BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Retrospective Study Open Access
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2025. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
World J Radiol. Nov 28, 2025; 17(11): 113153
Published online Nov 28, 2025. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v17.i11.113153
Variations in the spatial relationship between the hyoid bone and the carotid arteries and their clinical significance
Nektaria Karangeli, George Triantafyllou, Panagiotis Papadopoulos-Manolarakis, Alexandros Samolis, Maria Piagkou, Department of Anatomy, School of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens 11527, Attikí, Greece
George Triantafyllou, Maria Piagkou, “VARIANTIS” Research Laboratory, Department of Clinical Anatomy, Mazovian Academy in Płock, Płock 09-402, Poland
Panagiotis Papadopoulos-Manolarakis, Department of Neurosurgery, General Hospital of Nikaia-Piraeus, Athens 18454, Attikí, Greece
Nikolaos-Achilleas Arkoudis, Georgios Velonakis, Research Unit of Radiology and Medical Imaging, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens 11528, Greece
Nikolaos-Achilleas Arkoudis, Georgios Velonakis, Second Department of Radiology, General University Hospital “Attikon”, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens 12462, Chaidari, Greece
ORCID number: Nektaria Karangeli (0009-0009-3251-2434); George Triantafyllou (0009-0001-0122-2436); Panagiotis Papadopoulos-Manolarakis (0009-0008-5662-8354); Nikolaos-Achilleas Arkoudis (0000-0002-0783-5700); Georgios Velonakis (0000-0002-0050-284X); Maria Piagkou (0000-0002-4831-8005).
Co-corresponding authors: George Triantafyllou and Nikolaos-Achilleas Arkoudis.
Author contributions: Karangeli N was responsible for project development, data collection and management; Triantafyllou G contributed to conceptualization; Karangeli N, Triantafyllou G, Papadopoulos-Manolarakis P, Arkoudis NA, Velonakis G, Samolis A, and Piagkou M contributed to data analysis and manuscript writing; Maria Piagkou oversaw the project (supervision); Triantafyllou G and Arkoudis NA they contributed equally to this article, they are the co-corresponding authors of this manuscript; and all authors thoroughly reviewed and endorsed the final manuscript.
Institutional review board statement: This study was approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of General Hospital of Nikaia-Piraeus, approval No. 56485.
Informed consent statement: Informed consent was obtained from the patients enrolled in the current study.
Conflict-of-interest statement: All the authors report no relevant conflicts of interest for this article.
Data sharing statement: All the data are available upon reasonable request to the authors.
Open Access: This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: https://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Corresponding author: Nikolaos-Achilleas Arkoudis, MD, PhD, Research Unit of Radiology and Medical Imaging, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 19 Papadiamantopoulou, Athens 11528, Greece. nick.arkoudis@gmail.com
Received: August 18, 2025
Revised: September 3, 2025
Accepted: November 7, 2025
Published online: November 28, 2025
Processing time: 102 Days and 8.8 Hours

Abstract
BACKGROUND

The topography between the common carotid artery (CA), internal CA, and external CA (ECA) with the greater horn of the hyoid bone (GHHB) is of particular importance for anatomists, radiologists and neck surgeons.

AIM

To investigate these topographical relationships emphasizing anatomical classification, sexual dimorphism, and clinical significance.

METHODS

A retrospective study was performed on 224 computed tomography angiographies from a cohort comprising 161 male and 63 female patients, with a mean age of 63.2 years. Multiplanar and three-dimensional reconstructions were executed utilizing Horos software. The spatial relationships between the CA and hyoid bone were categorized based on the 12-type classification system delineated by Manta et al in 2023. The data were subsequently stratified by sex and laterality.

RESULTS

Type 0 (no arterial contact with the GHHB) was the most common configuration (46.9%), followed by type VI (ECA lateral to GHHB, 23.9%) and type VIII (internal CA and ECA lateral to GHHB, 13.2%). Bilateral symmetry was present in 54.02% of cases, mainly in males. Statistically significant sex-based differences were found (P = 0.012), while laterality was not significant (P = 0.779).

CONCLUSION

Carotid–hyoid topography displays significant anatomical variation with clinically essential patterns. Non-null variants, such as types VI and VIII, may increase the risk of dynamic carotid compression, especially in younger patients with cryptogenic cerebrovascular symptoms. Recognizing these variants during preoperative imaging is crucial to minimize surgical risk and inform patient care.

Key Words: External carotid artery; Internal carotid artery; Hyoid bone; Topography; Variation

Core Tip: The spatial relationship between the hyoid bone and carotid arteries is highly variable and may predispose patients to vascular compression, stroke, or surgical complications. This retrospective computed tomography angiography-based study of 224 patients highlights common topographical variants, their sex-related distribution, and clinical implications. Recognition of these carotid-hyoid configurations in preoperative imaging can aid in preventing iatrogenic injury, improving diagnosis in cryptogenic cerebrovascular events, and guiding safer surgical planning.



