BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Observational Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Radiol. Sep 28, 2025; 17(9): 112173
Published online Sep 28, 2025. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v17.i9.112173
Table 1 Baseline characteristics of patients, mean ± SD/n (%)
Baseline characteristic
Pre-eclampsia group (n = 42)
Normal group (n = 300)
P value
Age (years)31.0 ± 530.0 ± 50.23
    Range28-3820-40
BMI (kg/m2)24.29 ± 1.5923.09 ± 1.870.15
GA at enrollment (weeks)11.43 ± 0.6511.66 ± 0.670.08
Parity
    Nulliparous18 (42.9)180 (60.0)0.0751
    Primiparous16 (38.1)70 (23.3)
    Multiparous8 (19.0)50 (16.7)
MAP (mmHg)94.1 ± 14.387.9 ± 6.50.008a
    Range78-12577-118
Table 2 Distribution of study participants according to gravida and parity status, n (%)
Parameters
Groups
P value
Pre-eclampsia (n = 42)
Normal (n = 300)
Gravida110 (23.8)126 (42.0)0.026
210 (23.8)94 (31.3)
322 (52.4)80 (26.7)
Parity018 (42.9)180 (60.0)0.0748
116 (38.1)70 (23.3)
28 (19.0)50 (16.7)
Table 3 Timing and severity of preeclampsia in relation to uterine artery Doppler findings (n = 42), mean ± SD/n (%)
Parameter
Early-onset severe PE (n = 11)
Early-onset mild PE (n = 7)
Late-onset severe PE (n = 13)
Late-onset mild PE (n = 11)
Total PE cases (%)26.216.731.026.2
Uterine artery PI 2.03 ± 0.011.97 ± 0.011.94 ± 0.021.91 ± 0.04
Bilateral notching9 (81.8)5 (71.4)8 (61.5)4 (36.4)
GA at diagnosis (weeks)29.3 ± 1.430.9 ± 1.035.8 ± 0.936.4 ± 1.1
P value< 0.001
Table 4 Pregnancy outcome of the study participants, mean ± SD/n (%)

Pre-eclampsia group (n = 42)
Normal group (n = 300)
P value
Gestational age at birth (weeks)34.4 ± 2.037.9 ± 1.6< 0.001a
Mode of deliveryVaginal14 (33.3)198 (66)< 0.001a
LSCS28 (66.7)102 (34)
Fetal complicationsLBW26 (61.9)28 (9.3)< 0.001a
NICU admission32 (76.1)27(9)< 0.001a
Meconium-stained liquor1 (2.3)4 (1.3)0.611
Table 5 Uterine artery notching among the study participants, n (%)
Uterine artery notching
Groups
P value
Pre-eclampsia (n = 42)
Normal (n = 300)
Present37 (88)48 (16)< 0.001a
    Unilateral notching11 (29.7)32 (66.6)
    Bilateral notching26 (70.3)16 (33.4)
Absent5 (12)252 (84)
Table 6 Comparison of uterine artery Doppler indices
Parameter
Preeclampsia (n = 42)
Normal (n = 300)
P value
Right UA-PI1.955 ± 0.351.481 ± 0.53< 0.001a
Left UA-PI1.936 ± 0.391.467 ± 0.58
Mean PI1.9455 ± 0.361.4740 ± 0.52
Right UA-RI0.750 ± 0.120.551 ± 0.21
Left UA-RI0.746 ± 0.140.516 ± 0.23
Mean RI0.748 ± 0.130.5335 ± 0.22
Table 7 Sensitivity analysis-model excluding resistive index
Predictor
Adjusted OR
95%CI
P value
PI (per 0.1 unit)1.211.13-1.29< 0.001
BMI (per 1 kg/m2)1.421.15-1.740.001
MAP (per 1 mmHg)1.061.01-1.100.009
Table 8 Multivariable logistic regression for prediction of preeclampsia
Predictor
Adjusted OR
95%CI
P value
PI (per 0.1 unit)1.070.96-1.200.001
RI (per 0.1 unit)1.471.07-2.01
BMI (per 1 kg/m2)1.431.16-1.76
MAP (per 1 mmHg)1.051.01-1.100.014
Table 9 Receiver operating characteristic analysis for pulsatility index as predictor of pre-eclampsia
Parameter
Value
AUC0.896
P value< 0.001
Cut-off1.622
95%CI (sensitivity)0.66-0.82
95%CI (specificity)0.78-0.91
Sensitivity75.0%
Specificity86.0%
PPV84.27%
NPV77.48%
Diagnostic accuracy80.50%
Table 10 Receiver operating characteristic analysis resistive index as predictor of pre-eclampsia
Parameter
Value
AUC0.920
P value< 0.001
Cut-off0.66
95%CI (sensitivity)0.54-0.73
95%CI (specificity)0.86-0.97
Sensitivity64.0%
Specificity93.0%
PPV90.14%
NPV72.09%
Diagnostic accuracy78.50%