Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Psychiatry. Oct 19, 2025; 15(10): 108989
Published online Oct 19, 2025. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v15.i10.108989
Published online Oct 19, 2025. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v15.i10.108989
Table 1 Comparison of general baseline data between the two groups, n (%)
Indicator | Research group (n = 59) | Control group (n = 59) | χ²/t | P value |
Age (years) | 67.3 ± 4.1 | 68.4 ± 4.2 | 1.440 | 0.153 |
Gender | 0.034 | 0.852 | ||
Male | 26 | 25 | ||
Female | 33 | 34 | ||
Comorbidities | ||||
Hypertension | 18 | 21 | 0.344 | 0.557 |
Coronary heart disease | 19 | 14 | 1.051 | 0.305 |
Diabetes | 9 | 6 | 0.687 | 0.407 |
BMI (kg/m2) | 23.31 ± 2.23 | 23.88 ± 2.55 | 1.292 | 0.199 |
Education level (n) | 1.264 | 0.260 | ||
Junior high school or below | 32 | 38 | ||
High school or above | 27 | 21 |
Table 2 Comparison of nutritional status between the two groups
Nutritional status indicators | Research group (n = 59) | Control group (n = 59) | ||
Before intervention | After intervention | Before intervention | After intervention | |
Alb (g/L) | 25.08 ± 6.75 | 34.11 ± 3.89a,b | 24.86 ± 6.73 | 28.76 ± 4.31b |
PA (mg/L) | 120.54 ± 9.21 | 247.12 ± 16.12a,b | 121.45 ± 9.22 | 185.42 ± 14.15b |
Hb (g/L) | 71.21 ± 9.13 | 85.33 ± 11.13a,b | 71.25 ± 9.09 | 76.31 ± 12.65b |
Table 3 Correlation between nutritional status and cognitive function
Cognitive indicator | Nutritional indicator | r | P value |
ΔMMSE | ΔAlb | 0.807 | < 0.001 |
ΔMMSE | ΔPA | 0.689 | < 0.001 |
ΔMMSE | ΔHb | 0.979 | < 0.001 |
ΔMoCA | ΔAlb | 0.948 | < 0.001 |
ΔMoCA | ΔPA | 0.878 | < 0.001 |
ΔMoCA | ΔHb | 0.940 | < 0.001 |
Table 4 Comparison of quality of life scores between the two groups (score)
Quality of life scores | Research group (n = 59) | Control group (n = 59) | t | P value | ||
Before intervention | After intervention | Before intervention | After intervention | |||
Physical functioning | 62.10 ± 8.55 | 78.22 ± 11.18a | 62.34 ± 8.05 | 66.17 ± 9.34a | 6.359 | < 0.001 |
General health | 81.22 ± 11.83 | 92.63 ± 7.22a | 81.29 ± 9.23 | 86.64 ± 12.15a | 2.793 | 0.003 |
Social functioning | 60.22 ± 10.20 | 73.85 ± 11.23a | 60.88 ± 10.23 | 65.54 ± 10.35a | 4.175 | < 0.001 |
Emotional role | 50.54 ± 8.11 | 64.78 ± 9.67a | 50.58 ± 8.18 | 56.42 ± 7.23a | 5.309 | < 0.001 |
Mental health | 49.42 ± 7.50 | 69.22 ± 10.89a | 49.41 ± 7.44 | 56.34 ± 7.67a | 7.427 | < 0.001 |
Table 5 Comparison of nursing satisfaction between the two groups, n (%)
Group | Satisfied | Generally satisfied | Dissatisfied | Satisfaction rate |
Research group (n = 59) | 28 (47.46) | 26 (44.07) | 5 (8.47) | 54 (91.53) |
Control group (n = 59) | 21 (35.59) | 23 (38.98) | 15 (25.42) | 44 (74.58) |
χ² | 6.020 | |||
P value | 0.014 |
- Citation: Gong J, Zheng J. Nutritional and social support enhance cognitive function in acute cerebral infarction patients. World J Psychiatry 2025; 15(10): 108989
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2220-3206/full/v15/i10/108989.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5498/wjp.v15.i10.108989