Copyright
©2011 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastrointest Oncol. Oct 15, 2011; 3(10): 137-143
Published online Oct 15, 2011. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v3.i10.137
Published online Oct 15, 2011. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v3.i10.137
Table 1 Summary of reports on robotic surgery for gastric tumors
Ref. | Yr | Country | Study design | Patients | Surgery | Sample |
Hashizume et al[26] | 2003 | Japan | Review | Robot | ||
Anderson et al[27] | 2007 | USA | Case series | Gastric adenocarcinoma only | Robot | 7 |
Hyung et al[28] | 2007 | South Korea | Review, Nonrandomized comparative | Gastric adenocarcinoma only | Initial Robot | 10 |
Initial Lap. | 10 | |||||
Recent Lap. | 10 | |||||
Patriti et al[29] | 2008 | Italy | Case series | Gastric adenocarcinoma only | Robot | 13 |
Pugliese et al[30] | 2009 | Italy | Nonrandomized comparative | Gastric adenocarcinoma only | Robot | 9 |
Lap. | 46 | |||||
Song et al[31] | 2009 | South Korea | Nonrandomized comparative | Gastric adenocarcinoma only | Initial Robot | 20 |
Initial Lap. | 20 | |||||
Recent Lap. | 20 | |||||
Song et al[32] | 2009 | South Korea | Case series | Gastric adenocarcinoma only | Robot | 100 |
Hur et al[33] | 2010 | South Korea | Case series | Gastric adenocarcinoma only | Robot | 7 |
Pugliese et al[34] | 2010 | Italy | Nonrandomized comparative | Gastric adenocarcinoma only | Robot | 16 |
Lap. | 48 | |||||
Kim et al[35] | 2010 | South Korea | Nonrandomized comparative | Gastric adenocarcinoma only | Robot | 16 |
Lap. | 11 | |||||
Open | 12 | |||||
Ryu et al[36] | 2010 | South Korea | Case series | Gastric adenocarcinoma and gastric SMT | Robot | 2 |
Lap. | 19 | |||||
Buchs et al[37] | 2010 | Swizerland | Case series | Gastric SMT only | Robot | 5 |
Table 2 Patients’ characteristics and operative outcomes
Ref. | Surgery | Sample | Sex (M:F) | Mean age (yr) | Mean BMI (kg/m2) | Operation time (min) | Blood loss (mL) | Conversion (%) |
Anderson et al[27]1 | Robot | 7 | 4:3 | 64 (53-80) | 25.8 (19.3-29.3) | 420 (390-480) | 300 (100-900) | 0 |
Hyung et al[28] | Initial Robot | 10 | 6:4 | 54 (35-73) | 23.4 (20.8-26.7) | 253 (200-316) | - | 0 |
Initial Lap. | 10 | 8:2 | 55 | 23.9 (16.9-29.6) | 337 (285-450) | - | 0 | |
Recent Lap. | 10 | 7:3 | 56 | 23.1 (19.5-26.1) | 164 (120-200) | - | 0 | |
Patriti et al[29] | Robot | 13 | 1:1 | 68.4 ± 11.9 | 26.13 ± 4.73 | 286.0 ± 32.6 | 103.0 ± 87.5 | - |
Pugliese et al[30] | Robot | 9 | - | - | - | 350 ± 71 (240-460) | 92 ± 58 (50-200) | - |
Lap. | 46 | - | - | - | 236 ± 20 (145-360) | 156 ± 57 (45-250) | - | |
Song et al[31] | Initial Robot | 20 | 8:12 | 51.6 ± 12.5 | 23.4 ± 2.1 | 230.0 ± 34.9a | 94.8 ± 121.5 | 0 |
Initial Lap. | 20 | 14:6 | 62.5 ± 12.9 | 23.6 ± 3.6 | 289.5 ± 59.3 | - | 0 | |
Recent Lap. | 20 | 13:7 | 55.0 ± 5.8 | 22.4 ± 2.1 | 134.0 ± 40.0 | 39.5 ± 27.7 | 0 | |
Song et al[32] | Robot | 100 | 54:46 | 55.4 ± 13.0 (25-89) | 23.3 ± 2.74 (17.0-30.1) | 231.3 ± 43.2 (155-330) | 128.2 ± 217.5 (12-1400) | 0 |
Hur et al[33] | Robot | 7 | 4:3 | 62 (35-72) | - | 205 (190-240) | - | - |
