©Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2026.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Feb 27, 2026; 18(2): 113867
Published online Feb 27, 2026. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v18.i2.113867
Published online Feb 27, 2026. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v18.i2.113867
Table 1 Summary of favorable features and complications of self-expanding metal stents used as a bridge to surgery
| Favorable features | Complications/unfavorable features |
| Timely relief of bowel obstruction | Perforation |
| Allows colonoscopy/imaging to rule out the possibility of synchronous tumors | Stent migration |
| Enables preoperative cancer staging | Chronic pain or tenesmus |
| Optimization before surgery: (1) Fluid and electrolyte correction; (2) Nutritional support; and (3) Bowel cleansing/preparation | Stent obstruction due to: (1) Tumor ingrowth; (2) Tumor overgrowth; and (3) Stool impaction |
| Relatively higher rates of primary anastomosis | Ulceration/bleeding |
| Reduced risk of permanent stoma | Infection at the stent site |
| Lower morbidity rates compared to emergency surgery; postoperative mortality rates comparable | Theoretical risk of tumor dissemination owing to tissue pressure exacerbation by stent-related shearing force |
Table 2 Contraindications and technical challenges associated with self-expanding metal stent insertion
| Absolute contraindications or major concerns | Relative contraindications and/or technical challenges |
| Perforation | Extracolonic obstruction |
| Colonic ischemia | Peritoneal metastases |
| Intra-abdominal abscess | Peritoneal fibrous adhesions |
| Peritonitis | Tumors located within 5 cm of the anal verge |
- Citation: Moyana TN. Emergency surgery for malignant large bowel obstruction: Assessing management options and outcomes. World J Gastrointest Surg 2026; 18(2): 113867
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v18/i2/113867.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v18.i2.113867
