Exploring the improvement effect of intestinal network monitoring system on intestinal preparation quality of colonoscopy

Table 1 General data comparison, n (%)

Group	Age (year), mean ± SD	Sex			BMI (kg/m2)	Years of education (years)
		Male		Female
Control group (n = 400)	44.26 ± 5.98	216 (54.00)		184 (46.00)	22.36 ± 2.68	9.66 ± 2.16
Test group (n = 400)	44.31 ± 6.99	222 (55.50)		178 (44.50)	22.16 ± 2.57	9.89 ± 3.64
χ2/t	-0.109	0.182			1.086	-1.087
P value	0.913	0.670			0.278	0.277
Group	The colonoscopy time			Type of colonoscopy		The history of colonoscopy
	Forenoon		Afternoon	Common	Analgesia	Yes	No
Control group (n = 400)	312 (78.00)		88 (22.00)	308 (77.00)	92 (23.00)	198 (49.50)	202 (50.50)
Test group (n = 400)	333 (83.25)		67 (16.75)	326 (81.50)	74 (18.50)	182 (45.50)	218 (54.50)
χ2	3.529			2.463		1.283
P value	0.060			0.117		0.257

BMI: Body mass index.

Table 2 Comparison of physiological and psychological stress indicators before and after the intervention, mean ± SD

Group	SAS (score)		SDS (score)
	Before the intervention	After the intervention	Before the intervention	After the intervention
Control group (n = 400)	54.22 ± 7.15	48.55 ± 7.12a	55.41 ± 6.98	51.01 ± 4.21a
Test group (n = 400)	54.65 ± 9.16	42.13 ± 6.17a	54.98 ± 6.13	43.11 ± 3.54a
t	-0.740	13.629	0.926	28.725
P value	0.459	< 0.001	0.355	< 0.001
Group	HR (score)		SBP (mmHg)
	Before the intervention	After the intervention	Before the intervention	After the intervention
Control group (n = 400)	78.01 ± 6.41	91.22 ± 4.23a	112.25 ± 6.16	133.21 ± 4.13a
Test group (n = 400)	78.77 ± 6.89	85.16 ± 3.96a	112.67 ± 5.13	124.52 ± 3.69a
t	-1.566	20.917	-1.048	31.381
P value	0.118	< 0.001	0.295	< 0.001

^aP < 0.05 for comparison with the same group before intervention.

HR: Hazard ratio; SAS: Self-Rating Anxiety Scale; SDS: Self-Rating Depression Scale; SBP: Systolic blood pressure.

Table 3 Comparison of the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale scores, mean ± SD

Group	Left hemicolon (score)	Right hemicolon (score)	Colon transversum (score)	Total score
Control group (n = 400)	2.12 ± 0.56	2.32 ± 0.16	2.24 ± 0.23	6.68 ± 1.56
Test group (n = 400)	1.56 ± 0.31	1.66 ± 0.23	1.74 ± 0.29	5.96 ± 1.61
t	17.498	47.113	27.017	6.245
P value	< 0.001	< 0.001	< 0.001	< 0.001

Table 4 Comparison of microscopic examination quality indicators, n (%)

Group	Colonoscopy to cecum rate	To cecum time (minute), mean ± SD	The mirror time (minute), mean ± SD	The detection rate of polyps
Control group (n = 400)	377 (94.25)	6.12 ± 1.33	6.89 ± 0.65	98 (24.50)
Test group (n = 400)	391 (97.75)	5.01 ± 1.01	5.12 ± 0.68	168 (42.00)
χ2/t	6.380	13.293	37.632	27.597
P value	0.012	< 0.001	< 0.001	< 0.001

Table 5 Comparison of compliance evaluation, mean ± SD

Group	Medication preparation (score)	Eating preparation (score)	Total compliance score
Control group (n = 400)	2.87 ± 0.13	1.02 ± 0.22	3.89 ± 0.41
Test group (n = 400)	3.77 ± 0.12	1.68 ± 0.13	5.45 ± 0.31
t	-101.742	-51.656	-60.700
P value	< 0.001	< 0.001	< 0.001

Table 6 Comparison of the occurrence of adverse reactions, n (%)

Group	Abdominal pain	Ventosity	Sicchasia	Vomit	Total occurrence
Control group (n = 400)	21 (5.25)	26 (6.50)	33 (8.25)	15 (3.75)	95 (23.75)
Test group (n = 400)	12 (3.00)	11 (2.75)	15 (3.75)	6 (1.50)	44 (11.00)
χ2	-	-	-	-	22.647
P value	-	-	-	-	< 0.001