Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Virol. Sep 25, 2025; 14(3): 108405
Published online Sep 25, 2025. doi: 10.5501/wjv.v14.i3.108405
Published online Sep 25, 2025. doi: 10.5501/wjv.v14.i3.108405
Table 1 Clinical manifestations of Lassa fever
Stage | Duration | Symptoms | Description |
Incubation period | Days 2-21 | Typical asymptomatic | Virus is replicating; no external signs |
Early stage | Days 1-6 | Fever, sore throat, muscle aches, chest pain, vomiting, diarrhea | Resembles malaria or typhoid; diagnostic confusion common |
Progression to severe | Days 7-14 | Facial swelling, mucosal bleeding, pleural/pericardial effusion, hypotension, respiratory distress | Indicates systemic involvement and vascular leakage |
Neurological phase | Advanced (≥ day 10) | Confusion, seizures, encephalopathy | May progress to multiorgan failure |
Complications | Variable | Hearing loss (up to 30% of survivors), myocarditis, chronic fatigue, spontaneous abortion (pregnancy) | Hearing loss may be permanent; pregnant females are at very high risk |
Case fatality risk | Severe cases | 15%-20% in hospitalized patients | Higher in late-presenting cases and pregnant females |
Recovery phase | After 2-3 weeks | Weakness, fatigue, dizziness, depression | Long recovery; some may need audiological or psychological follow-up |
Table 2 Diagnostic techniques for Lassa fever
Method | Type | Sample | Turnaround time | Advantages | Limitations |
Reverse transcription PCR | Molecular | Blood or tissue | Few hours | Highly sensitive and specific; early detection | Requires specialized labs and trained personnel |
ELISA (IgM, IgG, antigen) | Serological | Serum or plasma | 1-2 days | Useful for acute and retrospective diagnosis | Limited sensitivity in early stages |
Virus isolation | Culture (definitive) | Blood or tissue | Several days | Confirmatory; research reference standard | Requires Biosafety Laboratory-4 facility; high biosafety risk |
Next-generation sequencing | Genomic surveillance | Blood or tissue | Variable | Tracks evolution and strain diversity | Expensive and technology-intensive |
Rapid diagnostic tests | Immunochromatography | Blood sample | 15-30 min | Fast, suitable for remote settings | Still under development and validation |
Supportive laboratory indicators | Clinical chemistry | Blood, urine | Few hours | Suggestive (e.g., elevated aspartate aminotransferase, thrombocytopenia) | Not confirmatory; supportive only |
Table 3 Treatment and management strategies for Lassa fever
Component | Objective | Key interventions |
Antiviral therapy | Inhibit viral replication | Intravenous ribavirin (ideally within first 6 days); oral ribavirin for mild or remote settings |
Supportive care | Stabilize and support vital functions | Intravenous fluids and electrolyte balance; nutritional support; oxygen therapy; antipyretics; blood transfusions |
Severe case management | Manage complications and prevent multiorgan failure | Antibiotics for secondary infections; dialysis for renal failure; ventilation support; seizure control |
Pregnancy-specific care | Reduce maternal and fetal mortality | Specialized obstetric care; consider therapeutic abortion in advanced pregnancy with severe infection |
Post-recovery care | Promote long-term recovery and quality of life | Audiology screening and support; psychological counseling; physical rehabilitation and follow-up |
Table 4 Prevention and control strategies for Lassa fever
Level | Key strategies |
Community level | Promote hygiene and rodent-proof food storage; educate communities through culturally appropriate materials; improve waste management practices; discourage handling and consumption of rodents |
Healthcare level | Mandate personal protective equipment use; ensure patient isolation; train healthcare workers in infection prevention; sterilize equipment; provide obstetric care for pregnant females |
