Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Transplant. Dec 18, 2025; 15(4): 104589
Published online Dec 18, 2025. doi: 10.5500/wjt.v15.i4.104589
Published online Dec 18, 2025. doi: 10.5500/wjt.v15.i4.104589
Table 1 Definition of alcohol-associated hepatitis recommended by the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism
| Items | |
| 1 | Onset of jaundice in the previous 8 weeks |
| 2 | Continuous alcohol consumption of > 40 (female) or > 60 (male) g/day for at least 6 months, with less than 60 days of abstinence before the onset of jaundice |
| 3 | Aspartate aminotransferase > 50, aspartate aminotransferase/alanine aminotransferase > 1.5, and both values less than 400 IU/L |
| 4 | Serum bilirubin (total) > 3.0 mg/dL |
| 5 | Liver biopsy confirmation in patients (macrovesicular steatosis, hepatocyte ballooning, and predominantly neutrophilic infiltration and Mallory-Denk bodies) |
| Exclusion of other liver disease (i.e., viral hepatitis, autoimmune liver diseases, Wilson disease, drug-induced liver injury, hepatocellular carcinoma) |
Table 2 Studies to date examining early-liver transplantation for alcohol-associated hepatitis
| Ref. | Location | Study format | Early LT candidacy criteria | n | Primary outcome | Survival rate | Relapse rate |
| Im et al, 2016[61] | United States | Retrospective | Mathurin et al[28] criteria (see Table 3). Inclusion of patients with recent infection and gastrointestinal bleeding | 18 | 6-month patient survival or early LT | 6 months patient: 89% (early LT) vs 11% (no LT at 6 months, matched controls; P < 0.001) | Any alcohol relapse: 25% among early LT group |
| Lee et al, 2017[32] | United States | Retrospective | Mathurin et al[28] criteria (see Table 3). Inclusion of patients with previous diagnosed but adequately managed mental health disorder. Inclusion of patients with recent infection and gastrointestinal bleeding | 43 | 3-year patient survival and alcohol relapse | 6 months patient: 100% (early LT) vs 88.5% (standard LT; P = 0.27). No significant difference in patient survival (P = 0.922) between early- and standard LT over 3 years | Any alcohol relapse: 23.5% (early LT) vs 29.2% (standard LT; P > 0.99). Alcohol relapse with harmful patterns: 23.5% (early LT) vs 11.5% (standard LT; P = 0.42) |
| Weeks et al, 2018[33] | United States | Retrospective | Mathurin et al[28] criteria (see Table 3). Inclusion of patients with previous diagnosed but adequately managed mental health disorder. Inclusion of patients with recent infection and gastrointestinal bleeding | 80 | 1-year patient and graft survival. 1-year alcohol relapse rate | 1 year patient: 97% (early LT) vs 100% (standard LT; P = 1.00). 1 year graft: 93% (early LT) vs 89% (standard LT; P = 0.70). No significant difference in patient (P = 0.60) and graft (P = 0.80) survival rate between early- and standard LT over 5 years | Any alcohol relapse: 28% (early LT) vs 24% (standard LT; P = 0.80). Alcohol relapse with harmful patterns: 17% (early LT) vs 12% (standard LT; P = 0.50) |
| Lee et al, 2018[29] | United States | Retrospective | Mathurin et al[28] criteria (see Table 3). The ACCELERATE-AH multi-center trial | 147 | 1- and 3-year patient survival after early LT. Any alcohol use after early LT | 1 year patient: 94% (95%CI: 89%-97%); 3 years patient: 84% (95%CI: 75%-90%) | Any alcohol relapse: 25% (95%CI: 18%-34%) at 1-year and 34% (95%CI: 25%-44%) at 3-years post-early LT |
