BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Retrospective Study
Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Psychiatry. Apr 19, 2026; 16(4): 115520
Published online Apr 19, 2026. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v16.i4.115520
Table 1 Comparison of basic demographic characteristics between two groups, n (%)
Characteristic
Poisoning group (n = 28)
Normal group (n = 222)
χ2 value
P value
Age group7.4520.024
    12-14 years5 (17.9)72 (32.4)
    15-16 years6 (21.4)64 (28.8)
    17-18 years17 (60.7)86 (38.7)
Gender9.1270.002
    Male6 (21.4)114 (51.4)
    Female22 (78.6)108 (48.6)
Educational level4.0060.045
    Middle school9 (32.1)116 (52.3)
    High school19 (67.9)106 (47.7)
Specific grade distribution12.3840.015
    7th grade2 (7.1)38 (17.1)
    8th grade3 (10.7)42 (18.9)
    9th grade4 (14.3)36 (16.2)
    10th grade6 (21.4)38 (17.1)
    11th grade8 (28.6)36 (16.2)
    12th grade5 (17.9)32 (14.4)
Table 2 Clinical characteristics of antidepressant poisoning in poisoning group, n (%)/mean ± SD
Clinical characteristic
Poisoning group (n = 28)
Drug type
    SSRI class17 (60.7)
    SNRI class7 (25.0)
    Tricyclic class4 (14.3)
Dosage taken
    < 3 times therapeutic dose4 (14.3)
    3-5 times therapeutic dose6 (21.4)
    ≥ 5 times therapeutic dose18 (64.3)
Presentation time
    < 2 hours5 (17.9)
    2-6 hours20 (71.4)
    > 6 hours3 (10.7)
Poisoning severity
    Mild16 (57.1)
    Moderate9 (32.1)
    Severe3 (10.7)
Main clinical symptoms
    Nausea and vomiting25 (89.3)
    Dizziness and headache22 (78.6)
    Somnolence19 (67.9)
    Palpitations15 (53.6)
    Consciousness disorder8 (28.6)
    Convulsions3 (10.7)
Treatment regimen
    Gastric lavage + activated charcoal24 (85.7)
    Symptomatic supportive treatment28 (100.0)
    Blood purification3 (10.7)
    Mechanical ventilation2 (7.1)
Cause of poisoning
    Suicidal intent23 (82.1)
    Accidental poisoning3 (10.7)
    Drug abuse2 (7.1)
Past history
    Psychiatric disease history20 (71.4)
    Antidepressant medication use history18 (64.3)
    Previous suicide attempt history7 (25.0)
    Other chronic disease history5 (17.9)
Abnormal laboratory findings
    Liver function abnormalities12 (42.9)
    ECG abnormalities16 (57.1)
    Electrolyte disorders8 (28.6)
    Hospital stays (days)4.3 ± 2.2
Table 3 Comparison of family structure characteristics between two groups (points), mean ± SD
FSCQ dimension
Poisoning group (n = 28)
Normal group (n = 222)
95%CI
t value
P value
Family integrity8.4 ± 2.810.4 ± 2.3-3.3 to -0.7-3.9420.002
Family size7.1 ± 2.28.2 ± 1.7-1.9 to -0.3-2.8910.004
Economic status9.8 ± 3.212.6 ± 2.8-4.2 to -1.4-4.862< 0.001
Living environment8.9 ± 2.611.5 ± 2.2-3.6 to -1.6-5.521< 0.001
Care pattern10.4 ± 2.912.6 ± 2.4-3.4 to -1.0-4.289< 0.001
FSCQ total score44.6 ± 8.655.3 ± 7.4-14.1 to -7.3-5.874< 0.001
Table 4 Comparison of family function status between two groups (points), mean ± SD
