BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Observational Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2025. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
World J Psychiatry. Oct 19, 2025; 15(10): 111286
Published online Oct 19, 2025. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v15.i10.111286
Threat-related attentional bias in subjects with different looming cognitive styles: Evidence based on eye-tracking study
Xuan Wang, Shuai Chen, Bin Tian, Wen-Peng Cai
Xuan Wang, Business School, Central University of Finance and Economics, Beijing 100081, China
Xuan Wang, School of Literature, Guizhou University of Finance and Economics, Guiyang 550025, Guizhou Province, China
Shuai Chen, Wen-Peng Cai, Faculty of Psychology, Naval Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China
Bin Tian, Psychological center, Institute of Student Affairs, Shanghai Jian Qiao University, Shanghai 20 200433, China
Co-corresponding authors: Bin Tian and Wen-Peng Cai.
Author contributions: Wang X contributed to methodology, formal analysis, data collection, follow-up, writing, reviewing, and editing; Chen S contributed to data collection, data curation, follow-up, formal analysis, writing, reviewing, and editing; Tian B was involved in supervision and follow-up and data curation; Cai WP contributed to conceptualization, funding acquisition, methodology, writing, reviewing, and editing; All authors contributed to the interpretation of the study and approved the final version to be published.
Supported by the Shanghai Municipal Health Commission, China, No. GWV-10.2-YQ46.
Institutional review board statement: The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Naval Medical University (Approval No. GWV-10.2-YQ46) and complied with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki.
Informed consent statement: Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.
Conflict-of-interest statement: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
STROBE statement: The authors have read the CONSORT 2010 Statement, and the manuscript was prepared and revised according to the CONSORT 2010 Statement.
Data sharing statement: The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Open Access: This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: https://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Corresponding author: Wen-Peng Cai, MD, PhD, Associate Professor, Faculty of Psychology, Naval Medical University, No. 800 Xiangyin Road, Shanghai 200433, China. wpcai@smmu.edu.cn
Received: July 3, 2025
Revised: July 21, 2025
Accepted: August 19, 2025
Published online: October 19, 2025
Processing time: 85 Days and 22.1 Hours
Abstract
BACKGROUND

Although extensive research has investigated attentional biases based on the looming vulnerability model of anxiety, the characteristics of attentional biases in individuals with looming cognitive styles (LCS) remain incompletely elucidated. No prior eye-tracking studies have examined the spatiotemporal dynamics of their threat-related attentional preferences.

AIM

To investigate the nature and temporal pattern of attentional biases toward threat stimuli in individuals exhibiting different levels of LCS using eye-tracking technology.

METHODS

A total of 212 participants were stratified according to their Looming Maladaptive Style Questionnaire scores. From the high and low scoring subgroups, 35 participants were randomly selected for an eye-tracking experiment using a classic dot-probe paradigm featuring threat and neutral images. Four eye-tracking metrics, including first fixation latency, first fixation duration, total fixation duration, and fixation count, were analyzed to assess detection speed, attentional orienting, initial maintenance/avoidance, and overall engagement.

RESULTS

Distinct attentional bias patterns were observed between high and low LCS groups. High LCS individuals exhibited a vigilance-avoidance pattern characterized by initial vigilance toward threat stimuli (evidenced by faster detection and preferential orienting), followed by attentional avoidance, alongside sustained attention maintenance to threat.

CONCLUSION

These findings reveal a temporal dissociation between early vigilance and later avoidance during threat processing in high LCS individuals, providing novel empirical evidence to refine models of cognitive vulnerability and attentional dynamics in threat perception.

Keywords: Anxiety; Attentional bias; Looming cognitive styles; College students; Eye-tracking study

Core Tip: This eye-tracking study reveals a threat-related attentional bias in individuals with high looming cognitive style (LCS). High LCS individuals exhibited a vigilance-avoidance pattern characterized by initial vigilance toward threat stimuli, followed by attentional avoidance, alongside sustained attentional maintenance to threat. Paradoxically, they also showed prolonged overall attention to threat. This temporal dissociation between early vigilance and later avoidance, captured via precise eye-movement metrics, refines the Looming Vulnerability Model and provides crucial empirical evidence on the dynamic attentional mechanisms underlying threat perception in cognitive vulnerability.