BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Case Report Open Access
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2025. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
World J Gastrointest Oncol. Nov 15, 2025; 17(11): 112385
Published online Nov 15, 2025. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v17.i11.112385
Patient-derived organoids for the personalized treatment of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor with liver metastases: A case report
Xiao-Min Yang, Yong-Gang He, Xue-Hui Peng, Nan You, Yi-Chen Tang, Lu Zheng, Xiao-Bing Huang, Department of Hepatobiliary, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Army Medical University, Chongqing 400037, China
Wei Sun, Department of General Internal Medicine, Shanxi Province Cancer Hospital, Shanxi Hospital Affiliated to Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Cancer Hospital Affiliated to Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan 030013, Shanxi Province, China
ORCID number: Lu Zheng (0000-0001-5714-6827); Xiao-Bing Huang (0009-0002-3551-9665).
Co-first authors: Xiao-Min Yang and Wei Sun.
Co-corresponding authors: Lu Zheng and Xiao-Bing Huang.
Author contributions: Yang XM and Sun W contributed to manuscript writing and editing; He YG, Peng XH, You N and Tang YC contributed to data collection and data analysis; Zheng L and Huang XB contributed to conceptualization and supervision. Yang XM and Sun W contributed equally to this manuscript and are co-first authors. Zheng L and Huang XB contributed equally to this manuscript and are co- corresponding authors.
Supported by Chongqing Natural Science Foundation General Project, No. CSTB2023NSCQ-MSX0182 and No. CSTB2023NSCQ-MSX0252; and Clinical Research Special Project of The Second Affiliated Hospital of Army Medical University, No. 2024 F022.
Informed consent statement: Informed written consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this report and any accompanying images.
Conflict-of-interest statement: The authors report no relevant conflicts of interest for this article.
CARE Checklist (2016) statement: The authors have read the CARE Checklist (2016), and the manuscript was prepared and revised according to the CARE Checklist (2016).
Open Access: This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: https://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Corresponding author: Xiao-Bing Huang, Chief Physician, Department of Hepatobiliary, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Army Medical University, No. 83 Xinqiaozheng Street, Shapingba District, Chongqing 400037, China. 13372618116@tmmu.edu.cn
Received: August 1, 2025
Revised: August 29, 2025
Accepted: October 17, 2025
Published online: November 15, 2025
Processing time: 105 Days and 7.6 Hours

Abstract
BACKGROUND

Liver metastases are very common in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs). When surgical resection is possible, it is typically associated with survival benefits in patients with pNET and liver metastases. Patient-derived organoids are a powerful preclinical platform that show great potential for predicting treatment response, and they have been increasingly applied in precision medicine and cancer research.

CASE SUMMARY

A 51-year-old man was admitted to the hospital with the chief complaint of intermittent dull pain in the upper abdomen for over 3 years. Computerized tomography showed multiple space-occupying lesions in the liver and a neoplasm in the pancreatic body. Pathological results suggested a grade 3 pancreas-derived hepatic neuroendocrine tumor. In combination with relevant examinations, the patient was diagnosed with pNET with liver metastases (grade 3). Transarterial chemoembolization was initially performed with oxaliplatin and 5-fluorouracil, after which the chemotherapy regimen was switched to liposomal irinotecan and cisplatin for a subsequent perfusion, guided by organoid-based drug sensitivity testing. Following interventional treatment, the tumor had decreased in size. However, due to poor treatment compliance and the patient’s preference for surgical management, multiple resections were performed. Postoperatively, liposomal irinotecan combined with cisplatin was continuously admnistered. To date, the patient has survived 18 months with tumor presence, and tumor markers have returned to normal.

CONCLUSION

This case suggests that patient-derived organoids can aid in the optimization of therapeutic decisions in pNET patients with liver metastases to guide personalized treatment and improve survival outcomes.

Key Words: Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors; Liver metastases; Patient-derived organoids; Personalized treatment; Transarterial chemoembolization; Case report

Core Tip: Patient-derived organoids (PDOs) show great potential for predicting treatment response in various cancer types. Although gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasm organoids can retain the pathohistological and functional phenotypes of parental tumors, their roles in predicting clinical outcomes are not known. Here, we report a case of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor with liver metastases in which personalized treatment guided by PDO-based drug sensitivity testing enabled successful surgery and resulted in a favorable prognosis. Therefore, for patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor patients and liver metastases, PDOs can help identify effective chemotherapy regimens, enabling personalized treatment, facilitating surgical resection, and improving survival outcomes.



