BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Retrospective Study
Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Apr 27, 2026; 18(4): 116371
Published online Apr 27, 2026. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v18.i4.116371
Figure 1
Figure 1 Characteristics of extraluminal-growing gastric tumors originating from the muscularis propria layer. A: Long-axis diameter size; B: Location; C: Pathological types; D: National Institutes of Health risk category of gastrointestinal stromal tumor. EFR: Endoscopic full-thickness resection; STER: Submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection.
Figure 2
Figure 2 Comparative analysis of postoperative laboratory tests. A: Change in hemoglobin levels from preoperative values; B: Postoperative white blood cell level; C: Postoperative neutrophil level; D: Postoperative C-reactive protein level; E: Change in alanine aminotransferase levels from preoperative values; F: Change in aspartate aminotransferase levels from preoperative values. EFR: Endoscopic full-thickness resection; STER: Submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection.
Figure 3
Figure 3 Comparative analysis of surgical and health economics indicators for extraluminal-growing gastric tumors originating from the muscularis propria layer at different locations. A: Operative time; B: Blood loss; C: Hospital stay; D: Surgical cost.
Figure 4
Figure 4 Comparative analysis of postoperative medical management for extraluminal-growing gastric tumors originating from the muscularis propria layer at different locations. A: Duration of nasogastric tube placement; B: Duration of proton pump inhibitor use; C: Duration of antimicrobial therapy; D: Time to resume oral intake.
Figure 5
Figure 5 Optimization of surgical approach selection for extraluminal-growing gastric tumors originating from the muscularis propria at different locations.