BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Prospective Study
Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license. No commercial re-use. See permissions. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Radiol. Jun 28, 2026; 18(6): 120056
Published online Jun 28, 2026. doi: 10.4329/wjr.120056
Evaluation of bicuspid aortic valve-associated aortopathic changes using third-generation dual-source computed tomography
Salai Thanihaivel E, Arun Sharma, Mansi Verma, Rajesh Vijayvergiya, Manphool Singhal
Salai Thanihaivel E, Arun Sharma, Mansi Verma, Manphool Singhal, Department of Radiodiagnosis and Imaging, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh 160012, Chandīgarh, India
Rajesh Vijayvergiya, Department of Cardiology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh 160012, Chandīgarh, India
Co-corresponding authors: Arun Sharma and Manphool Singhal.
Author contributions: Thanihaivel E S and Sharma A conceptualized and designed the study and performed the research; Verma M contributed to data acquisition and analysis; Vijayvergiya R contributed to data analysis and interpretation; Singhal M supervised the study and provided critical revisions; Thanihaivel E S drafted the manuscript; Sharma A and Singhal M contribute equally to this study as co-corresponding authors; and all authors critically reviewed the manuscript and approved the final version.
AI contribution statement: The AI tool Grammarly was used for language editing (grammar, punctuation, and spelling) and polishing of the author’s text. All sections of the main text were written by the authors. No AI tool was used to draft any portion of the manuscript and response to reviewers. No AI tool was used for translation, data analysis, statistical computation, or content generation. All statistical analyses were performed in SPSS version 22 by the authors. No AI-generated images appear in the manuscript.
Institutional review board statement: The study was reviewed and approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee of the Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, (Approval No. IEC-INT/2022/MD-638).
Informed consent statement: Written informed consent was taken from the patients on prescribed formats, which were available in three languages - English, Hindi and the regional language (Punjabi) as per institutional protocol.
Conflict-of-interest statement: The authors declare no conflict of interest.
CONSORT 2010 statement: The authors have read the CONSORT 2010 Statement, and the manuscript was prepared and revised according to the CONSORT 2010 Statement.
Data sharing statement: No additional data are available.
Corresponding author: Arun Sharma, Department of Radiodiagnosis and Imaging, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Madhya Marg, Sector 12, Chandigarh 160012, Chandīgarh, India. drarungautam@gmail.com
Received: February 14, 2026
Revised: April 16, 2026
Accepted: May 25, 2026
Published online: June 28, 2026
Processing time: 131 Days and 15.3 Hours
Abstract
BACKGROUND

Bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) affects 0.5%-2% of the population and is associated with progressive aortopathy leading to life-threatening complications. Aortic size index (ASI) adjusts aortic dimensions for body surface area (BSA), potentially improving risk stratification.

AIM

To characterise BAV-associated aortopathic changes using third-generation dual-source computed tomography (CT) and to derive a cohort-specific ASI threshold associated with CT-defined ascending aortic dilatation in an Indian population.

METHODS

This prospective cross-sectional study enrolled 100 BAV patients (age > 18 years) from July 2022 to November 2023. All patients underwent CT aortography using 192-slice third-generation dual-source CT scanner (Somatom Force, Siemens). Aortic measurements were obtained at multiple levels including annulus, sinus of Valsalva, ascending aorta, arch, and descending thoracic aorta. ASI was calculated as maximum ascending aortic diameter divided by BSA. Statistical analysis included receiver operating characteristic curve analysis and correlation coefficients.

RESULTS

Mean age was 48.95 ± 13.78 years, with 64% males. Ascending aortic dilatation was present in 87% of patients, with a mean diameter of 42.79 ± 8.69 mm. Mean ASI was 25.13 ± 5.71 mm/m2 with 42% having ASI > 25 mm/m2 (high-risk category). ASI strongly correlated with ascending aortic diameter (rho = 0.87, P < 0.001). At ASI cutoff ≥ 23.8 mm/m2 sensitivity was 84% and specificity 90% for predicting aortic dilatation > 40 mm. The mean measurement difference between CT and echocardiography was 11.72 ± 8.27 mm.

CONCLUSION

In this single-centre cohort of Indian patients with BAVs, an ASI threshold of 23.8 mm/m2 was associated with CT-defined ascending aortic dilatation and may serve as a cohort-specific reference for risk stratification. Because ASI is mathematically derived from ascending aortic diameter, this finding should be interpreted as a cohort-specific threshold rather than independent validation of ASI as a predictor. Third-generation dual-source CT yielded larger absolute aortic measurements than transthoracic echocardiography; this difference is likely partly methodological, reflecting non-equivalent measurement sites, measurement conventions, and inherent limitations of 2D echocardiography in BAV.

Keywords: Bicuspid aortic valve; Aortic size index; Dual-source computed tomography; Aortopathy; Ascending aortic dilatation; Coarctation; Dissection

Core Tip: Bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) is a common congenital cardiac anomaly, frequently associated with aortopathy. Using third-generation dual-source computed tomography (CT) in 100 patients, we observed ascending aortic dilatation in 87% and identified a cohort-specific aortic size index threshold of 23.8 mm/m2 associated with CT-defined ascending aortic dilatation > 40 mm (sensitivity 84%, specificity 90%). Because aortic size index (ASI) is mathematically derived from the ascending aortic diameter, it is best interpreted as a cohort-specific threshold rather than as independent validation of ASI as a predictor. CT measurements were larger than transthoracic echocardiography (mean difference 11.72 mm), although this difference likely reflects differences in measurement sites, measurement conventions, and inherent limitations of 2D echocardiography in BAV rather than simple underestimation alone. These preliminary findings support further evaluation of indexed measurements alongside absolute diameter thresholds in populations with smaller body habitus, and will require validation in independent multicentre cohorts with longitudinal outcomes.

Write to the Help Desk