INTRODUCTION

A complex interplay of muscular, skeletal, and neurovascular elements defines the anatomy of the head and neck. Among these, the vascular structures exhibit considerable morphological and topographical variability, often with critical implications during diagnostic assessments and surgical interventions[1-6].

The common carotid artery (CCA) bifurcates into the internal carotid artery (ICA) and the external carotid artery (ECA), typically around the C3-C5 vertebral levels. However, this variation can be significant across individuals[7]. The ECA supplies the extracranial tissues of the head and neck, whereas the ICA predominantly serves intracranial structures, including cerebral circulation[8].

During their cervical course, the ICA and ECA exhibit distinct spatial relationships with bony landmarks, including the hyoid bone (HB), styloid process, and mandible. These relationships are not merely anatomical curiosities - they carry potential clinical consequences. Positional anomalies can contribute to vascular compression, altered hemodynamics, or surgical hazards during procedures in the parapharyngeal, retropharyngeal, or suprahyoid spaces[2,9-11]. However, the current literature lacks anatomical classifications and clear linking to clinical symptoms.

Our previous study, based on 100 computed tomography angiography cases, demonstrated that while HB often lies close to carotid arteries (CAs), its morphometric parameters (e.g., horn length or angle) did not significantly influence arterial positioning[12]. However, given the increasing reports of functional carotid compression by the HB in cases of transient ischemic attack (TIA) or unexplained cerebrovascular symptoms[13-15], further investigation in a larger cohort is warranted.

The objective of this radioanatomical study was to examine the topographical relationship between the CAs and the HB in a significantly larger dataset, with a focus on variant classification, sex differences, and potential clinical relevance.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study analyzed 224 computed tomography angiography scans archived at the General Hospital of Nikaia-Piraeus, following approval by the institutional ethics committee, approval No. 56485. The sample consisted of 224 patients (161 males and 63 females), aged 20 years to 89 years (mean age, 63.2 years). All scans were acquired using a 128-slice SOMATOM go. Top scanner (Siemens Healthineers), with patients positioned supine and the head in a neutral alignment. A 30% iodine-based contrast medium (60 mL) was administered intravenously at a rate of 4.0-4.5 mL/second. Inclusion criteria were excellent quality of the scan, without pathological processes distorting the anatomy of the area. Scans exhibiting inadequate image quality or anatomical distortion due to pathology (e.g., tumor, trauma, congenital malformations) were excluded, as per the exclusion criteria defined in previous studies[9]. Image processing and analysis were performed using Horos software (Horos Project). Each dataset was reviewed in axial, coronal, and sagittal planes, with additional three-dimensional reconstructions generated for enhanced anatomical assessment.

The carotid bifurcation (CB) was first classified as either suprahyoid or infrahyoid, based on its vertical relation to the greater horn of the HB (GHHB) observed in sagittal views. Subsequently, the topographical relationships between the Cas - CCA, ICA, and ECA - and the GHHB were assessed in axial and 3D views. These spatial configurations were categorized using the twelve-type classification system introduced by Manta et al[2]. This system includes types 0 through XII, describing whether arteries pass medial, lateral, or posterior to the GHHB, or have no contact (null Type 0). Each type reflects distinct topographical variants that may influence clinical outcomes and surgical planning.

Demographic and anatomical data were stratified by side (left vs right) and sex (male vs female). Categorical variables were analyzed using the χ2 test for unpaired comparisons and McNemar’s test for paired variables. All statistical analyses were conducted using IBM SPSS Statistics for macOS, Version 29 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, United States), with a P value < 0.05 considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

Among the 448 heminecks evaluated (224 patients), 46.9% demonstrated no direct spatial relationship between the CAs and the HB (type 0). All the observed relationships are presented in Figures 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7. The most common non-null configuration was type VI, in which the ECA was lateral to the GHHB, observed in 23.9% of sides (Figure 3). This was followed by type VIII (both ICA and ECA lateral to the GHHB) in 13.2% (Figure 5), and type IX (ICA medial to the GHHB) in 10% (Figure 6). Less frequent configurations included type X (CB lateral to GHHB, 3.6%) (Figure 7), type XI (ECA lateral, ICA medial, 1.1%) (Figure 2), type I (ECA medial, 0.4%) (Figure 1), type XII (ECA medial, ICA lateral, 0.4%) (Figure 4), and type IV (CCA medial, 0.2%) (Figure 2). Types II, III, V, and VII were not observed in this cohort (Table 1).

