BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Retrospective Study
Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Psychiatry. Apr 19, 2026; 16(4): 114215
Published online Apr 19, 2026. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v16.i4.114215
Table 1 Outcome and changes in Beck Depression Inventory raw score
Patient
BDI: Change scores
BDI: End-of-treatment scores
BDI: Baseline scores
1-14.007.0021.00
2-34.000.0034.00
3-21.003.0024.00
4-19.0011.0030.00
5-7.0010.0017.00
6-37.000.0037.00
7-24.0012.0036.00
8-17.000.0017.00
9-21.001.0022.00
10-3.0027.0030.00
11-29.006.0035.00
12-8.009.0017.00
13-18.000.0018.00
mean n = 1319.396.6226.00
Table 2 Psychoanalytic Core Competency Q-Sort scales with correlation to changes in Beck Depression Inventory scores
Characteristic
Attitude
Framework
Interventions
Enactment
BDI-change score
Correlation-0.2820.203-0.5770.383
Significance0.3750.5270.050.219
Table 3 Outcome in affect regulation and psychic functioning
Affect regulation
Value
Effect sizes
Affect experienceFactor 1: Socialized negative affectZ = -1.149Not significant-
P value = 0.251
Factor 2: Positive affectZ = -2.176Significantr = 0.60
P value = 0.030
Factor 3: Intense negative affectZ = -2.060Significantr = 0.57
P value = 0.039
Affect regulationFactor 4: Reality focused responseZ = -1.029Not significant-
P value = 0.304
Factor 5: Externalizing defenseZ = -2.952Significantr = 0.82
P value = 0.003
Factor 6: Avoidant defenseZ = -0.134Not significant-
P value = 0.894
Table 4 Before-after comparison of the Psychoanalytic Core Competency subdimensions
Characteristic
P value

Effect sizes
Attitude before/afterP value = 0.797Not significant-
Framework before/afterP value = 0.045Significantr = 0.56
Interventions before/afterP value = 0.003Significantr = 0.76
Enactment before/afterP value = 0.086Not significant-