FACES-II dimension
Poisoning group (n = 28)
Normal group (n = 222)
95%CI
t value
P value
Cohesion
    Actual feelings36.7 ± 10.249.2 ± 8.6-16.4 to -8.6-6.784< 0.001
    Ideal condition58.7 ± 8.262.4 ± 7.8-7.3 to -0.1-2.3590.019
    Ideal-actual difference22.0 ± 8.113.2 ± 5.44.9-12.76.195< 0.001
Adaptability
    Actual feelings39.4 ± 9.146.7 ± 7.9-10.8 to -3.8-4.462< 0.001
    Ideal condition56.2 ± 7.958.9 ± 8.1-5.8 to 0.4-1.7350.084
    Ideal-actual difference16.8 ± 7.212.2 ± 4.72.4-6.83.742< 0.001
Table 5 Comparison of parental mental health status between two groups (points), mean ± SD
SCL-90 dimension
Poisoning group (n = 28)
Normal group (n = 222)
95%CI
t value
P value
Somatization20.1 ± 5.916.2 ± 4.51.8-6.0-3.724< 0.001
Obsessive-compulsive17.2 ± 5.213.6 ± 3.91.8-5.4-3.892< 0.001
Interpersonal sensitivity15.1 ± 4.611.9 ± 3.41.6-4.8-3.921< 0.001
Depression25.4 ± 7.618.6 ± 5.44.2-9.4-5.082< 0.001
Anxiety21.8 ± 6.915.4 ± 4.64.1-8.7-5.421< 0.001
Hostility12.4 ± 4.19.1 ± 3.11.8-4.8-4.523< 0.001
Phobia13.6 ± 4.810.6 ± 3.31.4-4.6-3.582< 0.001
Paranoia11.2 ± 3.78.7 ± 2.81.3-3.7-3.841< 0.001
Psychoticism16.1 ± 5.413.1 ± 4.21.1-4.9-3.1670.002
SCL-90 total score172.5 ± 38.2132.7 ± 30.226.5-53.1-6.021< 0.001
Table 6 Comparison of parental rearing patterns between two groups (points), mean ± SD
EMBU dimension
Poisoning group (n = 28)
Normal group (n = 222)
95%CI
t value
P value
Father version
    Emotional warmth and understanding42.3 ± 9.853.1 ± 8.4-14.4 to -7.2-6.142< 0.001
    Punishment and strictness24.8 ± 6.718.6 ± 5.43.8-8.65.128< 0.001
    Excessive interference28.4 ± 7.221.8 ± 6.73.9-9.34.829< 0.001
    Favoring subjects14.1 ± 3.912.6 ± 3.40.1-2.92.1260.035
    Rejection and denial22.7 ± 6.116.9 ± 4.93.6-8.05.284< 0.001
    Overprotection32.8 ± 7.928.4 ± 7.21.5-7.33.0180.003
Mother version
    Emotional warmth and understanding46.7 ± 10.155.3 ± 8.8-12.4 to -4.8-4.721< 0.001
    Excessive interference and overprotection37.2 ± 8.431.6 ± 7.42.7-8.53.728< 0.001
    Rejection and denial24.3 ± 6.519.2 ± 5.62.7-7.54.382< 0.001
    Punishment and strictness20.9 ± 5.816.8 ± 4.72.0-6.23.951< 0.001
    Favoring subjects13.7 ± 3.811.9 ± 3.20.7-2.92.6340.009
Table 7 Comparison of family stress events and social support between two groups (points), mean ± SD
Scale and dimension
Poisoning group (n = 28)
Normal group (n = 222)
95%CI
t value
P value
LES total score35.6 ± 11.818.9 ± 8.612.5-20.97.962< 0.001
LES dimensions
Family life13.2 ± 4.27.2 ± 3.24.5-7.58.094< 0.001
Work and study12.8 ± 3.96.8 ± 2.94.6-7.48.752< 0.001
Social and others9.6 ± 3.54.9 ± 2.83.4-6.07.428< 0.001
SSRS total score29.4 ± 7.241.2 ± 7.9-15.2 to -8.4-7.924< 0.001
SSRS dimensions
Objective support9.1 ± 3.112.6 ± 3.2-4.7 to -2.3-5.712< 0.001
Subjective support12.4 ± 3.816.9 ± 4.1-6.2 to -2.8-5.831< 0.001
Utilization of support7.9 ± 2.311.7 ± 2.6-4.8 to -2.8-7.841< 0.001
Table 8 Comparison of adolescent mental health status between two groups, mean ± SD/n (%)
