Published online Feb 8, 2016. doi: 10.5409/wjcp.v5.i1.102
Peer-review started: May 21, 2015
First decision: September 17, 2015
Revised: October 16, 2015
Accepted: December 3, 2015
Article in press: December 4, 2015
Published online: February 8, 2016
Processing time: 253 Days and 2 Hours
AIM: To evaluate the efficacy of drawings as a projective measure of pain and distress in children undergoing dental extractions.
METHODS: Children in the age range of 4-13 years with existence of untreatable caries or over-retained primary teeth, indicated for extractions were included. Pain was assessed using one behavioral, faces, legs, activity, cry and consolability (FLACC) scale; and a self report measure; faces pain scale-revised (FPS-R), at two points of time, after completion of local anesthetic administration and after extraction. The general behavior of children was assessed with Wright’s modification of Frankl rating scale. At the end of the session, children were instructed to represent, themselves along with the dentist and their experiences of the dental treatment through drawing. The drawings were scored utilizing Child drawing: Hospital scale (CD: H) manual and correlated with FLACC, FPS-R and Frankl using Pearson correlation test.
RESULTS: A positive correlation, though statistically not significant, was observed between CD: H scores and all other considered parameters (Frankl, FPS-R and FLACC) in the present study.
CONCLUSION: Drawings could not act as surrogate measure of child’s pain; however, they acted as a narrative of his/her experiences and reflection of inner emotions. Hence, drawings can be used as an additional dental armamentarium.
Core tip: Assessing the effect of an invasive dental treatment, like extractions, on children is very important. To achieve this, drawings can be addressed as a method for working with children. They act as narrative of children’s painful experience and emotions.