National level | Strengthen disease surveillance; expand laboratory networks; integrate Lassa fever control into national health policies; ensure emergency preparedness |
International level | Support cross-border data sharing; invest in vaccine and therapeutic research; collaborate with global health organizations (e.g., World Health Organization, Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations); improve access to rapid diagnostics and antivirals |
Table 5 Overview of Lassa fever vaccine candidates: Platforms, clinical stages, and immune responses
Vaccine platform | Stage | Immune response | Protection (models) |
VSV-based (VSVΔG -LASVGPC) | Phase I/II | Strong humoral and T cell | Guinea pigs, NHPs |
Reassortant ML29 | Preclinical | IgG, IFN-γ T cells | Guinea pigs, NHPs |
DNA-based (INO-4500) | Phase I | IgG, neutralizing Abs | Guinea pigs, NHPs |
Measles virus vector (MV-LASV) | Phase I | CD4/CD8 T cells, IgG | NHPs |
Vaccinia virus vector | Preclinical | Mixed | Guinea pigs, NHPs |
ChAdOx1 adenovirus vector | Preclinical | T cell and IgG | Mice, Guinea pigs |
mRNA-based | Preclinical | Fc-mediated + T cell | Guinea pigs, mice |
Yellow fever 17D vector | Preclinical | IgG | Guinea pigs |
VEEV RNA replicon | Preclinical | T cell mediated | Guinea pigs |
Rabies virus vector | Preclinical | ADCC, IgG | Guinea pigs, NHPs |
Protein nanoparticle | Preclinical | Neutralizing Abs | Guinea pigs |
Virus-like particles | Preclinical | Neutralizing Abs | Rabbits |
Table 6 Comparative overview of Marburg, Ebola and Lassa viruses
Feature | MARV | EBOV | Lassa virus |
Virus family | Filoviridae | Filoviridae | Arenaviridae |
First identified outbreak | 1967: Marburg and Frankfurt, Germany and Belgrade, Serbia | 1976: Yambuku, Democratic Republic of the Congo and Nzara, Sudan | 1969: Lassa, Nigeria |
Origin of outbreaks | African green monkeys imported from Uganda | Suspected zoonotic transmission with bats as reservoirs and transmission to humans or other primates | Contact with Mastomys natalensis rodents |
Reservoir hosts | Egyptian fruit bat (Rousettus aegyptiacus) suspected | Fruit bats (Pteropodidae family), particularly Eidolon helvum | Multimammate rats (Mastomys natalensis) |
Case fatality rate | 24%-90%, depending on outbreak and case management | 25%-90%, depending on outbreak and case management | 1% overall; up to 15%-20% in hospitalized patients; higher in pregnant females |
Geographic distribution | Primarily sub-Saharan Africa | Primarily sub-Saharan Africa | West Africa: Nigeria, Sierra Leone, Liberia, Guinea, others |
Symptoms | Hemorrhagic fever, severe malaise, high fever, vomiting, diarrhea, organ dysfunction | Similar to MARV: Hemorrhagic fever, malaise, vomiting, diarrhea, multiorgan failure | Fever, sore throat, vomiting, bleeding, neurological complications |
Transmission | Direct contact with bodily fluids (e.g., blood, saliva, urine) of infected persons or animals | Direct contact with bodily fluids of infected persons or animals, contaminated surfaces | Exposure to rodent excreta; human-to-human via body fluids |
Laboratory diagnosis | PCR, ELISA, virus isolation | PCR, ELISA, virus isolation | PCR, ELISA (IgM, IgG), virus isolation |
Vaccines | No approved vaccine (research ongoing) | Approved vaccines available (e.g., recombinant vesicular stomatitis virus-ZEBOV for Zaire strain) | No approved vaccine (clinical trials ongoing) |
Notable outbreaks | Angola (2004-2005), Democratic Republic of the Congo (1998-2000) | West Africa (2014-2016), Democratic Republic of the Congo (multiple outbreaks) | Nigeria (multiple outbreaks annually), Sierra Leone epidemics |
- Citation: Uppala PK, Karanam SK, Kandra NV, Edhi S. Lassa fever: A comprehensive review of virology, clinical management, and global health implications. World J Virol 2025; 14(3): 108405
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2220-3249/full/v14/i3/108405.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5501/wjv.v14.i3.108405