BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Observational Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastrointest Oncol. Nov 15, 2025; 17(11): 112689
Published online Nov 15, 2025. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v17.i11.112689
Table 1 Baseline data of hepatitis B cirrhosis-related hepatocellular carcinoma post radiofrequency treatment with entecavir, tenofovir disoproxil fumarate and tenofovir alafenamide fumarate, n (%)
Characteristics
ETV
TDF
TAF
P value
n1917652
Gender0.945
    Male151 (79.06)61 (80.26)42 (80.77)
    Female40 (20.94)15 (19.74)10 (19.23)
Age (years) 60.13 ± 8.0557.58 ± 8.2760.12 ± 8.690.067
Family history of CHB0.985
    POS57 (29.84)23 (30.26)16 (30.77)
    NEG134 (70.16)53 (69.74)36 (69.23)
Family history of HCC0.996
    POS30 (15.71)12 (15.79)8 (15.38)
    NEG161 (84.29)64 (84.21)44 (84.62)
Smoking0.992
    POS60 (31.41)24 (31.58)16 (30.77)
    NEG131 (68.59)52 (68.42)36 (69.23)
Hyperlipidemia0.957
    POS32 (16.75)12 (15.79)8 (15.38)
    NEG159 (83.25)64 (84.21)44 (84.62)
Diabetes0.999
    POS40 (20.94)16 (21.05)11 (21.15)
    NEG151 (79.06)60 (78.95)41 (78.85)
BMI (kg/m2)23.12 ± 2.6822.54 ± 2.2722.79 ± 2.140.168
WBC (× 109/L)3.98 ± 1.674.07 ± 1.553.96 ± 1.600.909
HGB (g/L)134.78 ± 19.09137.68 ± 19.8133.43 ± 21.030.417
PLT (× 109/L)83.00 (60.00-132.75)95.00 (63.75-145.00)94.00 (61.05-122.00)0.474
INR1.16 ± 0.181.14 ± 0.141.14 ± 0.220.565
ALB (g/L)41.19 ± 5.4741.68 ± 5.6241.92 ± 4.920.618
ALT (U/L) 20.00 (16.00-27.50)27.00 (22.00-38.25)20.00 (16.00-30.00)< 0.001
AST (U/L)25.00 (20.00-33.00)30.50 (25.00-43.25)22.50 (19.00-30.00)< 0.001
ALP (U/L)88.31 ± 33.02102.16 ± 39.2382.67 ± 32.960.002
GGT (U/L)31.00 (23.00-50.00)47.00 (27.50-74.50)35.00 (25.00-48.00)0.005
TBIL (μmol/L)15.70 (12.30-25.40)14.45 (12.18-23.25)17.25 (12.00-20.92)0.795
eGFR (mL/min/1.73 m2)94.67 ± 14.3595.31 ± 12.1896.16 ± 14.230.638
HBsAg (lgIU/mL) 2.02 (1.43-2.35)2.01 (1.21-2.27)2.26 (1.63-2.92)0.566
HBeAg0.910
    POS48 (25.13)20 (26.31)15 (28.85)
    NEG143 (74.87)56 (73.69)37 (71.15)
HBV DNA0.045
    POS27 (14.14)21 (27.63)11 (21.15)
    NEG164 (85.86)55 (72.37)41 (78.85)
AFP (ng/mL)7.61 (2.90-52.10)11.99 (3.58-36.70)7.81 (3.19-89.35)0.595
Child-Pugh
    A181 (94.76)71 (92.42)49 (94.23)0.764
    B10 (5.24)5 (6.58) 3 (5.77)
BCLC
    0167 (87.43)67 (88.16)45 (86.54)0.672
    A24 (12.57)9 (11.84)7 (13.48)
Table 2 Cox regression analysis of recurrence after radiofrequency in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma
CharacteristicsUnivariate analysis
Multivariate analysis
HR
95%CI
P value
HR
95%CI
P value
Gender
    Male1
    Female1.52 0.83-2.800.174
Age (years) 1.010.99-1.040.300
BMI (kg/m2)1.080.32-3.710.898
WBC (× 109/L)0.930.82-1.060.284
HGB (g/L)1.000.99-1.010.972
PLT (× 109/L)1.010.99-1.200.853
INR1.070.35-3.310.906
ALB (g/L)1.000.96-1.040.895
AST (U/L)0.990.98, 1.000.167
ALP (U/L)1.000.99-1.010.736
TBIL (μmol/L)0.990.97-1.010.292
eGFR (mL/min/1.73 m2)0.980.95-1.060.312
HBsAg (lgIU/mL) 1.030.78-1.360.855
HBeAg
    NEG1
    POS1.290.75-2.210.363
HBV DNA
    NEG1
    POS0.860.48-1.550.626
Child-Pugh
    A1
    B3.880.45-33.210.216
ALT (U/L) 0.990.97-1.000.0740.990.97-1.010.097
GGT (U/L)1.001.00-1.010.0041.011.00-1.010.026
AFP (ng/mL)0.881.00-1.020.0741.011.00-1.010.013
Anti-HBV therapy
ETV11
TDF0.570.35-0.900.0170.620.38-1.020.047
TAF0.520.30-0.910.0210.570.32-1.020.046
BCLC
    011
    A3.701.36-10.050.0103.821.39-10.470.009
Table 3 The multiple Cox regression equations of different antiviral agents on recurrence within 6 months post radiofrequency
Variable
Crude model
Model I
Model II
HR (95%CI)
P value
HR (95%CI)
P value
HR (95%CI)
P value
ETV111
TDF 0.86 (0.37, 2.02)0.7290.78 (0.32, 1.91)0.5931.01 (0.41, 2.53)0.976
TAF0.67 (0.23, 1.96)0.4700.70 (0.24, 2.03)0.5060.82 (0.27, 2.49)0.730
Table 4 The multiple Cox regression equations of different antiviral agents on recurrence within 12 months post radiofrequency
Variable
Crude model
Model I
Model II
HR (95%CI)
P value
HR (95%CI)
P value
HR (95%CI)
P value
ETV111
TDF 0.48 (0.25, 0.92)0.0280.46 (0.23, 0.89)0.0220.52 (0.27, 1.02)0.050
TAF0.42 (0.19, 0.93) 0.0330.44 (0.20, 0.96)0.0390.45 (0.20, 1.01)0.049
Table 5 The multiple Cox regression equations of different antiviral agents on recurrence within 24 months post radiofrequency
VariableCrude model
Model I
Model II
HR (95%CI)
P value
HR (95%CI)
P value
HR (95%CI)
P value
ETV111
TDF 0.46 (0.26, 0.80)0.0060.44 (0.25, 0.77)0.0040.51 (0.29, 0.91)0.022
TAF0.46 (0.25, 0.87)0.0170.48 (0.25, 0.90)0.0220.54 (0.28, 1.03) 0.046
Table 6 The multiple Cox regression equations of different antiviral agents on recurrence within 36 months post radiofrequency
Variable
Crude model
Model I
Model II
HR (95%CI)
P value
HR (95%CI)
P value
HR (95%CI)
P value
ETV111
TDF 0.57 (0.35, 0.90)0.0170.53 (0.33, 0.86)0.0100.57 (0.35, 0.93)0.025
TAF0.52 (0.30, 0.91)0.0210.50 (0.29, 0.89)0.0170.54 (0.31, 0.96)0.037