BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Meta-Analysis
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastrointest Oncol. Dec 15, 2025; 17(12): 110395
Published online Dec 15, 2025. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v17.i12.110395
Table 1 Summary of included studies in meta-analysis
Ref.
Country
Study type
Total (Male:Female:Unknown)
Follow-up (months)
NOS score
Sample
Cut-off value
Detecting methods
Index (ECM target)
Number (High:Low) (n)
Tumor size (cm) (> 5)
High AFP (> 200)
Venous infiltration
TNM stage (advanced)
Differentiation
Prognosis
Analysis type
Fang et al[25], 2018ChinaRetrospective cohort90:11417HCC tissueThe mean value of thickness of the stroma > 238.6 μmIHC stainingα-SMA52:4841:3329:1823:2425:28NANANA
Eguchi et al[24], 2023JapanRetrospective cohort49:22NA7iCCA resected specimensnoIHC stainingα-SMA22:49NANA17:2715:27NAOSMultivariate
Cioca et al[23], 2017RomaniaCross-sectional study50:22NA6HCC tissuenoIHC stainingPodoplanin23:499:17NA6:195:21NANANA
Lan et al[26], 2022JapanRetrospective cohort88:7734.87iCCAPositive (> 0)IHC stainingCAV178:80NANANANA28:23OSMultivariate
Zhang et al[30], 2017ChinaRetrospective cohort33:381.3-63.27iCCAIHC staining score ≥ 2IHC stainingα-SMA45:2627:12NA4:123:1220:5OSMultivariate
IHC staining score ≥ 2IHC stainingFSP-160:1133:7NA5:032:324:1OSUnivariate
IHC staining score ≥ 2IHC stainingPDGFRβ56:1529:10NA4:129:619:6OSUnivariate
Amer et al[22], 2022EgyptRetrospective cohort47:13NA6HCC tissueNAIHC stainingPodoplanin41:1937:15NA3:8NANANANA
Guan et al[31], 2018ChinaRetrospective cohort105NA5HCC tissue30% positive stainingIHC stainingCav-1NANANANANANAOSUnivariate
Peng et al[27], 2022ChinaRetrospective cohort253:121NA6HCC tissues and normal tissuesAccording to the median expression value of RAB42IHC stainingRAB42186:187NA66:51NA121:139NAOSUnivariate
Peng et al[28], 2022ChinaRetrospective cohort253:122NA6HCC tissues and normal liver tissuesAccording to the median expression value of RAB6BIHC stainingRAB6B186:187NA59:58NA125:135NAOSUnivariate
Wang et al[29], 2016ChinaRetrospective cohort124605HCC tissuesNAIHC stainingα-SMANANANANANANAOSMultivariate
Table 2 All pooled results in meta-analysis
Marker
Outcome
Cancer type
Number of cohorts
Pooled effect size
heterogeneity
Publication bias with Egger’s test (P value)
OR/HR (95%CI)
P value
P value
I2 (%)
All markersTumor size (cm) (> 5)LC61.27 (0.81-1.99)0.30.503< 0.01%0.832
HCC31.60 (0.86-2.96)0.1380.734< 0.01%0.506
iCCA30.98 (0.51-1.89)0.9490.27522.50%0.284
High AFP (> 200)HCC31.32 (0.99-1.76)0.0610.25726.50%0.383
Venous infiltrationLC61.06 (0.63-1.77)0.840.3766.30%0.416
HCC20.70 (0.37-1.33)0.280.608< 0.01%NA
iCCA42.31 (0.95-5.61)0.0650.911< 0.01%0.355
TNM stage (advanced)LC80.81 (0.63-1.05)0.1090.16233.40%0.061
HCC40.68 (0.51-0.90)0.0070.662< 0.01%0.278
iCCA41.66 (0.95-2.90)0.0770.776< 0.01%0.052
Low differentiationiCCA41.62 (0.98-2.67)0.0610.16940.50%0.244
OSLC91.62 (1.34-1.97)< 0.0010.0352.90%0.256
HCC51.67 (1.34-2.07)< 0.0010.02265.10%0.649
iCCA41.47 (0.97-2.23)0.070.15343.10%0.402
SMAVenous infiltrationLC31.25 (0.67-2.34)0.4790.17642.50%0.544
HCC10.79 (0.36-1.74)0.564NANANA
iCCA22.70 (0.97-7.49)0.0570.921< 0.01%NA
TNM stage (advanced)LC31.01 (0.60-1.72)0.960.32112.00%0.098
HCC10.66 (0.30-1.46)0.305NANANA
iCCA21.44 (0.70-2.93)0.3210.624< 0.01%NA
OSLC32.13 (1.30-3.51)0.0030.969< 0.01%0.652
HCC12.29 (1.01-5.22)0.048NANANA
iCCA22.04 (1.09-3.81)0.0250.902< 0.01%NA