Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Orthop. Apr 18, 2026; 17(4): 116707
Published online Apr 18, 2026. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v17.i4.116707
Published online Apr 18, 2026. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v17.i4.116707
Table 1 Horizontal comparison of the main categories of bone graft materials
| Ref. | Type of graft | Main properties | Advantages | Limitations | Typical clinical applications |
| [142,143] | Autograft | Osteogenic, osteoinductive, osteoconductive; no immune response | Gold standard; high predictability; rapid integration | Donor-site morbidity; limited volume | Large defects, non-unions, orthopedic reconstruction, maxillofacial surgery |
| [144,145] | Allograft | Mainly osteoconductive; may retain osteoinductive potential depending on processing | No second surgical site; wide availability | Possible immune reaction; slower integration; disease transmission risk | Orthopedic revision surgery, spinal fusion, large defects |
| [146,147] | Xenograft | Highly osteoconductive; stable porous structure; slow resorption | Excellent volume maintenance; good scaffold for bone growth | Very slow remodeling; no osteogenic potential | Alveolar ridge preservation, sinus lift, moderate orthopedic defects |
| [148,149] | Synthetic (HA, β-TCP, bioceramics) | Controlled porosity; adjustable resorption; bioinert or bioactive depending on composition | No risk of disease transmission; unlimited availability; tunable properties | Lower mechanical strength; variable integration depending on formulation | Filling small to medium defects, orthopedic revisions, periodontal/trauma defects |
| [150,151] | Composite biomaterials | Combine organic and inorganic components; mechanical reinforcement; enhanced bioactivity | Balanced resorption; improved handling; increased mechanical stability | Higher cost; variable performance depending on formulation | Load-bearing defects, trauma reconstruction, implant dentistry |
Table 2 Classification of bone substitute biomaterials according to information provided by the manufacturers: Biomaterials of natural origin
| Ref. | Commercial name/country/ | Composition | Physical properties | Biological properties | Mechanical properties | Resorption/ | Clinical efficacy | Form/cost |
| [167] | Bonefill | Mineralized bovine spongy xenograft | White granules, irregular, porous | Biocompatible, osteoconductive, high interconnectivity | Lightweight, strong; maintains space and support | Slow and progressive (6-9 months) | Documented use in sinus lift, GBR, and alveolar filling | Granules (0.10-2.5 mm)/affordable |
| [168] | Cerabone®/ | 100% inorganic, calcined bovine bone | Purified ceramic; hard and stable particles | Biocompatible; osteoconductive; bone scaffold | High stability and strength | Very slow; progressive integration | Well-established use in peri-implant grafts, sinus lift, and bone augmentation | Granules and blocks (0.5-4 mm) high |
| [169] | Geistlich | Bovine xenograft | Porous, similar to human bone | Biocompatible, osteoconductive | Preserves volume and structure | Slow, promotes maintenance | Widely used in implant dentistry; proven clinical efficacy | Granules and blocks (0.25-2 mm) high |
| [172] | GenMix®/ | Inorganic bovine xenograft (cortical and cancellous matrix) | Dry granules, lightweight; high volumetric stability; good handling | Biocompatible; osteoconductive; promotes new bone formation; no transmission risk | Good initial strength; intermediate support | Slow and partial (some particles > 12 months); integration 6-9 months | Used in alveolar grafts, sinus lift, ridge augmentation; studies show predictability and maintenance | Granules (0.25 mm; 0.5 mm; 1.0 mm)/ |
| [195] | GenOx | Inorganic bovine xenograft (mineral bone matrix, sintered) | Rigid, stable granules; resistant to rapid resorption; volume-maintaining | Biocompatible; osteoconductive; non-immunogenic; slow bone replacement | High initial strength; prolonged support; indicated for load-bearing areas | Very slow (> 24 months) | Used in sinus lifts, ridge augmentation, alveolar filling, and periodontal applications; proven efficacy | Granules (0.25 mm; 0.5 mm; 1.0 mm; 2.0 mm)/affordable cost |
