BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Observational Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Clin Oncol. Sep 24, 2025; 16(9): 110994
Published online Sep 24, 2025. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v16.i9.110994
Table 1 General information
Sports event
Clusters
n
Composition ratio (%)
Age (years)< 307322.26
30-3920863.41
40-494112.50
≥ 5061.83
Distinguishing between the gendersMale5316.16
Female27583.84
Nursing experience (years)< 3329.76
3-5257.62
6-107723.48
11-2016149.09
> 20309.15
Level of hospitalPrimary hospital298.84
Secondary hospital329.76
Tertiary hospital26781.40
TitleRegistered nurse4313.11
Senior nurse6419.51
Nurse manager16450.00
Associate chief nurse4614.02
Chief nurse113.35
Highest education levelSecondary/tertiary329.76
Undergraduate27282.93
Postgraduate student247.32
DutiesCharge nurse16750.91
Care team leader10632.32
Head nurse4012.20
Director/deputy director of nursing103.05
Nursing department officer51.52
Nurse competenceN15316.16
N210231.10
N313641.46
N43711.28
Specialist nurse gradeCourtyard9127.74
Municipal7924.09
Provincial level (e.g., government)11936.28
National level (e.g., nature reserve)3911.89
Participation in outpatient nursing clinic visitsNo20763.11
Yes12136.89
Master's degreeNo30492.68
Yes247.32
Years of practice as a specialist oncology nurse1-525477.44
6-105215.85
> 10226.71
Table 2 Oncology nurses' beliefs and attitudes scores, professional identity scores, and self-efficacy scores regarding prescribing authority (mean ± SD)
Dimension or total score
Entry
Score
Average score for each entry
Sensing the need for prescriptive authority623.61 ± 4.613.94 ± 0.77
Self-efficacy for exercising prescriptive authority623.21 ± 4.833.87 ± 0.81
Perceived benefits of prescriptive authority1042.06 ± 7.534.21 ± 0.75
Perceived barriers to exercising prescriptive authority512.99 ± 4.692.60 ± 0.94
Beliefs and attitudes toward prescriptive authority27101.88 ± 15.133.77 ± 0.56
Professional identity21122.79 ± 20.105.85 ± 0.96
Self-efficacy1032.06 ± 6.383.21 ± 0.64
Table 3 Correlation analysis of oncology nurses' beliefs and attitudes scores, self-efficacy scores, and professional identity scores regarding prescriptive authority [r value (P value)]
Norm
Nurse prescriptive authority beliefs and attitudes
Professional identity
Self-efficacy
Nurses’ beliefs and attitudes about having prescriptive authority1--
Professional identity0.6209 (0.0000)1
Self-efficacy0.4999 (0.0000)0.7048 (0.0000)1
Table 4 Univariate analysis of oncology nurses’ beliefs and attitudes toward their prescriptive authority (mean ± SD)
Sports event
n
Score
t value/F
P value
Age (years)< 3073101.03 ± 15.930.25320.8590
30-39208101.83 ± 15.31
40-4941103.17 ± 12.85
≥ 506104.83 ± 11.72
GenderMale53106.34 ± 15.022.3690.0184
Female275101.01 ± 14.99
Nursing experience (years)< 332101.46 ± 15.500.26150.9025
3-525102.52 ± 14.03
6-1077101.06 ± 16.82
11-20161102.58 ± 14.52
> 2030100.13 ± 13.82
Level of hospitalPrimary hospital29104.86 ± 13.773.4420.0332
Secondary hospital3295.66 ± 16.21
Tertiary hospital267102.30 ± 14.94
TitleRegistered nurse 43102.93 ± 15.241.4250.2252
Senior nurse 64103.70 ± 15.76
Nurse manager16499.95 ± 15.13
Associate chief nurse46104.41 ± 14.10
Chief nurse11105.18 ± 10.50
Highest education levelSecondary/tertiary32102.25 ± 15.571.4220.2428
Undergraduate 272101.40 ± 15.33
Postgraduate student24106.79 ± 10.64
DutiesCharge nurse167101.22 ± 15.280.57140.6836
Care team leader106101.87 ± 15.38
Head nurse40102.80 ± 14.80
Director/deputy director of nursing10108.10 ± 7.80
Nursing department officer5104.20 ± 14.66
Nurse competenceN153101.92 ± 16.822.5990.0522
N210298.97 ± 15.64
N3136102.79 ± 13.93
N437106.43 ± 13.73
Specialist nurse gradeCourtyard91100.74 ± 16.222.5360.0567
Municipal7999.48 ± 18.47
Provincial level (e.g., government)119102.62 ± 11.74
National level (e.g., nature reserve)39107.10 ± 12.45
Participation in outpatient nursing clinic visitsNo207101.57 ± 14.810.47400.6358
Yes121102.39 ± 15.63
Master's degree No304101.57 ± 15.401.2930.1969
Yes24105.71 ± 10.36
Years of practice as a specialist oncology nurse1-5254101.04 ± 15.302.7830.0633
6-1052106.38 ± 13.09
> 1022100.91 ± 15.74
Table 5 Multiple linear regression analyses of beliefs and attitudes about oncology nurses’ prescriptive authority
Factor
Unstandardized coefficient
Standardized coefficient
t value
P value
Covariance statistics
β
SE
β
tolerances
VIF
Gender (female)-1.74471.9068-0.0425-0.91500.36090.93121.0739
Level of the hospital in which it is located (level II)-4.97373.1676-0.0976-1.57020.11740.51921.9260
Level of the hospital in which it is located (tertiary)1.16992.43930.03010.47960.63180.50921.9639
Professional identity0.31260.04500.41546.94820.00000.56081.7830
Self-efficacy0.49060.14370.20713.41420.00070.54501.8347
Table 6 Test results of the fit indicators of the structural equation modeling
Commonly used indicators
χ2
df
P value
χ2/df
GFI
RMSEA
TLI
CFI
NFI
NNFI
IFI
Standard of judgment--> 0.05< 3> 0.9< 0.10> 0.9> 0.9> 0.9> 0.9> 0.9
Value1.046610.30631.04660.99760.01190.99940.99990.99680.99940.9999
Is it up to the standard?YesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYes
Table 7 Summary of model regression coefficients
X - Y
Unstandardized path coefficients
SE
z (CR value)
P value
Standardized path factor
Self-efficacy - professional identity2.07960.125616.56110.00000.6748
Self-efficacy - nurses’ beliefs and attitudes about their prescriptive authority0.53340.14513.67640.00020.2249
Professional identity - nurses’ beliefs and attitudes about their prescriptive authority0.30750.04716.53070.00000.3995
Table 8 Significance test of the mediating effect
Pathway relationship
Efficiency value
LLCI
ULCI
P value
Percentage (%)
The mediating effect: Self-efficacy - Professional identity - Beliefs and attitudes about their prescriptive authority0.63900.35430.9849-54.46
Direct effect: Self-efficacy - Beliefs and attitudes about their prescriptive authority0.53430.25440.81420.000245.54
Total effect: Self-efficacy - Beliefs and attitudes about their prescriptive authority1.17330.94901.39760.0000100.00