| Herrick-Reynolds et al, 2021[31] | United States | Retrospective | NIAA criteria (see Table 1) | 163 | 3-year patient, allograft, relapse-free, hazardous relapse-free survival | 1 year patient: 94.1% (early LT) vs 95.9% (standard LT; P = 0.60). 3 years patient: 83.0% (early LT) vs 78.6% (standard LT; P = 0.60). 1 year allograft: 92.7% (early LT) vs 90.5% (standard LT; P = 0.42). 3 years allograft: 81.7% (early LT) vs 74.7% (standard LT; P = 0.42) | Early LT no association with relapse (HR = 0.77, 95%CI: 0.42-1.42, P = 0.41. adjusted HR = 0.87, 95%CI: 0.46-1.63, P = 0.66). Early LT no association with hazardous relapse (HR = 0.74, 95%CI: 0.36-1.51, P = 0.41. Adjusted HR = 0.88. 95%CI: 0.42-1.86. P = 0.74). Younger age (21-30 years) associated with relapse (HR = 5.60, 95%CI: 1.32-23.68, P = 0.02) and hazardous relapse (HR = 6.92, 95%CI: 1.53-31.32, P = 0.01) |
| Germani et al, 2022[62] | Italy | Retrospective | Mathurin et al[28] criteria (see Table 3). Inclusion of patients with previous diagnosed but adequately managed mental health disorder. Inclusion of patients with recent infection and gastrointestinal bleeding | 93 | 3-year patient survival rate | 6-, 12-, 24, 36-month patient survival in early LT patients (100% across all points) significantly higher than patients that are non-responders to medical therapy and denied LT (41%, 41%, 38% and 35% respectively; log-rank P < 0.001). 6-, 12-, 24, 36-month patient survival in early LT patients (100% across all points) significantly higher than patients who are responders to medical therapy (77%, 67%, 65% and 55% respectively; log-rank P = 0.008) | Any alcohol relapse: 12% among early LT group |
| Carrique et al, 2021[30] | Canada | Retrospective | NIAA criteria (see Table 1). Inclusion of patients with decompensated ALD without SAH. Includes "intensive relapse prevention therapy" in early LT patients | 155 | 2-year patient survival | 30 days patient: 95.5% (early LT; 95%CI: 83.0%-98.8%) vs 97.3% (standard LT; 95%CI: 91.7%-99.1%). 6 months patient: 88.6% (early LT; 95%CI: 74.8%-95.1%) vs 96.3% (standard LT; 95%CI: 90.4%-98.6%). 1 year patient: 88.6% (early LT; 95%CI: 74.8-95.1%) vs 96.3% (standard LT; 95%CI: 90.4%-98.6%). 2 years patient: 88.6% (early LT; 95%CI: 74.8%-95.1%) vs 94.1% (standard LT; 95%CI: 87.3%-97.3%) | 6.8% of early LT patients vs 16% of standard LT patients returned to alcohol use after transplant (P = 0.21) |
| Louvet et al, 2022[35] | France-Belgium | Prospective | Mathurin et al[28] criteria (see Table 3). Additional scoring criteria by study team (≥ 220 points = early LT) | 161 | Non-inferiority of the 2-year rate of alcohol relapse in the early LT group vs standard LT group. | 24 months patient: 89.7% (early LT) vs 88.2% (standard LT; HR = 0.87, 95%CI: 0.33-2.26). 24 months patient: 70.6% (early LT) vs 28.3% (non-eligible for early LT; HR = 0.27, 95%CI: 0.16-0.47) | 24 months: 34% (early LT) vs 25% (standard LT; Absolute difference = 9.1%, 95%CI: -∞ to 21.1, P = 0.45); non-inferiority of early LT for alcohol relapse not proven |
| Musto et al, 2024[60] | United States | Retrospective | NIAA criteria (see Table 1) | 334 | 10-year patient adjusted survival in early LT, standard LT and non-ALD diagnoses | 10 years patient: early LT (referent) vs standard LT (adjusted HR = 1.31, 95%CI: 0.79-2.17; P = 0.30) | 10 years: Early LT (referent) vs standard LT (adjusted HR = 1.47, 95%CI: 0.88-2.45, P = 0.14) |
| 10 years patient: Early LT (referent) vs non-ALD (adjust HR = 1.68, 95%CI: 0.79-2.78, P = 0.04) |
Table 3
Mathurin et al[29] inclusion criteria for early liver transplantation in alcohol-associated hepatitis patients
| Severe alcohol-associated hepatitis is defined as follows | |
| 1 | DF > 32 |
| 2 | Non-response to medical therapy: Lille score > 0.45 after 7 days of medical treatment or continued increase in MELD score |
| 3 | Severe AH as the first liver-decompensating event |
| 4 | Presence of supportive family structure |
| 5 | Absence of psychiatric co-morbidities |
| 6 | Agreement by patients to lifelong total alcohol abstinence |
