BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Systematic Reviews
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2026. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
World J Orthop. Jan 18, 2026; 17(1): 112625
Published online Jan 18, 2026. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v17.i1.112625
Return to farming after orthopedic surgery: A systematic review
Eva Lehtonen, Ruja Kambli, Krishna Mandalia, Kaley Beall, Sarav S Shah
Eva Lehtonen, Kaley Beall, Sarav S Shah, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, New England Baptist Hospital, Boston, MA 02120, United States
Ruja Kambli, Larner College of Medicine, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT 05405, United States
Krishna Mandalia, Department of General Surgery, Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, CA 90502, United States
Author contributions: Lehtonen E contributed to data curation; Lehtonen E and Kambli R performed the literature search, formal analysis and drafting of the manuscript; Lehtonen E, Mandalia K, Beall K, and Shah SS writing and editing of the manuscript; Lehtonen E and Shah SS conceptualized the study; Kambli R contributed to data extraction; Mandalia K assisted with data analysis; Beall K assisted with project administration; Shah S supervised the study, and served as guarantor of the work. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.
Conflict-of-interest statement: All the authors report no relevant conflicts of interest for this article.
PRISMA 2009 Checklist statement: The authors have read the PRISMA 2009 Checklist, and the manuscript was prepared and revised according to the PRISMA 2009 Checklist.
Open Access: This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: https://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Corresponding author: Sarav S Shah, MD, Department of Orthopedics, New England Baptist Hospital, 125 Parker Hill Ave, Boston, MA 02120, United States. saravshah1@gmail.com
Received: August 4, 2025
Revised: September 12, 2025
Accepted: November 21, 2025
Published online: January 18, 2026
Processing time: 160 Days and 17.8 Hours
Abstract
BACKGROUND

There has been an increasing focus in recent years on health-care disparities. Studies investigating return to work (RTW) or sports are often performed in large, urban areas. Relatively few studies have investigated rates of return to farming or other heavy labor that is of interest to patients in rural areas.

AIM

To evaluate the literature regarding RTW in farming or heavy labor after orthopedic hip, knee, or shoulder surgery.

METHODS

A search was performed in the PubMed and EMBASE databases using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Studies were included if they reported patients employed in farming or heavy labor, RTW rates after orthopedic surgery of the hip, knee, or shoulder, and had a minimum 6-month follow-up. A meta-analysis of proportions using a random-effects model was performed on three single-arm observational studies to estimate the pooled RTW rate following arthroscopic shoulder surgery.

RESULTS

Ten studies were included, and 101 farmers were identified among 440 total patients. One study involved hip surgery, two studies involved knee surgery, and seven studies involved shoulder surgery. RTW rates across studies varied by type of surgery and follow-up interval, ranging from 24% to 100%. The RTW rate was only 53.6% at 1 year following total hip arthroplasty. No studies investigated RTW in farmers following total knee arthroplasty. Among non-comparative studies, meta-analysis revealed a pooled RTW rate of 89% following arthroscopic shoulder surgery, with low heterogeneity (I2 = 30.1%). Among comparative studies, one study reported significantly higher RTW odds for patients undergoing anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty compared to reverse shoulder arthroplasty (odds ratio = 5.45). Overall, surgical intervention for shoulder pathology was associated with a high likelihood of RTW across multiple techniques, with particularly favorable outcomes for anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty.

CONCLUSION

This systematic review highlights the high rates of RTW in farmers and heavy laborers after shoulder surgery. However, our findings also underscore the need for more rural-specific research to guide patient counseling, rehabilitation expectations, and shared decision-making in this underserved population, particularly for orthopedic surgery of the hip and knee.

Keywords: Return to work; Orthopedic surgery; Farmers; Shoulder arthroplasty; Hip arthroplasty; Rural health

Core Tip: This systematic review evaluates return to work outcomes among farmers and heavy laborers following orthopedic surgeries of the hip, knee, and shoulder. The study identifies a high return to work rate after shoulder procedures, especially anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty, and reveals a significant lack of data for hip and knee surgeries in rural labor-intensive populations. These findings highlight a critical gap in orthopedic outcomes research and underscore the need for targeted studies to inform surgical decision-making and postoperative rehabilitation in physically demanding occupations.