, procalcitonin |
| Zaki et al[5], 2022 | 30 male Wistar rats | Skin wounds RSV transe-hosomal | Silver sulp-hadiazine RSV-loaded gel control | Nanovesicles enhanced wound healing |
| Salem et al[6], 2022 | 30 female Wistar rats | Skin wounds | RSV nano-cubics 16 mg plus RSV 1.4 mg/g hydrogel alone RSV or AgNPs or gentamicin control | Biogel RSV plus AgNPs enhanced wound healing |
- Citation: Marneri AG, Pavlidis ET, Stavrati KE, Mouratidou C, Kotoulas SC, Ballas KD, Pavlidis TE. Effects of rosuvastatin treatment and other statins on burn wound healing. World J Methodol 2026; 16(1): 112686
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2222-0682/full/v16/i1/112686.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5662/wjm.v16.i1.112686
