BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Retrospective Cohort Study
©Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2026. No commercial re-use. See Permissions. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Feb 27, 2026; 18(2): 115427
Published online Feb 27, 2026. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v18.i2.115427
Risk factor analysis and nomogram model construction for mortality in patients following colonic perforation surgery
Xiu-Juan Xu, Hou-Dao Zhang, Chu-Ji Cheng, Ya-Ming Zhang, Qi Zhang
Xiu-Juan Xu, Chu-Ji Cheng, Department of Critical Medicine, Anqing Municipal Hospital, Anqing 246000, Anhui Province, China
Hou-Dao Zhang, Ya-Ming Zhang, Qi Zhang, Department of General Surgery, Anqing Municipal Hospital, Anqing 246000, Anhui Province, China
Co-corresponding authors: Ya-Ming Zhang and Qi Zhang.
Author contributions: Xu XJ, Zhang Q and Cheng CJ wrote the main manuscript text; Zhang HD prepared table; Zhang Q and Zhang YM revised the manuscript. All authors reviewed the manuscript. Zhang Q provided the essential clinical and methodological framework for risk prediction in critically ill surgical patients, overseeing data analysis and model validation. Zhang YM contributed the vital surgical perspective, ensuring the clinical relevance and applicability of the predictive model and the proposed management pathway. Their dual leadership was indispensable for bridging the gap between intensive care prognostication and surgical decision-making-the core interdisciplinary focus of this work. Assigning co-correspondence accurately represents this collaborative partnership, ensures that readers and the scientific community can directly access expertise from both critical care and surgical domains, and aligns with accepted authorship guidelines recognizing shared senior contribution.
Institutional review board statement: This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Anqing Municipal Hospital under ethical approval number Medical Ethics Review (2025) No. 173.
Informed consent statement: Informed consent was obtained from all participating patients.
Conflict-of-interest statement: The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
STROBE statement: The authors have read the STROBE Statement-checklist of items, and the manuscript was prepared and revised according to the STROBE Statement-checklist of items.
Data sharing statement: Data is provided within the manuscript or Supplementary material.
Corresponding author: Qi Zhang, MD, Professor, Researcher, Department of General Surgery, Anqing Municipal Hospital, No. 352 Renmin Road, Anqing 246000, Anhui Province, China. drzhangqi1987@163.com
Received: October 20, 2025
Revised: December 5, 2025
Accepted: January 6, 2026
Published online: February 27, 2026
Processing time: 133 Days and 6.5 Hours
Abstract
BACKGROUND

Colonic perforation is a surgical emergency with high mortality due to rapid progression to septic shock. Early identification of high-risk patients is critical for improving outcomes, yet existing predictive tools are often complex and lack clinical practicality.

AIM

To identify the risk factors for postoperative mortality in patients with colonic perforation and develop and validate a predictive model.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients who underwent surgery for colonic perforation at the Department of Critical Medicine and General Surgery, Anqing Municipal Hospital, between January 2020 and July 2025. Patients were selected on the basis of inclusion and exclusion criteria and were classified into two groups according to postoperative outcomes: Death and survival. General demographics, laboratory results, and imaging data were collected and compared between the two groups. Univariate analysis was performed initially, followed by multivariate logistic regression analysis for variables with significant differences in the univariate analysis. A predictive model for postoperative mortality was constructed on the basis of the multivariate results. Internal validation was conducted using the bootstrap resampling method. The clinical optimal threshold was identified through decision curve analysis (DCA), and the operability of the dual cut-off strategy was demonstrated using a full-sample confusion matrix and a funnel-type pathway diagram. A nomogram was developed as a personalized prediction tool.

RESULTS

A total of 134 patients were included in the study, with 21 patients in the postoperative death group and 113 in the survival group, yielding a mortality rate of 15.6%. Moreover, no significant differences were found between the two groups concerning sex, history of hypertension, diabetes, cerebrovascular sequelae, cardiac history, haemoglobin level, albumin concentration, intraperitoneal free gas presence, intraperitoneal free fluid presence, perforation site, cause of perforation, operation time, or intraoperative blood loss volume. However, significant differences in age; American Society of Anaesthesiologists classification; Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) score; preoperative peripheral blood white blood cell (WBC) count; platelet count; serum total bilirubin level; serum creatinine level; lactate level; C-reactive protein level; procalcitonin level; the presence of portal venous gas (PVG); and time from onset to surgery (whether > 24 hours) were detected (all P < 0.05). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that the APACHE II score [odds ratio (OR) = 1.24, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.03-1.48], lactate level (OR = 2.40, 95%CI: 1.34-4.31), and presence of PVG (OR = 20.32, 95%CI: 1.89-218.45) were risk factors for postoperative mortality, whereas an elevated WBC count (OR = 0.68, 95%CI: 0.55-0.85) served as a protective factor. The constructed receiver operating characteristic curve revealed an area under the curve of 0.852 (95%CI: 0.791-0.913), with a Brier score = 0.072 and a slope ≈ 1. DCA demonstrated that within the 1%-40% threshold interval, the net benefit of the three model cut-off points surpassed those of the “full intervention” and “no intervention” scenarios. The full-sample pathway validation showed that the funnel-type process achieved 95.2% sensitivity for mortality screening with a 53% relative reduction in intensive care unit admissions.

CONCLUSION

The predictive model for postoperative mortality in patients with colonic perforation, which is based on four indicators (APACHE II score, lactate level, WBC count, and PVG presence), demonstrates strong predictive performance. The dual cut-off pathway (0.020 high-sensitivity screen + 0.121 resource-efficient confirmation) markedly reduced intensive care unit resource use while maintaining high sensitivity (95.2%). This investigation offers a replicable decision-making tool that can be integrated into information systems for future prospective studies.

Keywords: Colonic perforation; Mortality; Nomogram; Risk factors; Septic shock

Core Tip: A nomogram model incorporating the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score, lactate level, white blood cell count, and presence of portal venous gas was developed and internally validated to predict mortality after colonic perforation surgery (area under the curve = 0.852). The dual-threshold “0.020 high-sensitivity screen + 0.121 resource-efficient confirmation” funnel strategy reduced the need for high-level intervention by 53% in this cohort while maintaining high sensitivity (95.2%). This visual tool offers a practical, system-compatible decision aid for early risk stratification and intensive care unit resource optimization, although external validation in multicentre, prospective studies is needed before clinical implementation.