BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Retrospective Cohort Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Nov 27, 2025; 17(11): 110036
Published online Nov 27, 2025. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i11.110036
Table 1 Baseline patient demographics and disease characteristics, n (%)
Variable
Total (n = 546)
SPBSG (n = 228)
DBBSG (n = 318)
P value
Age, median (Q1, Q3)62.00 (51.00, 70.00)61.00 (51.00, 69.00)62.00 (51.00, 71.00)0.320
Sex0.875
Female290 (53.11)122 (53.51)168 (52.83)
Male256 (46.89)106 (46.49)150 (47.17)
BMI (kg/m²), median (Q1, Q3)21.56 (20.07, 23.23)21.83 (20.07, 23.23)21.30 (19.84, 23.23)0.501
TC, median (Q1, Q3)4.34 (3.65, 5.25)4.27 (3.58, 5.14)4.43 (3.71, 5.26)0.116
TG, median (Q1, Q3)1.19 (0.87, 1.72)1.16 (0.86, 1.63)1.20 (0.88, 1.87)0.222
Duodenal papilla length (cm), median (Q1, Q3)1.00 (0.78, 1.30)1.02 (0.80, 1.39)1.00 (0.76, 1.30)0.111
Length of EST incision (mm), median (Q1, Q3)3.00 (2.00, 3.58)2.40 (1.00, 3.00)3.00 (2.00, 4.00)< 0.001
Diameter of EPBD (mm), median (Q1, Q3)6.00 (6.00, 7.80)6.00 (6.00, 7.12)6.00 (6.00, 8.00)0.888
Time (week), median (Q1, Q3)11.00 (7.00, 14.00)12.00 (7.25, 14.00)11.00 (7.00, 14.00)0.010
EST< 0.001
No139 (25.46)78 (34.21)61 (19.18)
Yes407 (74.54)150 (65.79)257 (80.82)
EPBD0.162
No82 (15.02)40 (17.54)42 (13.21)
Yes464 (84.98)188 (82.46)276 (86.79)
Diameter of the stents< 0.001
5 Fr35 (6.41)35 (15.35)0 (0)
7 Fr193 (35.35)172 (75.44)21 (6.6)
8.5 Fr105 (19.23)19 (8.33)86 (27.04)
10 Fr213 (39.01)2 (0.88)211 (66.35)
Hyperlipidaemia0.070
No474 (86.81)205 (89.91)269 (84.59)
Yes72 (13.19)23 (10.09)49 (15.41)
DM0.100
No481 (88.10)207 (90.79)274 (86.16)
Yes65 (11.90)21 (9.21)44 (13.84)
CHD0.408
No504 (92.31)213 (93.42)291 (91.51)
Yes42 (7.69)15 (6.58)27 (8.49)
Fatty liver0.414
No486 (89.01)200 (87.72)286 (89.94)
Yes60 (10.99)28 (12.28)32 (10.06)
Gallstones< 0.001
No264 (48.35)139 (60.96)125 (39.31)
Yes282 (51.65)89 (39.04)193 (60.69)
Congenital choledochal cysts1.000
No544 (99.63)227 (99.56)317 (99.69)
Yes2 (0.37)1 (0.44)1 (0.31)
Extrahepatic bile duct stenosis0.059
No484 (88.64)209 (91.67)275 (86.48)
Yes62 (11.36)19 (8.33)43 (13.52)
History of pancreatitis0.327
No503 (92.12)207 (90.79)296 (93.08)
Yes43 (7.88)21 (9.21)22 (6.92)
History of ERCP0.983
No460 (84.25)192 (84.21)268 (84.28)
Yes86 (15.75)36 (15.79)50 (15.72)
History of cholecystectomy0.002
No359 (65.75)133 (58.33)226 (71.07)
Yes187 (34.25)95 (41.67)92 (28.93)
History of common bile duct exploration0.165
No527 (96.52)223 (97.81)304 (95.60)
Yes19 (3.48)5 (2.19)14 (4.40)
DP0.138
Simple or acute type301 (55.13)126 (55.26)175 (55.03)
Hyperplastic or sclerotic type118 (21.61)58 (25.44)60 (18.87)
Constrictive type41 (7.51)13 (5.70)28 (8.81)
Atrophic type86 (15.75)31 (13.60)55 (17.30)
PAD0.377
No384 (70.33)165 (72.37)219 (68.87)
Yes162 (29.67)63 (27.63)99 (31.13)
Location of DP to PAD0.406
Outside392 (71.79)168 (73.68)224 (70.44)
Inside154 (28.21)60 (26.32)94 (29.56)
SOD0.209
No477 (87.36)204 (89.47)273 (85.85)
Yes69 (12.64)24 (10.53)45 (14.15)
PBM0.152
No506 (92.67)207 (90.79)299 (94.03)
Yes40 (7.33)21 (9.21)19 (5.97)
PDS< 0.001
No256 (46.89)74 (32.46)182 (57.23)
Yes290 (53.11)154 (67.54)136 (42.77)
Metal-covered stents0.239
No534 (97.80)221 (96.93)313 (98.43)
Yes12 (2.20)7 (3.07)5 (1.57)
Table 2 Primary and secondary outcomes, n (%)
VariableTotal (n = 546)
SPBSG (n = 228)DBBSG (n = 318)P value
Chyme< 0.001
No450 (82.42)206 (90.35)244 (76.73)
Yes96 (17.58)22 (9.65)74 (23.27)
CBDS< 0.001
No362 (66.30)180 (78.95)182 (57.23)
Yes184 (33.70)48 (21.05)136 (42.77)
Acute cholangitis0.816
No521 (95.42)217 (95.18)304 (95.60)
Yes25 (4.58)11 (4.82)14 (4.40)
Stent displacement0.335
No524 (95.97)221 (96.93)303 (95.28)
Yes22 (4.03)7 (3.07)15 (4.72)
Table 3 Incidence of postoperative adverse events in both groups, n (%)
Variable
Total (n = 546)
SPBSG (n = 228)
DBBSG (n = 318)
P value
Post-ERCP acute cholangitis0.311
No532 (97.44)224 (98.25)308 (96.86)
Yes14 (2.56)4 (1.75)10 (3.14)
PEP0.418
No545 (99.82)227 (99.56)318 (100.00)
Yes1 (0.18)1 (0.44)0 (0.00)
Bleeding1.000
No544 (99.63)227 (99.56)317 (99.69)
Yes2 (0.37)1 (0.44)1 (0.31)
Duodenal perforation
No546 (100)228 (100)318 (100)NA
Yes0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)
Table 4 Hazard ratios and 95% confidence interval of chyme reflux into the bile duct according to types of biliary stents
GroupModel 1
Model 2
Model 3
HR (95%CI)
P value
HR (95%CI)
P value
HR (95%CI)
P value
01.00 (reference)-1.00 (reference)-1.00 (reference)-
12.643 (1.641-4.255)< 0.0012.868 (1.774-4.637)< 0.0012.793 (1.695-4.603)< 0.001
Table 5 Hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals of common bile duct stones according to types of biliary stents
GroupModel 1
Model 2
Model 3
HR (95%CI)
P value
HR (95%CI)
P value
HR (95%CI)
P value
01.00 (reference)-1.00 (reference)-1.00 (reference)-
12.275 (1.632-3.172)< 0.0012.319 (1.659-3.242)< 0.0012.475 (1.732-3.536)< 0.001