Figure 1
Figure 1 Type I spatial configuration (right-sided). A: 3D volume rendering shows the external carotid artery medial to the greater horn of the hyoid bone, while the internal carotid artery remains lateral; B: Corresponding axial computed tomography angiography slice confirming the same relationship. ECA: External carotid artery; GHHB: Greater horn of the hyoid bone; HB: Hyoid bone; ICA: Internal carotid artery.
Figure 2
Figure 2 Type IV (right) and type XI (left) configuration. A: 3D reconstruction shows the right common carotid artery positioned medial to the greater horn of hyoid bone (type IV) and the left external carotid artery lateral with internal carotid artery medial to greater horn of hyoid bone (type XI); B: Axial computed tomography images confirm the asymmetric carotid-hyoid relationships. ICA: Internal carotid artery; ECA: External carotid artery; CCA: Common carotid artery; GHHB: Greater horn of hyoid bone; HB: Hyoid bone.
Figure 3
Figure 3 Type VI bilateral configuration. A: 3D reconstruction shows the external carotid arteries bilaterally lateral to the greater horn of hyoid bone; B: The axial view demonstrates the symmetry of this type VI pattern. ICA: Internal carotid artery; ECA: External carotid artery; GHHB: Greater horn of hyoid bone; HB: Hyoid bone.
Figure 4
Figure 4 Type VII (right) and type XII (left). A: The 3D rendering reveals that the right external carotid artery and internal carotid artery are both located lateral to the greater horn of hyoid bone (type VII), whereas on the left, the external carotid artery is medial, and the internal carotid artery is lateral to the greater horn of hyoid bone (type XII); B: Axial computed tomography confirms the described relationships. ICA: Internal carotid artery; ECA: External carotid artery; GHHB: Greater horn of hyoid bone; HB: Hyoid bone.
Figure 5
Figure 5 Type VIII bilateral configuration. A: 3D volume-rendered image depicts both internal carotid artery and external carotid artery lateral to the greater horn of hyoid bone bilaterally; B: Axial computed tomography angiography confirms this symmetric type VIII presentation. ICA: Internal carotid artery; ECA: External carotid artery; GHHB: Greater horn of hyoid bone; HB: Hyoid bone.
Figure 6
Figure 6 Type IX bilateral configuration. A: 3D reconstruction shows the internal carotid artery positioned medially to the greater horn of hyoid bone on both sides; B: Axial computed tomography angiography illustrates bilateral type IX anatomy. ICA: Internal carotid artery; GHHB: Greater horn of hyoid bone; HB: Hyoid bone; CCA: Common carotid artery.
Figure 7
Figure 7 Type X bilateral configuration. A: 3D reconstruction demonstrating the carotid bifurcation located lateral to the greater horn of hyoid bone on both sides; B: Axial view highlights bilateral type X relationship. CB: Carotid bifurcation; GHHB: Greater horn of hyoid bone; HB: Hyoid bone.
Table 1 The topographical types are categorized by sides and sexes, n (%).
Topographical types
Total
Left
Right
P value
Female
Male
P value
Type 0210 (46.9)1071030.779691410.012a
Type I2 (0.4)0202
Type II0 (0)0000
Type III0 (0)0000
Type IV1 (0.2)0110
Type V0 (0)0000
Type VI107 (23.9)50572978
Type VII1 (0.2)0101
Type VIII59 (13.2)28311247
Type IX45 (10)2421738
Type X16 (3.6)106412
Type XI5 (1.1)3232
Type XII2 (0.4)2011

Sex- and side-specific distributions depicted the following results: No significant association was found with side laterality (McNemar’s test, P = 0.779); however, sex-based differences were significant (χ2 test, P = 0.012). Males showed higher frequencies of types I, VI, and VIII, whereas females were more likely to present with types 0, IV, and IX through XII.

Analysis of bilateral symmetry revealed that 121 patients (54.02%) exhibited symmetrical carotid-hyoid topography. The most frequent symmetric configuration was bilateral type 0 (70 cases), followed by type VI (31 cases), type VIII (10 cases), type IX (9 cases), and type X (1 case). No bilateral cases were observed for the other configurations.

Bilateral symmetry was notably more common among males. Of the 70 bilateral null-type cases, 46 were male. Similarly, 25 of 31 type VI, 9 of 10 type VIII, and 7 of 9 type IX symmetric cases occurred in male patients. The single bilateral type X case was also male. No bilateral instances of types I, IV, XI, or XII were identified.

DISCUSSION

When comparing our findings with those reported by Manta et al[2], several notable differences and similarities become apparent. The proportion of null cases in our sample was lower (46.9%) compared to that reported by Manta et al[2] (57.14%), indicating possible variations in population anatomy, imaging protocols, or classification criteria. Both studies identified type VI as the most common anatomical pattern. However, differences emerged, such as the higher frequency of type VIII in our cohort vs its lower ranking in Manta et al[2] dataset. Conversely, types II, III, and V - found in Manta et al[2] study - were not observed in our analysis (Figure 8). These differences may be due to ethnic, geographical, or methodological factors and deserve further investigation across multiple centers (Table 2).

