Published online May 28, 2025. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v17.i5.106333
Revised: April 9, 2025
Accepted: May 10, 2025
Published online: May 28, 2025
Processing time: 92 Days and 23.9 Hours
Chinese surgeons often rely on intraoperative exploration of the esophageal hiatus to determine the need for concurrent type I hiatal hernia (HH) repair during laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. However, no standardized criteria for the esophageal hiatus size or indications for exploration exist in China.
To investigate normal anatomical parameter ranges of the esophageal hiatus in patients with obesity.
A total of 158 patients, aged 20-49 years, was analyzed from January 2020 to June 2024. The patients were classified into the no reflux esophagitis (RE) no HH group (HHG), RE group, and type I HHG. The transverse and sagittal diameters and cross-sectional area of the esophageal hiatus were measured using multiplanar reconstruction of the computed tomography images.
Body mass index was positively correlated with area and transverse and sagittal diameters of the esophageal hiatus (r = 0.72, 0.69, and 0.54, respectively; P < 0.01). In the no RE no HHG and RE group, the esophageal hiatus size in the subgroup with obesity was greater than that in the non-obesity subgroup (area: 326.15 ± 78 mm2 vs 208.12 ± 64.44 mm2, transverse diameters: 15.97 ± 2.06 mm vs 13.37 ± 1.99 mm, sagittal diameters: 15.7 ± 2.08 mm vs 11.73 ± 2.08 mm; P < 0.01). Patients with obesity showed no significant differences in esophageal hiatus size with or without RE or HH.
The esophageal hiatus size increased with body mass index and was larger in patients with obesity than in those without obesity.
Core Tip: Given the lack of standardized criteria for esophageal hiatus size in patients with obesity, this retrospective case-control study found that esophageal hiatus size increased with body mass index and was larger in patients with obesity than without obesity. The esophageal hiatus area and transverse and sagittal diameters were 326.15 ± 78 mm2, 15.97 ± 2.06 mm, and 15.7 ± 2.08 mm, respectively. Patients with obesity with mild reflux esophagitis or type I hiatal hernia did not exhibit an enlarged esophageal hiatus. Thus, further computed tomography measurements of the esophageal hiatus could provide support for determining the need for intraoperative exploration.