Published online Oct 19, 2025. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v15.i10.111286
Revised: July 21, 2025
Accepted: August 19, 2025
Published online: October 19, 2025
Processing time: 85 Days and 22.1 Hours
Although extensive research has investigated attentional biases based on the looming vulnerability model of anxiety, the characteristics of attentional biases in individuals with looming cognitive styles (LCS) remain incompletely elucidated. No prior eye-tracking studies have examined the spatiotemporal dynamics of their threat-related attentional preferences.
To investigate the nature and temporal pattern of attentional biases toward threat stimuli in individuals exhibiting different levels of LCS using eye-tracking tech
A total of 212 participants were stratified according to their Looming Maladaptive Style Questionnaire scores. From the high and low scoring subgroups, 35 parti
Distinct attentional bias patterns were observed between high and low LCS groups. High LCS individuals exhibited a vigilance-avoidance pattern characterized by initial vigilance toward threat stimuli (evidenced by faster detection and preferential orienting), followed by attentional avoidance, alongside sustained attention maintenance to threat.
These findings reveal a temporal dissociation between early vigilance and later avoidance during threat processing in high LCS individuals, providing novel empirical evidence to refine models of cognitive vulnerability and attentional dynamics in threat perception.
Core Tip: This eye-tracking study reveals a threat-related attentional bias in individuals with high looming cognitive style (LCS). High LCS individuals exhibited a vigilance-avoidance pattern characterized by initial vigilance toward threat stimuli, followed by attentional avoidance, alongside sustained attentional maintenance to threat. Paradoxically, they also showed prolonged overall attention to threat. This temporal dissociation between early vigilance and later avoidance, captured via precise eye-movement metrics, refines the Looming Vulnerability Model and provides crucial empirical evidence on the dynamic attentional mechanisms underlying threat perception in cognitive vulnerability.