INTRODUCTION

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs) are a rare and heterogeneous group of neoplasms arising from pancreatic islet cells, with variations in histology, clinical characteristics, and prognosis[1]. They may present as non-infiltrative, slow-growing tumors, locally invasive tumors, or even rapidly metastasizing tumors[2]. Most metastases localize to the liver, and approximately 28%-77% of patients with pNETs will experience liver metastases in their lifetime[3]. Patients with liver metastases may be subjected to local complications such as biliary obstruction, liver insufficiency, and carcinoid syndrome. Additionally, liver metastases are a major risk factor for the prognosis of patients with pNETs[4]. When feasible, surgical resection is significantly associated with the best long-term survival outcomes[5]. Therefore, for patients with pNET liver metastases, comprehensive assessment and multidisciplinary approaches are required to determine the feasibility of surgical resection and the optimal treatment to improve the prognosis.

Over the past decade, the advent of in vitro three-dimensional technologies including organoids has revolutionized the development of human cancer models. Patient-derived organoids (PDOs), an in vitro three-dimensional microstructure, can faithfully recapitulate the intricate spatial architecture and cell heterogeneity of the tissue, and simulate the biological behaviors and functions of parental tumors while preserving biological, genetic and molecular features[6,7]. As a powerful preclinical platform, PDOs have been increasingly applied in precision medicine and cancer research. Importantly, there is a significant association between the use of PDO-based drug sensitivity testing and clinical responses to chemotherapy, radiotherapy and targeted therapy in multiple cancer types[8-10]. Although gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasm organoids have been confirmed to retain the pathohistological and functional phenotypes of parental tumors[7], their roles in the prediction of clinical outcomes have not been presented. Here, we report a case of pNET with liver metastases who successfully received surgical resection after personalized treatment guided by PDO-based drug sensitivity testing, resulting in a favorable prognosis.

CASE PRESENTATION
Chief complaints

A 51-year-old man was admitted to the hospital with the primary complaint of intermittent dull pain in the upper abdomen for over 3 years.

History of present illness

Intermittent dull pain in the upper abdomen for over 3 years.

History of past illness

The patient had no history of malignancies.

Personal and family history

The patient denied any personal and family history.

Physical examination

No abnormalities were found during the patient’s general physical examination.

Laboratory examinations

Laboratory examinations showed alpha fetal protein of 2.88 ng/mL, carbohydrate antigen 19-9 of 75.96 U/mL, carbohydrate antigen 15-3 of 35.10 U/mL and carcinoembryonic antigen of 1.93 ng/mL (Table 1).

Table 1 Changes in tumor markers before and after treatment.
Indicators
AFP (ng/mL)
CA19-9 (U/mL)
CEA (ng/mL)
CA15-3 (U/mL)
Before treatment2.8875.961.9335.10
After second TACE2.995.071.569.10
2 months after surgery 2.1039.001.5120.0
18 months after surgery2.159.191.516.61
Imaging examinations

