Editorial
Copyright ©2011 Baishideng Publishing Group Co., Limited. All rights reserved.
World J Gastrointest Oncol. Oct 15, 2011; 3(10): 137-143
Published online Oct 15, 2011. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v3.i10.137
Current status of robot-assisted gastric surgery
Se-Jin Baek, Dong-Woo Lee, Sung-Soo Park, Seon-Hahn Kim
Se-Jin Baek, Dong-Woo Lee, Department of Surgery, Korea University College of Medicine, MIS and Robotic Surgery Center, Korea University Medical Center, Korea University Anam Hospital, Seoul 136-705, South Korea
Sung-Soo Park, Division of Upper GI Surgery, Department of Surgery, Korea University College of Medicine, MIS and Robotic Surgery Center, Korea University Medical Center, Korea University Anam Hospital, Seoul 136-705, South Korea
Seon-Hahn Kim, Division of Colorectal, Department of Surgery, Korea University College of Medicine, MIS and Robotic Surgery Center, Korea University Medical Center, Korea University Anam Hospital, Seoul 136-705, South Korea
Author contributions: Baek SJ and Park SS mainly contributed to this paper; Lee DW edited the data; Kim SH reviewed generally.
Supported by A grant from the National R&D Program for Cancer Control, Ministry of Health and Welfare, Republic of Korea (1020410)
Correspondence to: Sung-Soo Park, MD, PhD, Division of Upper GI Surgery, Department of Surgery, Korea University College of Medicine, MIS and Robotic Surgery Center, Korea University Medical Center, Korea University Anam Hospital, Anam-dong 5-ga Seongbuk-gu, Seoul 136-705, South Korea. kugspss@korea.ac.kr
Telephone: +82-2-9206772 Fax: +82-2-9281631
Received: November 23, 2010
Revised: October 4, 2011
Accepted: October 10, 2011
Published online: October 15, 2011
Abstract

In an effort to minimize the limitations of laparoscopy, a robotic surgery system was introduced, but its role for gastric cancer is still unclear. The objective of this article is to assess the current status of robotic surgery for gastric cancer and to predict future prospects. Although the current study was limited by its small number of patients and retrospective nature, robot-assisted gastrectomy with lymphadenectomy for the treatment of gastric cancer is a feasible and safe procedure for experienced laparoscopic surgeons. Most studies have reported satisfactory results for postoperative short-term coutcomes, such as: postoperative oral feeding, gas out, hospital stay and complications, compared with laparoscopic surgery; the difference is a longer operation time. However, robotic surgery showed a shallow learning curve compared with the familarity of conventional open surgery; after the accumulation of several cases, robotic surgery could be expected to result in a similar operation time. Robotic-assisted gastrectomy can expand the indications of minimally invasive surgery to include advanced gastric cancer by improving the ability to perform lymphadenectomy. Moreover, ”total” robotic gastrectomy can be facilitated using a robot-sewing technique and gastric submucosal tumors near the gastroesophageal junction or pylorus can be resected safely by this novel technique. In conclusion, robot-assisted gastrectomy may offer a good alternative to conventional open or laparoscopic surgery for gastric cancer, provided that long-term oncologic outcomes can be confirmed.

Keywords: Robot surgery; Stomach; Minimally invasive surgery