Pugliese et al[34] | Robot | 16 | - | - | - | 344 ± 62 (240-460) | 90 ± 48 (50-200) | 12 |
Lap. | 48 | - | - | - | 235 ± 23 (145-360) | 148 ± 53 (45-250) | 6 | |
Kim et al[35] | Robot | 16 | 10:6 | 53.8 ± 15.6 | 21.3 ± 3.4a | 259.2 ± 38.9a | 30.3 ± 15.1a | - |
Lap. | 11 | 10:1 | 57.9 ± 13.1 | 25.3 ± 2.5 | 203.9 ± 36.4 | 44.7 ± 37.1 | - | |
Open | 12 | 9:3 | 56.0 ± 12.4 | 25.2 ± 1.9 | 126.7 ± 24.1 | 78.8 ± 74.1 | - |
Table 3 Postoperative courses
Ref. | Surgery | Sample | Oral feeding (d) | First flatus time (d) | Postoperative hospital stay (d) | Total complication (%) |
Anderson et al[27]1 | Robot | 7 | 4 (2-8) | - | 4 (3-9) | 14.3 |
Hyung et al[28] | Initial Robot | 10 | 4 | 2.9 | 6.0 (5-10) | - |
Initial Lap. | 10 | 4.8 | 3.1 | 6.9 (5-8) | - | |
Recent Lap. | 10 | 4.3 | 3.3 | 6 (5-8) | - | |
Patriti et al[29] | Robot | 13 | - | - | 11.2 ± 4.3 | 46.2 |
Pugliese et al[30] | Robot | 9 | 5 ± 1.1 | - | 11 ± 1 (10-13) | - |
Lap. | 46 | 5 ± 0.8 | - | 10 ± 2.5 (7-24) | - | |
Song et al[31] | Initial Robot | 20 | 4 ± 0 | 3 ± 0.40 | 5.7 ± 1.0 | 5 |
Initial Lap. | 20 | 4.95 ± 1.47 | 3 ± 0.40 | 7.7 ± 3.5 | 5 | |
Recent Lap. | 20 | 4.1 ± 0.45 | 3.25 ± 0.58 | 6.2 ± 3.1 | 10 | |
Song et al[32] | Robot | 100 | 4.2 ± 1.2 (3-15) | 2.9 ± 0.5 (1-4) | 7.8 ± 17.1 (5-175) | 14 |
Pugliese et al[34] | Robot | 16 | 4.8 ± 1.3 | - | 10 ± 3 (10-13) | 12 |
Lap. | 48 | 5 ± 0.8 | - | 10 ± 2.6 (7-24) | 14.5 | |
Kim et al[35] | Robot | 16 | - | 3.2 ± 1.1 | 5.1 ± 0.3a | - |
Lap. | 11 | - | 3.6 ± 0.9 | 6.5 ± 0.8 | - | |
Open | 12 | - | 3.4 ± 0.9 | 6.7 ± 1.4 | - |
Table 4 Pathologic outcomes
Ref. | Patients | Surgery | Sample | LN dissection (D1+αorβ/D2) | LN harvested (number) | Stage (Ia/Ib/II) |
Anderson et al[27]1 | Gastric adenocarcinoma only | Robot | 7 | - | 24 (17-30) | 2/2/2 |
Hyung et al[28] | Gastric adenocarcinoma only | Initial Robot | 10 | - | 34 (16-50) | - |
Initial Lap. | 10 | - | 29.2 (12-54) | - | ||
Recent Lap. | 10 | - | 37.8 (26-51) | - | ||
Patriti et al[29] | Gastric adenocarcinoma only | Robot | 13 | - | 28.1 ± 8.3 | 3/3/6 |
Pugliese et al[30] | Gastric adenocarcinoma only | Robot | 9 | - | 27.5 ± 5 (18-40) | - |
Lap. | 46 | - | 31.5 ± 9.5 (20-45) | - | ||
Song et al[31] | Gastric adenocarcinoma only | Initial Robot | 20 | 16/4 | 35.3 ± 10.5 | 19/1/10 |
Initial Lap. | 20 | 10/10 | 31.5 ± 17.1 | 14/4/2 | ||
Recent Lap. | 20 | 12/8 | 42.7 ± 14.9 | 19/0/1 | ||
Song et al[32] | Gastric adenocarcinoma only | Robot | 100 | 58/42 | 36.7 ± 13.3 (11-83) | 74/16/4 |
Hur et al[33] | Gastric adenocarcinoma only | Robot | 7 | - | - | - |
Pugliese et al[34] | Gastric adenocarcinoma only | Robot | 16 | - | 25 ± 4.5 (18-40) | - |
Lap. | 48 | - | 31 ± 8 (20-45) | - | ||
Kim et al[35] | Gastric adenocarcinoma only | Robot | 16 | 2/14 | 41.1 ± 10.9 | - |
Lap. | 11 | 3/8 | 37.4 ± 10.0 | - | ||
Open | 12 | 0/12 | 43.3 ± 10.4 | - |
- Citation: Baek SJ, Lee DW, Park SS, Kim SH. Current status of robot-assisted gastric surgery. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2011; 3(10): 137-143
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5204/full/v3/i10/137.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4251/wjgo.v3.i10.137