| [170] | GenOx | Organic and inorganic bovine matrix (type I collagen) | Lightweight, porous, and moldable; trabecular structure | Biocompatible, osteoconductive, potential osteopromotive effect | Lower resistance; suitable for low-load areas | 6 months to 12 months | Effective in GBR, fillings, and esthetic areas; good remodeling | Granules (0.25-2 mm)/affordable |
| [173] | Lumina-Bone | Inorganic lyophilized bovine xenograft | Highly porous, bone-like | Biocompatible, osteoconductive | Preserves volume and structure | Slow (6-12 months or more) | Successful in reconstructions, sinus lift, and preservation | Granules (0.25-1 mm)/affordable |
| [174] | MinerOss | Porcine xenograft (inorganic bone matrix) | Dry, sterile, irregular granules; high volumetric stability | Biocompatible; osteoconductive; good bone integration | Limited structural support; dimensional stability | Slow (6-9 months) | Widely used in GBR, sinus lift, alveolar preservation, and peri-implant defects; good volumetric maintenance and integration | Granules (0.25 mm; 1.0 mm; 2.0 mm)/ |
| [196] | OrthoGen | Bovine xenograft | Rigid granules; good volumetric stability; non-collapsing | Biocompatible; osteoconductive; guides bone growth; no rejection | Adequate structural support; maintains space; compatible with membranes/PRF | Very slow (up to 24 months) | Used in GBR, ridge augmentation, sinus lift, peri-implant, and post-extraction; studies show stability and osseointegration | Granules (0.25 mm; 0.5 mm; 1.0 mm; 2.0 mm)/affordable cost |
| [197] | OsteoBiol | Porcine or equine xenograft | Dry, rigid, trabecular granules | Biocompatible; osteoconductive; matrix for osteoprogenitor cells and new bone formation | High temporary resistance; good support and volume maintenance | Slow (9-12 months) | Effective for sinus lift, alveolar regeneration, and ridge augmentation; extensive clinical and histological evidence | Granules (0.25-2.0 mm)/moderate to high cost |
| [175] | OsteoBiol | Porcine or equine xenograft (cortical and cancellous bone + preserved collagen) | Natural trabecular structure; easy handling | Biocompatible; osteoconductive; native collagen promotes regeneration | Temporary structural support; maintains volume | Slow (6-12 months) | High efficacy; supported by multiple clinical and histological studies | Granules (0.25 mm; 1.0 mm; 2.0 mm)/ |
| [176] | Osteosynt®/ | Bovine xenograft (HA + β-TCP) | Dry, white granules; texture similar to cancellous bone; high volumetric stability | Biocompatible; osteoconductive; no inflammatory response; supports cell colonization and bone formation | Non-deformable; maintains space; limited mechanical load support | Slow (6-18 months) | Used in GBR, sinus lift, post-extraction sockets, and peri-implant defects; maintains volume; can be combined with membranes or PRF | Granules (0.25 mm; 1.0 mm; 2.0 mm), block, wedge, sphere/affordable cost |
| [177] | SmartBone®/ | Bovine xenograft (HA) + biodegradable polymers + type I collagen | Rigid trabecular structure | Biocompatible; osteoconductive; bioactive; rapid tissue integration | High compressive strength; excellent stability; can be fixed with plates or screws | Slow (6-18 months) | Recommended for load-bearing reconstructions in implantology, orthopedics, and oncology; extensive scientific documentation | Granules, blocks, and strips/high cost |
| [178] | THE Graf®/ | Porcine bone mineral matrix, similar to human bone | Interconnected pores, high hydrophilicity | Biocompatible, free of immunogenic agents, osteoconductive | Stable structure for regeneration | From 10 weeks | In vitro, in vivo and clinical studies | Granules/high |
Table 3 Classification of bone substitute biomaterials according to information provided by the manufacturers: Synthetic and composite biomaterials
| Ref. | Commercial name/ | Composition | Physical properties | Biological properties | Mechanical properties | Resorption/ | Clinical efficacy | Form/cost |
| [179] | Alobone | Synthetic: Low-crystallinity hydroxyapatite | Porous granules, promote vascularization | Biocompatible, osteoconductive, protein-free | Suitable for filling bone defects | Gradual, replaced by new bone | Positive results in sinus lift, ridge augmentation, and preservation | Granules (0.25-1 mm)/ |
