Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastrointest Surg. May 27, 2025; 17(5): 103439
Published online May 27, 2025. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i5.103439
Table 1 Basic information of the study groups, mean ± SD/n (%)
Clinical data
Observation (n = 58)
Control (n = 58)
t/F value
P value
Age, years48.46 ± 4.7848.50 ± 4.660.6600.520
Sex
Male34 (58.62)35 (60.34)0.3920.696
Female24 (41.38)23 (39.66)
Tumor stage
I22 (37.93)21 (36.21)0.9560.419
II19 (32.76)20 (34.48)
III17 (29.31)17 (29.31)
Table 2 Perioperative indicators, mean ± SD
Variable
Observation (n = 58)
Control (n = 58)
t value
P value
Intraoperative bleeding, mL62.77 ± 4.5578.40 ± 4.4318.744< 0.001
Urinary tube line time, hour1.40 ± 0.331.79 ± 0.346.269< 0.001
Time to recovery of bowel function, hour2.11 ± 0.362.73 ± 0.418.654< 0.001
Dwelling time of drainage tube, hour5.54 ± 0.776.19 ± 0.684.819< 0.001
Table 3 Comparison of voiding disturbance risk between the 2 groups, n (%)
Variable
Observation (n = 58)
Control (n = 58)
χ2 value
P value
Urination disorder
Two weeks after surgery8 (13.79)17 (29.31)4.1300.042
Three months after surgery2 (3.45)8 (13.79)3.9400.047
Table 4 Comparison of male sexual function between the two groups, n (%)
Variable
Observation (n = 34)
Control (n = 35)
χ2 value
P value
Erectile dysfunction grade
I0 (0)0 (0)
II3 (8.82)6 (17.14)
III0 (0.00)4 (11.43)
Total3 (8.82)10 (28.57)4.3990.036
Table 5 Comparison of female sexual function between the 2 groups, n (%)
Variable
Observation (n = 24)
Control (n = 23)
χ2/Z
P value
Dyspareunia4.9050.027
Yes3 (8.33)8 (34.78)
No21 (91.67)15 (65.22)
Pleasure with sexual intercourse2.0220.043
Grade I20 (83.33)12 (52.17)
Grade II4 (16.67)7 (30.43)
Grade III0 (0.00)4 (17.39)