Figure 8
Figure 8 Schematic representation of all topographical patterns between the external carotid artery, internal carotid artery or common carotid artery with the hyoid bone. ICA: Internal carotid artery; ECA: External carotid artery; CCA: Common carotid artery; CB: Carotid bifurcation.
Table 2 A summary of the observed types, classification, comparison with the previous study and comments about the clinical significance.
Topographical types
Anatomical relationship
Current study
Manta et al[2]
Comments
Type 0Carotid arteries posterior to the tip of the GHHB46.9%57.14%Null type
Type IECA medial to GHHB0.4%0.34%Low clinical penetrance, hemodynamically not significant carotid artery compression
Type IIICA medial to GHHB0%0.34%Low clinical penetrance, associated with reported cases of TIAs in systemic prothrombotic conditions or repetitive mechanical neck stress situations
Type IIIBoth ICA and ECA medial to GHHB0%1.02%Low clinical penetrance, hemodynamically not significant carotid artery compression
Type IVCCA medial to GHHB0.2%1.02%Low clinical penetrance, associated with neurological deficits contralateral to the affected vessel in elderly patients
Type VCB medial to GHHB0%0.34%Low clinical penetrance, hemodynamically not significant carotid artery compression
Type VIECA lateral to GHHB23.9%20.41%High anatomical prevalence, not implicated in any reported cases of TIA or stroke
Type VIIICA lateral to GHHB0.2%0%Low clinical penetrance, hemodynamically not significant carotid artery compression
Type VIIIBoth ICA and ECA lateral to GHHB13.2%3.74%High clinical penetrance, associated with significant neurological symptomatology, including hemiparesis, hemiplegia, aphasia, cervical pain, and loss of somatosensory function
Type IXCCA lateral to GHHB10%8.5%Low clinical penetrance, associated with the formation of a carotid pseudoaneurysm
Type XCB lateral to GHHB3.6%6.46%Low clinical penetrance, associated with the dissection of a carotid pseudoaneurysm
Type XIICA medial and ECA lateral to GHHB1.1%0.34%High clinical penetrance, involving cases of cryptogenic strokes or unexplained TIAs in younger patients
Type XIIECA medial and ICA lateral to GHHB0.4%0.34%Low clinical penetrance, associated with neurological deficits contralateral to the affected vessel in elderly patients

Sexual dimorphism became a significant factor. Our data revealed statistical differences between male and female distributions, which partially align with Manta et al’s report[2]. The female predominance in types IV, X, and XI, and male dominance in types I, VI, and VIII, support the idea that sex influences vascular topography. However, these sex-related results should be taken into careful consideration due to the sex imbalance of our sample. These patterns suggest hormonal, developmental, or biomechanical effects and require further targeted biomechanical and morphometric research.

We reviewed the current literature for clinical references to carotid-hyoid relationships (Table 2). Several case reports within the existing literature have described a spectrum of carotid-hyoid topographical variants, underscoring both the anatomical intricacy and the potential clinical ramifications of these configurations. Within the reviewed bibliography, documented clinical cases have included two instances of type II, two of type IV, six of type VIII, one of type IX, two of type X, eight of type XI, and one of type XII, as per the classification system[13,14,16-33]. Strikingly, the majority of these cases involved young patients who presented with TIA in the absence of traditional cardiovascular or systemic risk factors, thereby prompting detailed vascular imaging and subsequent identification of atypical carotid-hyoid spatial relationships as potential etiological contributors. The reported TIA symptomatology commonly included hemiparesis affecting the ipsilateral upper and lower limbs, leading clinicians to consider mechanical or dynamic extrinsic arterial compromise in the differential diagnosis[24,31].

Notably, types I, III, V, VI, and VII have not been documented in any clinical case reports to date. This absence may be indicative of low clinical penetrance, or may alternatively reflect a diminished propensity of these configurations to induce hemodynamically significant CA compression. However, the possibility of subclinical or context-dependent risk cannot be excluded, and warrants further investigation - particularly under dynamic conditions such as cervical rotation, swallowing, or phonation.

Of particular interest is type VI, which emerged as the most frequently encountered non-null configuration in both our dataset and that of Manta et al[2]. Despite its high anatomical prevalence, type VI has not been implicated in any reported cases of TIA or stroke, suggesting that this configuration may be inherently benign with respect to cerebrovascular compromise. One possible explanation for the clinical silence of type VI is that the lateral positioning of the ECA relative to the HB places it at lower risk of compression during swallowing or cervical motion, compared to medial or combined medial-lateral configurations. This apparent paradox between anatomical frequency and clinical silence raises important considerations regarding the threshold at which spatial proximity translates into pathological interaction, and highlights the need for functional imaging studies and longitudinal clinical correlation to distinguish anatomical variants of no consequence from those with latent pathogenic potential[2].