| 7 | Complete consensus for early LT by multidisciplinary team |
Table 4 Psychosocial assessment scores for liver transplant candidacy and risk of alcohol recidivism
| Scoring system | Method | Risk factors measured |
| PACT (1989) | 8-item exam; Rated on 5-point scale; Final independent score given to rater's overall impression of candidates' acceptability of a transplant | Knowledge and receptiveness to education; Compliance with medical treatment; Drug and alcohol use; Healthy lifestyle habits and sustainable practices; Risk for psychopathology; Psychopathology, stable personality factors; Family/support system stability |
| MAPS (1990) | 12-item exam; Items vary from yes/no questions and scaled items; Final score assesses risk of alcohol relapse | Acceptance of alcoholism; Prognostic indices; Social stability |
| PLS (1991) | 7-item exam; 3-point scale; Final score examines psychological vulnerability | Past psychiatric history; Quality of family/social support; Prior coping history; Coping with disease/treatment, ability to anticipate problems; Quality of affect; Mental status |
| TERS (1993) | 10-item exam; 3-point scale; Final score indicates functioning level | Prior psychiatric history; Substance abuse; Compliance; Health behaviors; Quality of social support; Prior coping history |
| HRAR (1993) | 3-item exam; Each item stratified into 3 groups of varying severity; Single score given based on risk of alcoholism | Duration of heavy drinking in years; Number of drinks per day; Number of prior alcoholism inpatient hospitalizations |
| SIPAT (2012) | 18-item exam; 4 psychosocial themes evaluated; Varying number of questions for each theme ranging from 3-5 questions; Final score determines risk of candidates for transplantation | Patient's readiness level and illness management; Social support system level of readiness; Psychological stability and psychopathology; Lifestyle and effect of substance use |
| ARRA (2013) | 9-item exam; Final score determines placement into 1 of 4 groups (ARRA I-IV) based on rates of post LT alcohol use | Presence of hepatocellular carcinoma; Tobacco, alcohol dependent; Motivation for alcohol treatment, stress management skills; Rehabilitation, social support status, nonmedical behaviors, amount of alcohol in social activities |
| HPSS (2017) | 11-item exam; 3-point scale; post-hoc analysis of patients with severe alcoholic hepatitis vs alcoholic cirrhosis with > 6 months of abstinence; Final score shows risk of alcohol relapse after transplant | Self-admission to hospital; drinks/day prior to period of abstinence; Insight to diagnosis; Marital status; Abstinence before transplant; Psychiatric comorbidity; History of other substance use; History of failed rehabilitation attempt; Family history of alcoholism; Employment status prior to hospitalization; Alcohol-related legal history |
| SALT (2018) | Machine learning technique through the multi-center, ACCELERATE-AH cohort; Outcome of interest was sustained alcohol use post LT | Drinks per day at initial hospitalization; Multiple prior rehabilitation attempts; Prior alcohol-related legal issues; Prior illicit substance abuse |
| HALT (2020) | Retrospective review obtained of liver transplant patients; Final score predicts risk of alcohol relapse after transplant | Age at liver transplant; Non-alcohol related criminal history; Pre-transplant abstinence period; Drinks per day |
- Citation: Jung J, Hasjim BJ, Chen A, Hussain F, Rohan V, Ladner DP, Cheung A. Early liver transplant for alcohol-associated liver disease: Current state and future directions. World J Transplant 2025; 15(4): 104589
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2220-3230/full/v15/i4/104589.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5500/wjt.v15.i4.104589
