Copyright
©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Radiol. Jun 28, 2016; 8(6): 610-617
Published online Jun 28, 2016. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v8.i6.610
Published online Jun 28, 2016. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v8.i6.610
Table 1 Final pathological diagnosis of 235 breast lesions and breast imaging reporting and data system after contrast- enhanced ultrasound
| Histopathological diagnosis | BI-RADS after CEUS | Total | ||||
| 3 | 4A | 4B | 4C | 5 | ||
| Benign lesions | 139 | |||||
| Fibroadenoma | 47 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 53 | |
| Fibrocystic mastopathy | 34 | 1 | 35 | |||
| Complex sclerosing adenosis | 2 | 2 | 1 | 5 | ||
| Hyperplasia | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 | ||
| Chronic mastitis | 12 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 21 | |
| Granulomatous mastitis | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 | ||
| Intraductal papilloma | 4 | 2 | 3 | 9 | ||
| Benign phyllodes tumor | 2 | 1 | 3 | |||
| Hamartoma | 1 | 1 | 2 | |||
| Radial scar | 2 | 2 | ||||
| Bolus material after operation | 1 | 1 | ||||
| Malignant lesions | 96 | |||||
| IDC | 7 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 62 | 78 |
| DCIS | 2 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 9 | |
| Mucinous carcinoma | 2 | 1 | 3 | |||
| Infiltrating lobular carcinoma | 2 | 2 | ||||
| Diffused large B-cell lymphoma | 1 | 1 | 2 | |||
| Malignant phyllodes tumor | 1 | 1 | ||||
| Solid neuroendocrine carcinoma | 1 | 1 | ||||
| Total | 235 | |||||
Table 2 Enhancement patterns of invasive malignant tumors classified as breast lesions and breast imaging reporting and data system S 3
| No. | Size (mm) | LN | Histology | Mammography |
| 1 | 18 × 15 | Negative | IDC (triple negative) | Hyperplasia fibrocystic |
| 2 | 14.6 × 10.7 | Negative | IDC (triple negative) | Mastopathy |
| 3 | 12 × 8 | Negative | IDC (HER2) | Solid lesion |
| 4 | 19 × 15 | Negative | Mixed mucinous carcinoma(Luminal A) | Hyperplasia |
| 5 | 25 × 17 | Negative | IDC (triple negative) | Phyllodes tumor |
| 6 | 30 × 15 | Positive | IDC (triple negative) | Solid lesion |
| 7 | 30 × 25 | Negative | IDC (Luminal B) | Without |
| 8 | 18.8 × 15.7 | Negative | IDC (triple negative) | Solid lesion |
| 9 | 38 × 37 | Negative | Diffused B-cell lymphoma | Without |
| 10 | 11 × 10 | Negative | Mucinous carcinoma | Without |
| 11 | 17 × 14 | Negative | Mucinous carcinoma | Adenoma |
Table 3 Enhancement patterns of invasive malignant tumors classified as breast lesions and breast imaging reporting and data system S 4A (false negative lesions)
| No. | Enhancement patterns | ||||||
| Time | Intensity | Scope after enhancement | Direction | Craw-like pattern | Nourishing vessel | Shape after enhancement | |
| 1 | Rapid | Hyper | Equal | Complex | Absent | Absent | Regular |
| 2 | Synchronous | Iso | Equal | Complex | Absent | Absent | Irregular |
| 3 | Rapid | Hyper | Smaller | Centripetal | Absent | Absent | Regular |
| 4 | Rapid | Hyper | Equal | Complex | Absent | Absent | Regular |
| 5 | Rapid | Hyper | Equal | Centripetal | Absent | Absent | Regular |
| 6 | Rapid | Hyper | Larger | Complex | Absent | Present | Regular |
| 7 | Rapid | Hyper | Larger | Complex | Absent | Absent | Irregular |
| 8 | Synchronous | Hyper | Equal | Complex | Absent | Absent | Regular |
| 9 | Slow | Hypo | Equal | Centripetal | Absent | Absent | Regular |
| 10 | Rapid | Hyper | Smaller | Complex | Absent | Present | Irregular |
| 11 | Slow | Hypo | Smaller | Centripetal | Absent | Absent | Regular |
Table 4 The effect of increasing biopsy thresholds on biopsy rates, cancer-to-biopsy yields, and malignancies missed
| BI-RADS category | Biopsy rate (%) | Invasive cancers recommended for 6 mo follow-up (%) | Cancer-to-biopsy yield (%) |
| If biopsy performed on all BI-RADS4 lesions | 235 (100) | 0 (0) | 96/235 (40.85) |
| > BI-RADS 3 (2%-94%) | 119 (50.64) | 7 (2.98) | 87/119 (73.11) |
| > BI-RADS 4A (10%-94%) | 99 (42.13) | 11 (4.68) | 82/99 (82.83) |
| > BI-RADS 4B (50%-94%) | 86 (36.60) | 15 (7.66) | 78/86 (90.70) |
| > BI-RADS 4C (95%-100%) | 74 (31.49) | 21 (9.79) | 69/74 (93.24) |
- Citation: Luo J, Chen JD, Chen Q, Yue LX, Zhou G, Lan C, Li Y, Wu CH, Lu JQ. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound improved performance of breast imaging reporting and data system evaluation of critical breast lesions. World J Radiol 2016; 8(6): 610-617
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1949-8470/full/v8/i6/610.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4329/wjr.v8.i6.610