In the context of type II carotid-hyoid configurations, where the ICA lies medial to the GHHB, both published case reports to date involve young female patients, highlighting a possible sex- and age-related anatomical susceptibility[16,17]. Tokunaga et al[17] reported a patient with transient left hemiparesis and ipsilateral sensory disturbance, in the setting of underlying Sjögren’s syndrome. Dynamic carotid ultrasonography revealed positional displacement of the right ICA, with significant shifts observed during head rotation and deglutition, implicating a mechanical interaction between the HB and the CA. In a separate report, Kho et al[16] described a young female patient who, in addition to transient hemiparesis and sensory deficits, exhibited dysphagia. Following vascular imaging, the aberrant medial positioning of the ICA relative to the HB was identified. Notably, symptom onset was temporally associated with a behavioral habit of frequent, rapid side-to-side cervical movements described as “neck clicking”. This repetitive mechanical motion likely exacerbated dynamic ICA compression, resulting in neurological symptoms attributable to transient arterial insufficiency or microembolism. Together, these cases underscore the clinical relevance of type II configurations, particularly when compounded by systemic prothrombotic conditions or repetitive mechanical neck stress, and suggest that even anatomically rare variants may have significant cerebrovascular implications under specific dynamic or behavioral circumstances.

In cases of type IV carotid-hyoid configuration, wherein the CCA is positioned medially to the GHHB, the literature documents two clinically significant cases, both involving 70-year-old individuals who presented with neurological deficits contralateral to the affected vessel, and in both instances, pathology was localized to the right CCA[13,18]. In the first case, the patient exhibited mild left-sided hemiparesis with preserved sensory function but demonstrated disorientation to place, attributed to a 90% stenosis of the right CCA[18]. In the second report, the patient presented with left-sided hemiplegia accompanied by motor aphasia. Imaging revealed an unstable atherosclerotic plaque within the right CCA, presumed to be the source of embolic eve. These cases suggest that the type IV anatomical configuration may predispose the CCA to mechanical stress or compression, potentially contributing to plaque instability and subsequent cerebrovascular ischemia. Although direct causality remains speculative, the medial displacement of the CCA relative to the hyoid apparatus may represent a contributory factor in cases of otherwise unexplained common carotid pathology, particularly in elderly patients[13,18].

In the context of type VIII carotid-hyoid configuration, where both the external and internal CAs (ECA and ICA, respectively) are positioned lateral to the GHHB, multiple case reports have documented significant neurological symptomatology, including hemiparesis, hemiplegia, aphasia, cervical pain, and loss of somatosensory function. These events are frequently attributed to TIAs, potentially precipitated by dynamic vascular compression during cervical movement or elevated intrathoracic pressure[19,23]. Behavioral and lifestyle factors appear to play a contributory role in some of these cases. Notably, activities such as heavy weightlifting and golfing - which involve abrupt or repetitive cervical rotation and strain - have been associated with the onset of TIA symptoms in patients exhibiting type VIII anatomy[20,22]. In one case, the ICA entrapment observed in conjunction with type VIII was exacerbated by both an elongated GHHB and a coexisting elongated styloid process, although the styloid-hyoid complex appeared to be the principal mechanical factor in arterial compromise[20]. In our study, type VIII was observed in 13.2% of cases, making it one of the most prevalent non-null configurations. Given both its relatively high frequency in the general population and its documented association with symptomatic cases in the literature, this variant should raise clinical caution, especially in patients presenting with unexplained cerebrovascular symptoms.

Schneider et al[25] reported a case of carotid pseudoaneurysm formation associated with a type IX carotid-hyoid configuration, characterized by lateral displacement of the CCA relative to the GHHB. The patient was asymptomatic but presented with a palpable cervical mass, prompting further vascular imaging. The investigation revealed that the chronic mechanical irritation of the arterial wall - due to its close spatial relationship with the GHHB - had likely contributed to localized inflammation and subsequent pseudoaneurysm development. The patient’s history of heavy weightlifting was identified as a potential exacerbating factor, amplifying repetitive microtrauma at the site of arterial-bony contact.

Type X carotid-hyoid configurations, in which the CB is positioned laterally to the GHHB, have been implicated in clinically relevant vascular pathology. Ye et al[27] described a case involving a patient who presented with right-sided hemiparesis, in whom imaging revealed two cystic lesions with internal calcifications and a pronounced spatial proximity between the GHHB and the ICA. A dissecting aneurysm of the ICA was identified, which the authors attributed to mechanical stress and chronic irritation associated with an elongated HB abutting the arterial wall[2].

Type XI carotid-hyoid configurations, characterized by the ECA positioned laterally and the ICA medially to the GHHB, appear to be the most frequently represented anatomical variant in the published clinical literature concerning TIAs. All reported cases have presented with classic focal neurological deficits[14,26,28-32]. Importantly, these cases span a wide age range, with several involving young adults lacking conventional cardiovascular risk factors, thereby contributing to the broader diagnostic framework of embolic stroke of undetermined source. One particularly illustrative case involved a patient who, in addition to transient neurological symptoms, reported a chronic ipsilateral otalgia lasting over two years, highlighting the possibility of atypical and prolonged prodromal symptoms in carotid-hyoid pathology.