Indicator
Poisoning group (n = 28)
Normal group (n = 222)
95%CI
Statistical value
P value
CES-D score (points)29.8 ± 8.412.8 ± 6.213.8-20.2t = 11.246< 0.001
SAS standard score (points)56.3 ± 9.138.2 ± 7.614.8-21.4t = 10.928< 0.001
Depressive symptoms detection27 (96.4)32 (14.4)χ2 = 76.842< 0.001
Obvious depressive symptoms detection25 (89.3)18 (8.1)χ2 = 103.672< 0.001
Anxiety symptoms detection26 (92.9)28 (12.6)χ2 = 87.461< 0.001
Obvious anxiety symptoms detection22 (78.6)15 (6.8)χ2 = 89.527< 0.001
Table 9 Comparison of adolescent academic stress and life events between two groups (points), mean ± SD
ALES dimension
Poisoning group (n = 28)
Normal group (n = 222)
95%CI
t value
P value
Academic stress15.9 ± 4.211.2 ± 3.83.2-6.26.184< 0.001
Interpersonal relationships13.8 ± 3.99.6 ± 3.22.8-5.66.024< 0.001
Punishment12.1 ± 3.58.7 ± 2.92.2-4.65.428< 0.001
Loss10.4 ± 3.07.4 ± 2.81.9-4.15.291< 0.001
Health adaptation11.8 ± 3.48.2 ± 3.12.4-4.85.682< 0.001
Others12.8 ± 3.87.2 ± 2.94.2-7.08.264< 0.001
ALES total score76.8 ± 16.452.3 ± 14.618.4-30.68.129< 0.001
Table 10 Comparison of adolescent empathy ability between two groups (points), mean ± SD
IRI dimension
Poisoning group (n = 28)
Normal group (n = 222)
95%CI
t value
P value
Cognitive empathy
    Perspective taking16.8 ± 4.619.6 ± 4.2-4.6 to -1.0-3.3690.005
    Fantasy18.6 ± 4.418.9 ± 4.3-1.9 to 1.3-0.3620.718
    Cognitive empathy total35.4 ± 7.238.5 ± 6.9-6.1 to -0.1-2.2980.043
Emotional empathy
    Empathic concern17.6 ± 4.719.4 ± 4.5-3.7 to 0.1-2.0290.103
    Personal distress19.2 ± 4.813.7 ± 4.63.7-7.36.129< 0.001
    Emotional empathy total36.8 ± 7.933.1 ± 7.21.6-5.82.6270.021
    IRI total score72.2 ± 11.471.6 ± 10.2-4.0 to 5.20.2950.768
Table 11 Comparison of adolescent stress coping patterns between two groups (points), mean ± SD
CSQ dimension
Poisoning group (n = 28)
Normal group (n = 222)
95%CI
t value
P value
Mature coping
    Problem solving10.52 ± 0.190.68 ± 0.22-0.24 to -0.08-3.9420.001
Immature coping
    Self-blame0.61 ± 0.220.31 ± 0.190.22-0.387.584< 0.001
    Fantasy0.58 ± 0.210.34 ± 0.200.16-0.326.124< 0.001
    Immature coping total1.19 ± 0.320.65 ± 0.280.43-0.659.284< 0.001
Negative coping
    Withdrawal0.59 ± 0.240.28 ± 0.170.23-0.397.418< 0.001
Mixed coping
    Help-seeking10.39 ± 0.200.42 ± 0.18-0.10 to 0.04-0.8120.418
    Rationalization0.46 ± 0.180.48 ± 0.21-0.08 to 0.04-0.5110.610
    Mixed coping total0.85 ± 0.270.90 ± 0.26-0.15 to 0.05-0.9930.322
Table 12 Multivariate logistic regression analysis of influencing factors for adolescent antidepressant poisoning
Influencing factor
B value
SE
Wald value
P value
OR value
95%CI
Gender (female)1.0460.5224.0210.0452.8471.024-7.913
CES-D score0.1170.02916.284< 0.0011.1241.062-1.190
FSCQ total score-0.0680.0247.9510.0050.9340.891-0.979
Parental SCL-90 total score0.0180.0077.4420.0061.0181.005-1.031
SSRS total score-0.1110.03311.2850.0010.8950.839-0.955