Published online Dec 18, 2025. doi: 10.5500/wjt.v15.i4.106444
Revised: March 30, 2025
Accepted: April 18, 2025
Published online: December 18, 2025
Processing time: 265 Days and 6 Hours
Single-ventricle congenital heart disease often requires the Fontan procedure, which can lead to Fontan-associated liver disease (FALD) and multi-organ failure. Combined heart-liver transplantation (CHLT) is a potential lifesaving option for these patients.
To investigate the outcomes and complications of CHLT in patients with failing Fontan physiology.
Seven retrospective studies of 121 patients undergoing CHLT were systematically reviewed. Quality was assessed with the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. A meta-analysis using random-effects models to calculate odds ratios (ORs) or mean differences (MDs) with 95% confidence intervals.
The pooled 30-day, 1-year, 5-year, and 10-year survival rates after CHLT were 92.6%, 86.78%, 81.17%, and 77.8%, respectively. The mean intensive care unit and total hospital lengths of stay were 8.46 and 28.16 days. Mean ischemic time was 267.29 minutes, while cardiopulmonary bypass time was 260.27 minutes. Infections (30%), renal replacement therapy (36.84%), and graft rejection (12.34%) were notable complications. Compared to orthotopic heart transplantation (OHT), CHLT significantly reduced mortality (OR: 0.30, P = 0.009) and ischemic time (MD: –65.93 minutes), with no major differences in perioperative morbidity.
CHLT offers a survival advantage over OHT for patients with FALD and failing Fontan physiology. Future prospective studies are warranted to refine eligibility and improve long-term survival.
Core Tip: This systematic review analyzes outcomes and complications associated with combined heart-liver transplantation (CHLT) in patients with failing Fontan physiology, a condition resulting from single-ventricle congenital heart disease palliated by the Fontan procedure. CHLT demonstrates a survival advantage over isolated heart transplantation, with significantly lower mortality and shorter ischemic times, while maintaining comparable perioperative outcomes. The findings emphasize the importance of multidisciplinary care, careful patient selection, and surgical expertise. Future prospective studies are needed to refine selection criteria and improve long-term survival in this high-risk population.