Notably, in the majority of these reports, the CB was found to be situated lower than its typical anatomical location - often at the C3-C4 vertebral level or below. Given both the frequency of type XI in symptomatic individuals and the potential for recurrent or unexplained cerebrovascular events, this configuration warrants heightened clinical attention, particularly in cases of cryptogenic stroke or unexplained TIAs in younger patients[14,31]. Keshelava et al[32] documented a case of type XII (ECA medial, ICA lateral) carotid-hyoid configuration, involving a 70-year-old female patient who presented with left-sided hemiparesis. Management in this case consisted exclusively of anticoagulant therapy, without surgical intervention.

A nuanced understanding of the medial vs lateral displacement of the CAs relative to the GHHB is essential for preoperative planning and intraoperative navigation, especially in anatomically complex or constrained surgical fields. Variants classified as types I-V, where the CAs are positioned medial to the GHHB, are intimately related to the parapharyngeal space. In such configurations, the ICA may lie immediately subjacent to the pharyngeal mucosa, dramatically increasing the risk of iatrogenic vascular injury during procedures such as transoral biopsies, abscess drainage, or resection of pharyngeal tumors - notably in anatomically sensitive regions like the pyriform[1-6]. Furthermore, in otolaryngological surgeries such as tonsillectomy, adenoidectomy, and soft palate repair, patients with medially displaced carotid anatomy may be at elevated risk for catastrophic hemorrhage, pseudoaneurysm formation, or even airway compromise if arterial injury occurs[1,34].

In contrast, types VI-X, characterized by lateral displacement of the carotid vessels, present a different set of challenges. The close spatial relationship between the arteries and the sternocleidomastoid muscle, as well as deeper structures like the posterior belly of the digastric and stylopharyngeus muscles, may lead to increased arterial compression during dynamic head and neck motion and can complicate transcervical surgical approaches to parapharyngeal or retropharyngeal tumors[1,34]. In procedures such as deep lobe parotidectomy or lateral pharyngeal wall access, these variants necessitate heightened intraoperative caution to avoid unintentional vascular compromise. Types XI and XII are distinguished by the presence of arterial structures positioned both laterally and medially, thereby subjecting these variants to a dual spectrum of associated vascular risks.

Finally, aberrant courses of the CAs should always be included in the differential diagnosis of submucosal oropharyngeal masses and atypical pharyngeal presentations, particularly when imaging reveals unexpected vascular contours or displacements. A comprehensive preoperative assessment, ideally including contrast-enhanced CT or MR angiography, is essential in mitigating risks and optimizing outcomes in this anatomically vulnerable region[2,35].

The current study is limited by its moderate sample size and sex imbalance. Additionally, our findings are based on a single-center cohort and may not apply universally. The sex imbalance could have affected our sample and the statistically significant difference identified between female and male patients. Due to the retrospective and anatomical nature of the present study, the patients’ medical history was unknown. Future research should include larger, multicenter, and demographically diverse groups. Incorporating dynamic imaging, functional testing, and long-term clinical follow-up would help better define the accurate risk profile of each topographical variant, while biomechanical and genetic studies will enhance our knowledge for sex- and nationality-based differences.

CONCLUSION

This study highlights the significant diversity of carotid-hyoid relationships and identifies specific spatial patterns with clear clinical implications. Using the classification system of Manta et al[2], we confirmed that type VI is the most common non-null variant; however, its apparent clinical silence contrasts with the pathological potential of less frequent configurations, such as types VIII and XI, which have been linked to TIA s and other vascular complications. Our findings also demonstrate pronounced sexual dimorphism and lateral asymmetry, highlighting the importance of personalized anatomical assessment evaluation. Carotid variants that are displaced medially increase surgical risk, especially in transoral and pharyngeal procedures, while lateralized types may lead to dynamic arterial compression or complicate cervical access routes. Including carotid-hyoid topographical assessment in routine preoperative imaging and clinical decision-making can help prevent iatrogenic injury, improve diagnostic accuracy in cryptogenic stroke, and enhance surgical planning.

Footnotes

Provenance and peer review: Invited article; Externally peer reviewed.

Peer-review model: Single blind

Specialty type: Radiology, nuclear medicine and medical imaging

Country of origin: Greece

Peer-review report’s classification

Scientific Quality: Grade A, Grade B, Grade B, Grade B, Grade C, Grade C

Novelty: Grade A, Grade B, Grade B, Grade B, Grade B, Grade C

Creativity or Innovation: Grade A, Grade B, Grade B, Grade B, Grade B, Grade C

Scientific Significance: Grade A, Grade B, Grade B, Grade B, Grade B, Grade C

P-Reviewer: Papadopoulos VP, MD, PhD, Assistant Professor, Associate Chief Physician, Greece; Shi YC, PhD, China; Zharikov YO, MD, PhD, Associate Professor, Russia S-Editor: Bai Y L-Editor: A P-Editor: Xu J