Computerized tomography (CT) scans showed multiple space-occupying lesions in the liver and a neoplasm in the pancreatic body (Figure 1). Positron emission tomography (PET)/CT examinations further revealed a pancreatic body tumor and multiple liver metastases. Meanwhile, endoscopic ultrasound-guided liver biopsy was performed, among which a portion of the biopsy sample was collected for organoid culture according to the protocols from Kingbio Medical (Chongqing) Co., Ltd. (China) after obtaining informed consent. The reagents related to organoid culture and drug sensitivity testing were all provided by Kingbio Medical (Chongqing) Co., Ltd. (China). Briefly, the biopsy tissue was minced and digested after rinsing with precooled phosphate-buffered saline, and cell pellets were collected by centrifugation. Matrigel was added, and the cells and Matrigel suspension were seeded onto a 6-well plate, with 100 cells per well. The plate was placed in an incubator at 37 °C for 15 minutes. Once the droplets were solidified, Jiabili® culture medium [Cabio Biotech (Wuhan) Co., Ltd., China] for pancreatic cancer was supplemented. At last, the plate was put in a 37 °C, 5% CO2 incubator for 13 days. Drug sensitivity testing was conducted when the organoids became solid spheroids with approximately 70 μm diameters (Figure 2). Subsequently, organoid cell masses were digested into single cells, and a total of 2 × 104 cells were obtained. Cells were resuspended in Jiabili® tumor tissue basic medium II [Cabio Biotech (Wuhan) Co., Ltd., China]. As described previously, organoid drug sensitivity testing concentrations were established based on the blood drug concentration of each drug, including the upper and lower limits of the blood drug concentration[11]. The pre-prepared drug solution and CelltiterGlo 2.0 (Promega Corporation, WI, United States) were supplemented successively, and a microplate reader was used to read the value. Notably, a binary classification method was utilized to evaluate the potential of drugs according to the quantification of the drug’s inhibitory effects on tumor organoid growth. The drug was considered resistant when the inhibitory rate < 50% or sensitive for an inhibitory rate ≥ 50%.

Figure 1
Figure 1 Computed tomography images of the patient before treatment, after transarterial chemoembolization, 2 months and 18 months after surgery. The orange arrows point to the liver lesions, and the yellow arrows point to the pancreatic lesions. TACE: Transarterial chemoembolization.
Figure 2
Figure 2  The growth status of organoids from liver metastatic lesions in a pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor patient.
FINAL DIAGNOSIS

Pathological results of the patient suggested a hepatic neuroendocrine tumor derived from the pancreas, with a propensity for grade 3. Immunohistochemistry from liver puncture tissues showed hepatocyte (-), cytokeratin (CK)-7 (-), cluster of differentiation (CD)-34 (blood vessels +), CD10 (+), CK18 (+), glypican-3 (-), CK (+), chromogranin A (+), synapsin (+), Ki-67 (30%), S100P (-), p53 (wild-type), somatostatin receptor 2 (+), and X-linked alpha-thalassemia/mental retardation syndrome (-) (Figure 3). In combination with relevant examinations, the patient was finally diagnosed as pNET with liver metastases (grade 3) and only palliative debulking could be performed.

Figure 3
Figure 3 Immunohistochemical and hematoxylin and eosin staining results of the liver puncture tissue from a patient with pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. CK: Cytokeratin; CD: Cluster of differentiation; CgA: Chromogranin A; Syn: Synapsin; SSTR2: Somatostatin receptor 2; ATRX: X-linked alpha-thalassemia/mental retardation syndrome; HE: Hematoxylin and eosin.
TREATMENT

After discussion, the patient was advised to first receive anti-tumor treatment, followed by evaluation for later treatment. After communication with the patient and his family, transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) plus oxaliplatin (85 mg/m2), 5-fluorouracil (400 mg/m2) and 5-fluorouracil (2400 mg) was initially perfused for 23 hours. Subsequently, the chemotherapy drugs were switched to liposomal irinotecan (43 mg/m2) and cisplatin (60 mg) for the second 23 hours according to the PDO-based drug sensitivity testing results (Figure 4). CT images revealed that the largest tumor diameters in the pancreas and liver were decreased from 4.6 cm to 3.3 cm and from 3.2 cm to 2.5 cm after interventional treatment, respectively (Figure 1). Based on the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (version 1.1), partial response was achieved in the pancreatic lesion or in the hepatic lesion. However, there was a cancer thrombus at the confluence of the splenic vein and the superior mesenteric vein, and the patient had poor treatment compliance. Considering that the patient was willing to undergo surgical resection, pancreatic body-tail resection, partial resection and anastomosis of the portal vein, total splenectomy, and liver tumor resection were all performed after discussion. Postoperative pathological results showed pNET (grade 3) and hepatic neuroendocrine tumor (grade 3), in which tumor cell metastasis occurred in 1 of 9 lymph nodes. There were no tumor cells at the margins of the portal vein and the pancreas.