| [180,181] | BioGran®/ | Alloplastic; bioactive glass 45S5 (calcium sodium silicate) | Translucent white; microporous; high surface area | Biocompatible; osteoconductive; potentially osteoinductive; stimulates osteogenesis, angiogenesis, and HA formation | Stable in small to moderate defects; no structural support in load-bearing areas | Rapid (3-6 months); efficient | Good results in alveolar, peri-implant, periodontal, and sinus regeneration | Granules (0.3-0.35 mm)/ |
| [182] | Bonecerami®/ | Alloplastic; 60% HA + 40% β-TCP | 3D structure similar to cancellous bone | Biocompatible; osteoconductive; cell adhesion; no significant inflammatory response | Lightweight and stable; not indicated for high-load areas without protection | 4-6 months; | High predictability in GBR, sinus lift, and alveolar filling; comparable to xenografts | Granules (0.5/1.0-2.0 mm)/ |
| [181] | Calcigen S®/ | Alloplastic; calcium sulfate | Moldable (spheres, blocks, wedges); powder-liquid mix; sets in 4-6 minutes | Biocompatible; osteoconductive; promotes bone growth | Quick application; not indicated for load-bearing support | 8-12 weeks | Used as filler in orthopedics and dentistry; conducive environment for bone regeneration | Powder for mixing/ |
| [171] | GenPhos | Synthetic: 70% HA + 30% β-TCP | Porous granules, similar to cancellous bone | Biocompatible, osteoconductive, protein-free | Good initial strength, lower than ceramics | Slow (7-9 months); gradual integration | Positive use in sockets, ridge augmentation, and peri-implant areas | Granules (0.5-0.75 mm)/ |
| [183] | Grafton | Allogeneic; demineralized human bone + glycerol | Moldable; ready to use; adapts to irregular defects | Biocompatible; osteoconductive and potentially osteoinductive; stimulates osteogenesis and angiogenesis; forms HA in situ | Limited support; not indicated for load-bearing areas | 3 months to 12 months (variable) | Widely used in reconstructions, implants, and orthopedics | Gel, paste, sponge, strip/high cost |
| [184] | HAP-91®/ | Synthetic; pure synthetic HA | White, homogeneous granules; high volumetric stability; non-collapsing | Biocompatible; osteoconductive; non-immunogenic; promotes bone conduction | Good initial strength; adequate support for load and non-load areas; non-moldable | Very slow (18-24 months) | Indicated for alveolar grafts, sinus lift, GBR, peri-implant, and ridge augmentation; volumetric maintenance and osseointegration | Granules (0.15 mm; 0.3 mm; 0.5 mm; 1.0 mm; 2.0 mm)/ |
| [185] | MinerOss®/ | Allogeneic; human cortical and/or cancellous bone | Dry and rehydratable particles; easy adaptation | Biocompatible; osteoconductive; possible residual osteoinduction | Intermediate support | 4 months to 9 months (variable) | Widely used in implant dentistry and GBR | 0.25 mm to 1.0 mm; particulate (cortical, cancellous, or mix)/ |
| [186] | Nanosynt®/ | Synthetic: 60% hydroxyapatite + 40% β-TCP | Porous nanostructure, high capillarity | Biocompatible, osteoconductive, non-immunogenic | Good initial stability; intermediate mechanics | Controlled/ | Good outcomes in preservation, bone augmentation, and peri-implant procedures; systematic reviews | Granules (0.25-2 mm)/ |
| [187] | OsteoGen®/ | Alloplastic; synthetic HA | Dry, lightweight granules; maintains stability | Biocompatible; osteoconductive; non-immunogenic | Fragile; moderate support in cavities | 6-9 months | Used in implants, post-extraction sockets, and periodontics; good but limited literature compared to others | Granules (0.3-0.5 mm), dry/ |
| [188] | Vitoss®/ | Synthetic β-tricalcium phosphate (β-TCP) | Lightweight, porous, hydrophilic texture; easy to handle | Biocompatible; osteoconductive; stimulates vital bone formation | Fragile structure; compressible and adaptable but requires stabilization; not recommended for load-bearing sites | Moderate (4-9 months) | Effective in small to medium defects; indicated for trauma, spine, orthopedics, implantology, and periodontics | Granules and moldable putty/ |
- Citation: Horvath Pereira BO, Horvath-Pereira BO, Reis CHB, da Silva ELR, da Silva-Júnior LN, Buchaim RL, Buchaim DV. Biological approaches and biomaterial-based solutions for bone reconstruction: A comprehensive review. World J Orthop 2026; 17(4): 116707
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2218-5836/full/v17/i4/116707.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v17.i4.116707