References
1.  Paulsen F, Tillmann B, Christofides C, Richter W, Koebke J. Curving and looping of the internal carotid artery in relation to the pharynx: frequency, embryology and clinical implications. J Anat. 2000;197 Pt 3:373-381.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 131]  [Cited by in RCA: 153]  [Article Influence: 6.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
2.  Manta MD, Rusu MC, Hostiuc S, Vrapciu AD, Manta BA, Jianu AM. The Carotid-Hyoid Topography Is Variable. Medicina (Kaunas). 2023;59:1494.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in RCA: 10]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
3.  Rusu MC, Tudose RC, Vrapciu AD, Popescu ŞA. Lowered hyoid bone overlapping the thyroid cartilage in CT angiograms. Surg Radiol Anat. 2024;46:333-339.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in RCA: 8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
4.  Dumitru CC, Vrapciu AD, Jianu AM, Hostiuc S, Rusu MC. The retromandibular loop of the external carotid artery. Ann Anat. 2024;253:152226.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in RCA: 10]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
5.  Triantafyllou G, Paschopoulos I, Duparc F, Tsakotos G, Tsiouris C, Olewnik Ł, Georgiev G, Zielinska N, Piagkou M.   The superior thyroid artery origin pattern: A systematic review with meta-analysis 2024 Preprint. Available from: bioRxiv: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-4557932/v1.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]
6.  Triantafyllou G, Vassiou K, Duparc F, Vlychou M, Paschopoulos I, Tsakotos G, Tudose RC, Rusu MC, Piagkou M. The lingual and facial arteries' common origin: a systematic review with meta-analysis and a computed tomography angiography study. Surg Radiol Anat. 2024;46:1937-1947.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in RCA: 6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
7.  Manta MD, Rusu MC, Hostiuc S, Tudose RC, Manta BA, Jianu AM. The vertical topography of the carotid bifurcation - original study and review. Surg Radiol Anat. 2024;46:1253-1263.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in RCA: 8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
8.  Standring S, Anand N, Birch R, Collins P, Crossman A, Gleeson M, Jawaheer G, Smith A, Spratt J, Stringer M, Tubbs S, Tunstall R, Wein A, Wigley C.   Gray's Anatomy: the anatomical basis of clinical practice. 41st ed. London: Elsevier, 2015.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
9.  Karangeli N, Triantafyllou G, Duparc F, Vassiou K, Vlychou M, Tsakotos G, Piagkou M. Retrostyloid and retromandibular courses of the external carotid artery. Surg Radiol Anat. 2024;47:23.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 4]  [Cited by in RCA: 4]  [Article Influence: 4.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
10.  Triantafyllou G, Botis G, Vassiou K, Vlychou M, Tsakotos G, Kalamatianos T, Matsopoulos G, Piagkou M. Τhe styloid process length and the stylohyoid chain ossification affect its relationship with the carotid arteries. Ann Anat. 2025;257:152342.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in RCA: 8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
11.  Triantafyllou G, Papadopoulos-Manolarakis P, Vassiou K, Vlychou M, Karangeli N, Papanagiotou P, Tsakotos G, Piagkou M. The impact of the styloid process angulation on the carotid arteries. Ann Anat. 2025;258:152378.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 1]  [Cited by in RCA: 3]  [Article Influence: 3.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
12.  Karangeli N, Triantafyllou G, Papadopoulos-Manolarakis P, Tsakotos G, Vassiou K, Vlychou M, Papanagiotou P, Piagkou M. The Anatomical Relationship Between the Hyoid Bone and the Carotid Arteries. Diagnostics (Basel). 2025;15:1485.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
13.  Suematsu T, Kawabata S, Nishikawa Y, Hirai N, Nakamura M, Terada E, Kajikawa R, Tsuzuki T. Mechanical compression of the carotid artery by the pharynx in the retropharyngeal space during swallowing and the induction of stenosis and embolic stroke: illustrative case. J Neurosurg Case Lessons. 2024;8:CASE2483.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
14.  Mutimer CA, Campbell BCV. Thromboembolism From Hyoid Bone-Related Direct Carotid Artery Compression. Stroke. 2024;55:e157-e158.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
15.  Bouille F, De Malherbe M, Pico F. Ischemic Stroke Due to Compression of a Wandering Internal Carotid Artery by the Hyoid Bone. JAMA Neurol. 2025;82:303-304.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
16.  Kho LK, Bates TR, Thompson A, Dharsono F, Prentice D. Cerebral embolism and carotid-hyoid impingement syndrome. J Clin Neurosci. 2019;64:27-29.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 3]  [Cited by in RCA: 5]  [Article Influence: 0.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
17.  Tokunaga K, Uehara T, Kanamaru H, Kataoka H, Saito K, Ishibashi-Ueda H, Shobatake R, Yamamoto Y, Toyoda K. Repetitive Artery-to-Artery Embolism Caused by Dynamic Movement of the Internal Carotid Artery and Mechanical Stimulation by the Hyoid Bone. Circulation. 2015;132:217-219.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 12]  [Cited by in RCA: 15]  [Article Influence: 1.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
18.  Abdelaziz OS, Ogilvy CS, Lev M. Is there a potential role for hyoid bone compression in pathogenesis of carotid artery stenosis? Surg Neurol. 1999;51:650-653.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 27]  [Cited by in RCA: 32]  [Article Influence: 1.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
