Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2021. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
World J Clin Oncol. Sep 24, 2021; 12(9): 823-832
Published online Sep 24, 2021. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v12.i9.823
Features of primary pancreatic lymphoma: A bi-institutional review with an emphasis on typical and atypical imaging features
Nicole Segaran, Kumaresan Sandrasegaran, Catherine Devine, Mindy X Wang, Chintan Shah, Dhakshinamoorthy Ganeshan
Nicole Segaran, Kumaresan Sandrasegaran, Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ 85054, United States
Catherine Devine, Mindy X Wang, Chintan Shah, Dhakshinamoorthy Ganeshan, Department of Diagnostic Imaging, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, United States
Author contributions: Segaran N performed data analysis, and wrote the manuscript; Sandrasegaran K, and Ganeshan D designed the research, performed data collection and edited the manuscript; Shah C, and Devine C performed data collection and edited the manuscript; Wang MX contributed to study design and edited the manuscript.
Institutional review board statement: The study was reviewed and approved separately by the Institutional Review Boards of University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer and Mayo Clinic of Arizona.
Informed consent statement: As this is a retrospective review that involves no diagnostic or therapeutic intervention, as well as no direct patient contact, IRB permission was obtained with waiver of informed consent and waiver of authorization to use and review patient information.
Conflict-of-interest statement: The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Data sharing statement: No additional data is available.
Open-Access: This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Corresponding author: Dhakshinamoorthy Ganeshan, MD, Associate Professor, Department of Diagnostic Imaging, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd., Houston, TX 77030, United States. dganeshan@mdanderson.org
Received: April 29, 2021
Peer-review started: April 29, 2021
First decision: June 16, 2021
Revised: June 29, 2021
Accepted: August 10, 2021
Article in press: August 10, 2021
Published online: September 24, 2021
Processing time: 140 Days and 18.2 Hours
ARTICLE HIGHLIGHTS
Research background

Primary pancreatic lymphoma (PPL) is a rare neoplasm. The ability to differentiate PPL from other pancreatic malignancies including pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is important for appropriate management. However, the nonspecific characteristics currently associated with PPL and a lack of information regarding PPL’s distinctive imaging features makes diagnosis difficult.

Research motivation

Identifying typical and atypical features of PPL on computed tomography (CT), as well as other diagnostic features that may differentiate PPL from its mimics, may enable definitive diagnosis. The discovery of features which distinguish PPL from PDAC early-on is critical to avoid unnecessary surgery.

Research objectives

This study aims to evaluate the typical and atypical CT imaging appearances of PPL. In addition, it distinguishes various clinical and laboratory markers which may be useful to identify PPL. An emphasis was placed on differentiating PPL from PDAC, which can be difficult to do using the current characteristics associated with PPL.

Research methods

Radiology, clinical, and pathology databases from two institutions were searched for reports between January 2000 and December 2020 containing the strings “pancreas lymphoma” or “pancreatic lymphoma”. The exclusion criteria were: (1) Lymphoma with mediastinal or pelvic adenopathy, bone marrow or hepatosplenic involvement which were considered to be systemic lymphoma and not PPL; (2) Pancreatic tumors suspected to be lymphoma on CT and later biopsy-proven to be another diagnosis on histological examination; (3) Subjects without a pretreatment multiphasic CT examination; and (4) Subjects whose medical records were not available of review. Multislice CT scans of the abdomen were viewed in the pre-contrast, arterial, venous, and delayed phases. The clinical presentation, management, laboratory findings, and imaging features of all included patients (n = 29) were evaluated.

Research results

All twenty-nine subjects were symptomatic, but only 14% demonstrated B symptoms and 24% demonstrated obstructive jaundice. Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels were elevated in 17 of the 21 cases for which LDH levels were recorded (81%), however cancer antigen 19-9 (CA 19-9) levels were within normal limits for 18 out of the 20 cases for which values were recorded (90%). Pancreatic ductal dilation was absent in 83% of cases and no patients presented pancreatic atrophy. Atypical features of PPL included pancreatic bile duct dilation (17%), common bile duct (CBD) dilation (41%), necrosis (10%), and infiltration of the mesenteric root (14%). Size did not impact the prevalence of pancreatic and CBD dilation, necrosis, or mesenteric root infiltration (P = 0.525, P = 0.294, P = 0.543, and P = 0.097, respectively).

Research conclusions

The decreased prevalence of obstructive jaundice, elevated CA 19-9 levels, pancreatic ductal dilation, and pancreatic atrophy, as well as the increased elevation of LDH levels, encasement of the small mesenteric artery and/or vein without invasion or stenosis, and lymphadenopathy limited to the peripancreatic region, may be useful for distinguish PPL from its mimics, such as PDAC. However, in addition to the occasional appearance of pancreatic ductal dilation, this study identified multiple atypical features of PPL including the presence of CBD dilation, necrosis, and infiltration of the mesenteric root.

Research perspectives

Prospective studies with larger cohorts must be conducted to support the findings of this paper and the potential use of its highlighted imaging and clinical features for definitive diagnosis of PPL. In addition, there is a need for direct comparison of the frequency of these features in PPL vs PDAC, to determine how useful they are in differentiating the two entities.