Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Crit Care Med. Dec 9, 2025; 14(4): 109164
Published online Dec 9, 2025. doi: 10.5492/wjccm.v14.i4.109164
Published online Dec 9, 2025. doi: 10.5492/wjccm.v14.i4.109164
Table 1 Approximate dimensions for needles, wires and cannulae utilized in arterial catheterization; note that minor variability exists between manufacturers, products, and measurement systems
| Needle or catheter gauge | Needle or catheter outer diameter (mm) | Matching guidewire thickness (inches) | Gravity flow rate (mL/minute) |
| 22G | 0.7-0.9 | 0.014 | 35 |
| 21G | 0.8-0.9 | 0.018 | 60 |
| 20G | 0.9-1.1 | 0.025 | 65 |
| 18G | 1.2-1.3 | 0.035 | 100 |
Table 2 Characteristics of common commercially available arterial line products; these examples represent classic dimensions but many size combinations are available
| Product | Pink BD Insyte | Blue BD Insyte | Vygon Leadercath | Arrow Quickflash | Arrow Integrated | Arrow Seldinger | BD Floswitch |
| Assembly style | CN | CN | S | IW | IW | S | CN |
| Intended insertion site | Radial | Radial | Radial | Radial | Radial | Femoral | Radial |
| Catheter material | Polyurethane | Polyurethane | Polyethylene | Polyurethane | Polyurethane | Polyurethane | Polyurethane |
| Catheter gauge | 20G | 22G | 20G | 20G | 20G | 18G | 20G |
| Catheter length (cm) | 3 | 2.5 | 8 | 3.8 | 4.5 | 16 | 4.5 |
| Introducer needle gauge | 21G | 23G | 20G | 21G | 22G | 18G | 21G |
| Introducer needle length (cm) | 3.8 | 7 | |||||
| Guidewire material | Stainless steel | Stainless steel | Stainless steel | Stainless steel | |||
| Guidewire gauge (inches) | 0.021 | 0.018 | 0.018 | 0.025 |
Table 3 Important aspects in the daily care of arterial lines
| Daily care | Explanation |
| Dressings | The optimal dressing products, frequency of dressing changes and frequency of site inspections are uncertain. A common practice is to replace dressings weekly or sooner if they become loose or unclean. Local institutional policies should be followed. A topical cleansing agent should be applied to the catheter site during a dressing change to prevent infection[76,83] |
| Antibiotic prophylaxis | Daily antimicrobial prophylaxis to prevent infection while the arterial line is in situ is not advised, as evidence is insufficient |
| Securement | Both sutures and adhesive dressings are suitable methods for catheter securement. No consistent differences in adverse events have been demonstrated[84]. Sutures were associated with fewer arterial line displacements in retrospective studies compared with sutureless fixation dressings but may predispose to infection |
| Flushing | A continuous slow infusion of normal saline is delivered through the arterial line to maintain patency. A pressure bag attached to the transducer system is commonly inflated to 300 mmHg to deliver fluid at a rate of ~3 mL/hour. This configuration reduced adverse events compared with intermittent flushes or infusion rates[85,86]. Heparin does not improve patency over normal saline[87] |
| Routine catheter changes | Routine arterial line changes are not recommended. Regular arterial line replacement does not reduce the risk of catheter-related sepsis as opposed to a process of replacement only when clinically indicated[88-90]. The relationship between catheter dwell time and the incidence of infection is unclear |
- Citation: Yaxley J. Intra-arterial catheters: An evidence-based review of device design, function and application. World J Crit Care Med 2025; 14(4): 109164
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2220-3141/full/v14/i4/109164.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5492/wjccm.v14.i4.109164