19.  Mori M, Yamamoto H, Koga M, Okatsu H, Shono Y, Toyoda K, Fukuda K, Iihara K, Yamada N, Minematsu K. Hyoid bone compression-induced repetitive occlusion and recanalization of the internal carotid artery in a patient with ipsilateral brain and retinal ischemia. Arch Neurol. 2011;68:258-259.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 14]  [Cited by in RCA: 16]  [Article Influence: 1.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
20.  Renard D, Freitag C. Hyoid-related internal carotid artery dissection. J Neurol. 2012;259:2501-2502.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 10]  [Cited by in RCA: 17]  [Article Influence: 1.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
21.  Renard D, Rougier M, Aichoun I, Labauge P. Hyoid bone-related focal carotid vasculopathy. J Neurol. 2011;258:1540-1541.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 15]  [Cited by in RCA: 22]  [Article Influence: 1.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
22.  Hong JM, Kim TJ, Lee JS, Lee JS. Neurological picture. Repetitive internal carotid artery compression of the hyoid: a new mechanism of golfer's stroke? J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2011;82:233-234.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 19]  [Cited by in RCA: 24]  [Article Influence: 1.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
23.  Yukawa S, Yamamoto S, Hara H. Carotid artery dissection associated with an elongated hyoid bone. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2014;23:e411-e412.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 10]  [Cited by in RCA: 18]  [Article Influence: 1.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
24.  González Villaman CM, Domínguez Quiñónez R, Castillo Espinal L. Internal carotid artery dissection associated with an elongated hyoid bone in a patient with vascular Ehlers-Danlos syndrome. BMJ Case Rep. 2024;17:e260764.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
25.  Schneider CG, Kortmann H. Pseudoaneurysm of the common carotid artery due to ongoing trauma from the hyoid bone. J Vasc Surg. 2007;45:186-187.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 17]  [Cited by in RCA: 26]  [Article Influence: 1.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
26.  Liu S, Nezami N, Dardik A, Nassiri N. Hyoid bone impingement contributing to symptomatic atherosclerosis of the carotid bifurcation. J Vasc Surg Cases Innov Tech. 2020;6:89-92.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 6]  [Cited by in RCA: 12]  [Article Influence: 2.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
27.  Ye Q, Liu Y, Tang H, Zhou Q, Zhang H, Liu H. Hyoid bone compressioninduced carotid dissecting aneurysm: A case report. Exp Ther Med. 2023;26:551.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in RCA: 2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
28.  Kölbel T, Holst J, Lindh M, Mätzsch T. Carotid artery entrapment by the hyoid bone. J Vasc Surg. 2008;48:1022-1024.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 23]  [Cited by in RCA: 28]  [Article Influence: 1.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
29.  Martinelli O, Fresilli M, Jabbour J, Di Girolamo A, Irace L. Internal Carotid Stenosis Associated with Compression by Hyoid Bone. Ann Vasc Surg. 2019;58:379.e1-379.e3.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 6]  [Cited by in RCA: 12]  [Article Influence: 2.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
30.  Plotkin A, Bartley MG, Bowser KE, Yi JA, Magee GA. Carotid Artery Entrapment by the Hyoid Bone-A Rare Cause of Recurrent Strokes in a Young Patient. Ann Vasc Surg. 2019;57:48.e7-48.e11.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 5]  [Cited by in RCA: 8]  [Article Influence: 1.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
31.  Bicevska K, Skrastina S, Kupcs K, Raita A, Balodis A. Functional Compression of the Right Internal Carotid Artery by the Hyoid Bone in a Patient with Moyamoya Syndrome and Low Internal Carotid Artery Bifurcation: A Case Report. Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2025;21:383-389.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
32.  Keshelava G, Robakidze Z. Internal Carotid Artery Stenosis and Entrapment by the Hyoid Bone. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2024;68:422.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
33.  Keshelava G, Robakidze Z, Tsiklauri D. External Carotid Artery Entrapment by the Hyoid Bone Associated with an Atherosclerotic Stenosis of the Internal Carotid Artery. Diseases. 2024;12:258.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in RCA: 1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
34.  Bernardes MND, Cascudo NCM, El Cheikh MR, Gonçalves VF, Lamounier P, Ramos HVL, Costa CC. Aberrant common and internal carotid arteries and their surgical implications: a case report. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2021;87:366-369.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in RCA: 2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
35.  Baba A, Kurokawa R, Kayama R, Tsuneoka Y, Kurokawa M, Ota Y, Suzuki T, Yamauchi H, Matsushima S, Ojiri H. A rare case of positional changes of carotid artery depicted within a single MR study and a wandering carotid artery depicted on a serial MR studies. Radiol Case Rep. 2022;17:50-53.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in RCA: 1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]