BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Retrospective Cohort Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Oct 27, 2025; 17(10): 109729
Published online Oct 27, 2025. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i10.109729
Table 1 Comparison of general data between the two groups, mean ± SD/n (%)
GroupnSex
Age (years)Tumor location
Tumor staging
Histological classification
Male
Female
Mid-thoracic
Upper thoracic
Stage I
Stage IIa
Squamous carcinoma
Adenocarcinoma
Others
Observation group6637 (56.06)29 (43.94)62.33 ± 5.7842 (63.64)24 (36.36)35 (53.03)31 (46.97)17 (25.76)25 (37.88)24 (36.36)
Control group6133 (54.10)28 (45.90)61.54 ± 6.4036 (59.02)25 (40.98)39 (63.93)22 (36.07)15 (24.59)30 (49.18)16 (26.23)
χ2/t0.0490.7100.2861.5501.956
P value0.8240.4790.5930.2130.371
Table 2 Comparison of surgical indicators between the two groups, mean ± SD
Group
n
Surgical duration (minutes)
Intraoperative blood loss (mL)
Chest drainage volume (mL)
Number of dissected lymph nodes
Observation group66165.48 ± 20.4489.08 ± 10.23256.34 ± 31.618.44 ± 0.75
Control group61194.63 ± 22.78123.62 ± 15.28310.29 ± 35.726.23 ± 0.61
t7.60015.0729.02818.129
P value< 0.001< 0.001< 0.001< 0.001
Table 3 Comparison of pain mediator levels between the two groups, mean ± SD
Groupn5-HT (nmol/L)
K+ (nmol/L)
NE (ng/L)
Preoperatively
Postoperatively
Preoperatively
Postoperatively
Preoperatively
Postoperatively
Observation group660.22 ± 0.040.41 ± 0.04a28.35 ± 2.4033.69 ± 2.58a1.25 ± 0.113.03 ± 0.48a
Control group610.21 ± 0.030.69 ± 0.05a27.94 ± 2.3338.86 ± 3.71a1.27 ± 0.165.78 ± 0.52a
t1.58434.9730.9759.1740.82630.992
P value0.114< 0.0010.331< 0.0010.410< 0.001
Table 4 Comparison of immune response between the two groups, mean ± SD
GroupnCD4+ (%)
CD8+ (%)
CD4+/CD8+
Preoperatively
Postoperatively
Preoperatively
Postoperatively
Preoperatively
Postoperatively
Observation group6636.85 ± 2.4531.73 ± 2.12a26.76 ± 2.8529.46 ± 3.55a1.37 ± 0.121.07 ± 0.10a
Control group6137.41 ± 3.0327.49 ± 2.98a27.01 ± 2.6433.95 ± 3.96a1.39 ± 0.180.81 ± 0.07a
t1.1499.2930.5126.7370.74216.845
P value0.253< 0.0010.610< 0.0010.460< 0.001
Table 5 Comparison of inflammatory markers between the two groups, mean ± SD, ng/L
GroupnIL-6
IL-8
TNF-α
Preoperatively
Postoperatively
Preoperatively
Postoperatively
Preoperatively
Postoperatively
Observation group66192.64 ± 18.33268.75 ± 25.48a168.33 ± 17.68221.43 ± 20.38a102.49 ± 11.71132.05 ± 15.43a
Control group61189.45 ± 20.41295.03 ± 31.62a165.26 ± 15.45271.69 ± 25.74a98.74 ± 10.65178.63 ± 16.65a
t0.9285.1751.03912.2461.88316.364
P value0.355< 0.0010.301< 0.0010.062< 0.001
Table 6 Comparison of pulmonary function parameters between the two groups, mean ± SD, mL
GroupnFVC
FEV1
MVV
Preoperatively
Postoperatively
Preoperatively
Postoperatively
Preoperatively
Postoperatively
Observation group6695.45 ± 8.4678.28 ± 7.75a89.49 ± 9.1176.68 ± 6.41a86.68 ± 9.2168.49 ± 7.11a
Control group6196.02 ± 10.2162.43 ± 5.33a88.32 ± 8.4666.50 ± 5.78a85.12 ± 8.7856.37 ± 6.44a
t0.34413.3230.7489.3720.97510.040
P value0.732< 0.0010.456< 0.0010.331< 0.001
Table 7 Comparison of complication rates between the two groups, n (%)
Group
n
Intraoperative iatrogenic injuries
Chylothorax
Anastomotic fistula
Massive hemorrhage
Pleural effusion
Infections in the lungs and other systems
Overall incidence
Observation group660 (0)2 (3.03)1 (1.52)0 (0)2 (3.03)1 (1.52)6 (7.58)
Control group612 (3.28)2 (3.28)4 (6.56)2 (3.28)1 (1.64)2 (3.28)13 (21.31)
χ24.917
P value0.027