©The Author(s) 2026.
World J Clin Urol. Feb 12, 2026; 15(1): 114707
Published online Feb 12, 2026. doi: 10.5410/wjcu.v15.i1.114707
Published online Feb 12, 2026. doi: 10.5410/wjcu.v15.i1.114707
Table 1 Urological manifestations across chronic kidney disease stages and their clinical outcomes
| CKD stage | Urological manifestations | Impact on CKD outcomes | Clinical implications |
| Stage 1-2 (early CKD) | Polyuria, nocturia | Early signs of tubulointerstitial damage; often missed, delaying diagnosis | Need for early screening and symptom recognition |
| Stage 3-4 (moderate CKD) | LUTS (urgency, frequency, hesitancy), recurrent UTIs | UTIs accelerate nephron loss; LUTS complicate fluid balance | Routine urological evaluation; manage comorbidities like diabetes/BPH |
| Stage 5 (ESKD, pre-dialysis) | Bladder dysfunction (DU, BO), anuria, incontinence | Disuse atrophy, fibrosis, increased infection risk, poor dialysis outcomes | Multidisciplinary care; monitor bladder function and infection risk |
| Dialysis-dependent | Reduced bladder capacity, poor sensation, persistent LUTS | LUTS persist despite anuria; linked to lower QoL | Use of validated questionnaires; targeted symptom management |
| Post-transplant | Ureteral stenosis, VUR, persistent LUTS | Surgical complications and persistent symptoms affect graft function | Coordinated nephrology-urology follow-up |
Table 2 Lower urinary tract symptoms and urine output pattern by chronic kidney disease stage
| CKD stage | LUTS | Urine output pattern |
| Stage 1 eGFR (> 90) | Mild frequency, possible urgency in glomerular disease | Normal or slightly increased (polyuria in some cases) |
| Stage 2 eGFR (60-89) | Nocturia, mild urgency/frequency | Normal or mildly reduced |
| Stage 3 eGFR (30-59) | Nocturia, urgency, incontinence, hesitancy | May show reduced concentration ability, nocturnal polyuria |
| Stage 4 eGFR (15-29) | Urinary retention, overflow incontinence, weak stream | Marked reduction in output (oliguria) |
| Stage 5 eGFR (< 15 or ESKD) | Severe LUTS, incontinence, poor bladder sensation | Severely reduced or absent (anuria), dialysis-dependent |
Table 3 Common bladder dysfunction types in dialysis patients
| Type of dysfunction | Description | Prevalence |
| DU | Weak bladder muscle contraction; leads to incomplete emptying | Common in long-term dialysis patients, may coexist with sensory deficits |
| BO | Heightened sensation despite low urine volume; causes urgency | Frequently reported; often overlaps with other dysfunctions |
| Overflow incontinence | Bladder overfills due to poor emptying; leaks involuntarily | Less common but clinically significant; may result from DU |
| Loss of bladder sensation | Patients may not feel the need to urinate, even when bladder is full | Often underdiagnosed; contributes to silent retention and overflow |
| Small bladder capacity | Due to long-term anuria and disuse, bladder shrinks in volume | Very common in anuric patients; reversible with restored urine output |
| Mixed dysfunction | Combination of two or more dysfunction types | Frequently observed; requires individualized assessment and management |
Table 4 Clinical recommendations for bladder dysfunction in dialysis patients
| Recommendation | Evidence grade | Practical notes/applicability |
| Use validated questionnaires (e.g., IPSS, OABSS) for early detection of LUTS in dialysis patients | 2B | Low-cost, feasible in most clinical settings; useful for screening but limited by patient self-reporting bias |
| Perform uroflowmetry and PVR measurement in symptomatic patients | 1B | Provides objective assessment; requires equipment and trained staff, may be less feasible in resource-limited centers |
| Refer dialysis patients with persistent LUTS to urology for further evaluation (urodynamics, cystoscopy if indicated) | 1C | Strong recommendation despite limited trial data; referral may be challenging in rural/Low-resource areas |
| Implement bladder training and fluid management strategies to improve storage/voiding symptoms | 2C | Non-invasive, low-cost, but requires patient adherence and education |
| Consider pharmacological therapy (e.g., antimuscarinics for BO, alpha-blockers for voiding dysfunction) when conservative measures fail | 2B | Evidence mainly extrapolated from non-CKD populations; careful monitoring needed due to altered drug clearance in ESKD |
| Incorporate routine LUTS/QoL assessment into dialysis care protocols | 1C | Improves holistic patient management; feasible with minimal resources if integrated into dialysis unit workflow |
Table 5 Risk of urinary tract infections and their sequelae across different stages of chronic kidney disease in patients with urological causes
| CKD stage | Risk of UTI | Contributing factors | Common sequelae | Clinical implications |
| Stage 1-2 | Mild to moderate | (1) Structural abnormalities; and (2) Incomplete bladder emptying | (1) Occasional pyuria; and (2) Mild renal inflammation | Early detection and urological management can prevent progression |
| Stage 3 | Moderate | (1) Reduced renal clearance; and (2) Recurrent infections | (1) Accelerated GFR decline; and (2) Onset of antibiotic resistance | Close monitoring and tailored antimicrobial therapy are essential to slow progression |
| Stage 4 | High | (1) Impaired immune response; and (2) Chronic colonization | (1) Frequent hospitalizations; and (2) Risk of systemic infection | Repeated or resistant infections can hasten CKD progression; aggressive infection control is needed |
| Stage 5 (ESKD) | Very high | (1) Dialysis-related risks; and (2) Severe urinary tract dysfunction | (1) Sepsis; and (2) Multidrug-resistant organisms | Multidisciplinary care essential; infection prevention is critical |
Table 6 Stage-based nephro-urological management pathway in chronic kidney disease
| CKD stage | Routine urological screening | Referral triggers | Co-management goals |
| Stage 1-2 (early CKD) | (1) Urinalysis (proteinuria, hematuria); (2) Kidney/bladder ultrasound; and (3) History of LUTS, recurrent UTIs, stone disease | (1) Recurrent UTIs; (2) Hematuria not explained by nephrology; and (3) Suspected obstruction (hydronephrosis, poor bladder emptying) | (1) Identify and treat reversible urological causes early; and (2) Prevent progression of CKD |
| Stage 3-4 (moderate CKD) | (1) Post-void residual measurement Uroflowmetry if LUTS present; and (2) Stone risk assessment (metabolic work-up) | (1) Persistent LUTS despite medical therapy; and (2) Recurrent stones Obstructive uropathy on imaging | (1) Slow CKD progression; (2) Prevent recurrent infections and obstruction; and (3) Optimize bladder function |
| Stage 5 (ESKD, pre-dialysis) | (1) Focused urological history and exam; and (2) Imaging for obstruction if symptoms/signs present | (1) Hydronephrosis or ureteral stricture; and (2) Severe LUTS impacting quality of life | (1) Prepare for renal replacement therapy; and (2) Ensure unobstructed urinary tract before transplant |
| Dialysis-dependent | (1) Catheter/vascular access infection surveillance; and (2) Bladder function assessment in long-term dialysis | (1) Recurrent UTIs or urosepsis; and (2) Catheter-related complications | (1) Prevent infection; (2) Manage bladder dysfunction; and (3) Maintain quality of life |
- Citation: Elahi T, Ahmed S, Mubarak M. Urological footprint of chronic kidney disease: A nephrologist perspective on early detection and collaborative management. World J Clin Urol 2026; 15(1): 114707
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2219-2816/full/v15/i1/114707.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5410/wjcu.v15.i1.114707
