BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Observational Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Psychiatry. Oct 19, 2025; 15(10): 111286
Published online Oct 19, 2025. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v15.i10.111286
Table 1 Descriptive statistics by group, mean ± SD

High LCS (n = 27)
Low LCS (n = 31)
χ2/t
P value
Age23.14 ±1.7522.94 ± 2.140.380.705
Sex (male/female)13/1418/130.570.453
LMSQ score47.56 ± 4.6429.26 ± 4.2815.61< 0.001
Table 2 Difference test of anxiety among individuals with different looming cognitive styles, mean ± SD

High LCS (n = 49)
Low LCS (n = 49)
t
P value
DASS-21A6.98 ± 6.542.66 ± 3.434.10< 0.001
STAI-S40.75 ± 8.4732.52 ± 6.788.14< 0.001
ASI-320.06 ± 12.409.48 ± 8.037.63< 0.001
LMSQ49.26 ± 4.8230.73 ± 3.645.63< 0.001
Table 3 Correlation analysis table of Looming Maladaptive Style Questionnaire with anxiety scales (n = 196)

STAI-S
ASI-3
DASS-21A
LMSQ0.384a0.387a6.23a
LMSQ-physical threat0.299a0.329a0.219a
LMSQ-social threat0.411a0.386a0.259a
Table 4 Four eye-tracking metrics among individuals with different looming cognitive styles
VariableHigh LCS (n = 27)
Low LCS (n = 31)
FP value
Mean
SD
Mean
SD
First fixation latency (ms)Threat473.3283.34544.85144.615.110.028
Neutral818.79156.95717.44105.808.490.005
First fixation duration (ms)Threat244.1757.73298.45173.462.410.126
Neutral279.6886.40302.93142.950.540.465
Fixation duration (ms)Threat905.23247.00901.63231.092.410.955
Neutral679.62174.85853.20271.290.540.006
Fixation count (n)Threat292.4191.00253.32101.462.360.130
Neutral195.4166.65234.9779.044.180.046
First fixation latency bias (ms)Bias scores-345.46142.97-172.63168.800.010.914
First fixation duration bias (ms)Bias scores-35.6344.14-4.5243.190.220.643
Gaze duration bias (%)Threat56.710.0551.460.074.070.048
Fixation orientation bias (%)Threat60.240.0550.630.086.110.016