Effect of the Internet+ 5A nursing model on patients with middle- and late-stage digestive tract tumors pain

Table 1 Comparison of general data between the two groups

Group	n	Age (years)	Male	Female
Control group	50	65.23 ± 3.15	28	22
Observation group	50	65.18 ± 3.21	30	20
t/χ² value	-	0.079	0.164	0.164
P value	-	0.938	0.685	0.685

Table 2 Comparison of Numerical Rating Scale scores between the two groups (mean ± SD)

Group	n	NRS
		Before nursing	After nursing
Control group	50	2.23 ± 0.23	1.45 ± 0.25a
Observation group	50	2.20 ± 0.22	0.18 ± 0.04a
t value	-	0.667	38.470
P value	-	0.507	< 0.01

^aP < 0.05 vs before nursing.

NRS: Numerical Rating Scale.

Table 3 Comparison of European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 scores between the two groups (mean ± SD)

Group	n	Cognitive function		Role function		Emotional function		Physical function		Social function
		Before nursing	After nursing	Before nursing	After nursing	Before nursing	After nursing	Before nursing	After nursing	Before nursing	After nursing
Control group	50	85.23 ± 6.12	91.56 ± 4.34a	82.12 ± 4.23	89.56 ± 4.18a	68.56 ± 4.89	75.12 ± 6.65a	88.56 ± 6.23	92.34 ± 2.89a	82.85 ± 0.56	89.34 ± 4.45a
Observation group	50	85.56 ± 6.08	95.89 ± 1.67a	82.34 ± 4.18	94.87 ± 3.56a	68.78 ± 4.92	81.45 ± 9.21a	88.78 ± 6.18	97.12 ± 1.45a	82.92 ± 0.62	93.12 ± 3.32a
t value	-	0.27	6.584	0.262	6.839	0.224	3.94	0.177	10.453	0.592	4.814
P value	-	0.787	< 0.01	0.794	< 0.01	0.823	< 0.01	0.86	< 0.01	0.555	< 0.01

^aP < 0.05 vs before nursing.

Table 4 Comparison of Chinese Version of the Self-Management Efficacy Scale for Cancer Patients scores between the two groups (mean ± SD)

Group	n	Self-stress reduction		Positive attitude		Self-decision-making
		Before nursing	After nursing	Before nursing	After nursing	Before nursing	After nursing
Control group	50	37.34 ± 3.12	42.56 ± 4.89a	47.65 ± 3.23	62.12 ± 3.89a	7.77 ± 1.23	9.12 ± 1.89a
Observation group	50	37.56 ± 3.08	46.23 ± 2.45a	47.45 ± 3.18	68.01 ± 4.21a	7.89 ± 1.18	12.34 ± 1.23a
t value	-	0.355	4.745	0.312	7.266	0.498	10.097
P value	-	0.724	< 0.01	0.756	< 0.01	0.620	< 0.01

^aP < 0.05 vs before nursing.

Table 5 Comparison of Chinese Version of the American Pain Society Patient Outcome Questionnaire scores between the two groups (mean ± SD)

Group	n	Pain intensity		Activity interference		Sleep interference		Emotion		Adverse reactions related to pain treatment drugs		Perception of pain management
		Before nursing	After nursing	Before nursing	After nursing	Before nursing	After nursing	Before nursing	After nursing	Before nursing	After nursing	Before nursing	After nursing
Control group	50	2.23 ± 0.23	1.45 ± 0.25a	7.67 ± 1.23	3.92 ± 0.89a	8.56 ± 2.23	4.12 ± 1.05a	7.23 ± 1.04	3.95 ± 1.05a	7.64 ± 0.23	2.97 ± 1.56a	3.56 ± 0.23	6.12 ± 1.85a
Observation group	50	2.20 ± 0.22	0.18 ± 0.04a	7.92 ± 1.08	2.12 ± 0.56a	8.78 ± 2.18	2.34 ± 0.29a	7.25 ± 1.03	2.08 ± 0.28a	7.67 ± 0.18	1.21 ± 0.09a	3.60 ± 0.18	8.45 ± 1.06a
t value	-	0.667	38.47	1.08	12.104	0.499	11.555	0.097	12.168	0.726	6.539	0.968	7.727
P value	-	0.507	< 0.01	0.283	< 0.01	0.619	< 0.01	0.923	< 0.01	0.469	< 0.01	0.335	< 0.01

^aP < 0.05 vs before nursing.