Figure 4
Figure 4 The growth status of organoids from liver metastatic lesions drug sensitivity testing result. FOLFIRI: Folinic acid, fluorouracil, and irinotecan; mFOLFOX6: Modified folinic acid, fluorouracil, and oxaliplatin 6.
OUTCOME AND FOLLOW-UP

Two months after surgery, CT scans showed multiple liver metastatic lesions (Figure 1). TACE with liposomal irinotecan and cisplatin was again continuously perfused for 23 hours. After surgical resection, the patient received five total treatment cycles. He is currently alive with tumors for 18 months (Figure 1), and the tumor markers have returned to normal (Table 1).

DISCUSSION

Liver metastases are very common in pNETs. When possible, surgical resection is typically associated with better survival in pNET patients with liver metastases[5,12]. According to data from a large, prospective database, hepatic resection was a significant independent factor for overall survival in neuroendocrine liver metastases[5]. In a previous meta-analysis, a median 5-year overall survival rate of 71% was pooled in patients receiving hepatic resection, and more than 95% of them achieved symptomatic relief[13].

Multimodal therapies including systemic chemotherapy are usually used for patients with liver metastases of non-neuroendocrine origin. Neoadjuvant therapy aims to promote tumor downstaging and maintain stable tumor biology, thus ensuring the feasibility of surgical resection. To identify patients with disease stability and improve survival rates, neoadjuvant chemotherapy is commonly utilized in multiple cancer types before hepatic resection[14,15]. In our study, the patient was diagnosed with pNET with liver metastases (grade 3). Considering that the patient was willing to receive surgical resection, antitumor treatment was recommended after discussion. Therefore, TACE with oxaliplatin and 5-fluorouracil was initially used, then replaced with liposomal irinotecan and cisplatin for the second perfusion based on organoid drug sensitivity testing results. The pancreatic and hepatic lesions both significantly decreased in size after organoid-guided treatment.

Over the past decade, PDOs have been established for various cancer types, with high success rates of generation. In four patients with metastatic neuroendocrine prostate cancer, organoids were successfully generated and showed a high concordance with the original tumors at the genomic, transcriptomic, and epigenomic levels. Meanwhile, organoid-based drug screening generated hypotheses for both single-agent and combination therapies, thereby supporting the clinical use of certain drugs and facilitating the development of novel treatment strategies[16]. Consequently, organoid-based drug screening can serve as a valuable tool for identifying rational therapeutic approaches in cancer. In another study, organoids from neuroendocrine carcinoma of the ampulla of Vater were established. Based on gene expression profiling of the organoids, sex-determining region Y-box transcription factor 9 was identified as a potential prognostic biomarker for biliary tract carcinoma[17]. Additionally, an organoid biobank of neuroendocrine neoplasms has been constructed[7]. Encouraged by these studies, we established pNET organoids from liver metastases and found that tumor lesion size decreased after treatment with drugs guided by PDO-based testing. Due to poor treatment compliance and the patient’s preference for surgery, multiple resections including pancreatic body-tail resection, partial resection and anastomosis of the portal vein, total splenectomy, and liver tumor resection were performed. Postoperatively, liposomal irinotecan plus cisplatin was continuously perfused. The patient has survived to date, and tumor markers have returned to normal.

Notably, the results of the PDO-based drug sensitivity testing in our study only reflected the direct-action ability of drugs on “isolated tumor cells” and could not fully represent their comprehensive therapeutic efficacy in complex microenvironment in vivo. For drugs like sorafenib and lenvatinib, whose mechanisms rely on the tumor microenvironment including the vascular system, the indirect cytotoxicity observed in in vitro assays needs to be interpreted independently in combination with drug action mechanisms. In subsequent studies, we plan to further verify the efficacy of such anti-angiogenic drugs by constructing the a model system containing vascular endothelial cells[18].

CONCLUSION

For pNET patients with liver metastases, PDOs are conducive for screening effective chemotherapy drugs for TACE to facilitate personalized treatment plans, providing opportunities for surgical resection by decreasing tumor size and a novel platform for improving survival outcomes.

Footnotes

Provenance and peer review: Unsolicited article; Externally peer reviewed.

Peer-review model: Single blind

Specialty type: Oncology

Country of origin: China

Peer-review report’s classification

Scientific Quality: Grade B, Grade C

Novelty: Grade B, Grade C

Creativity or Innovation: Grade B, Grade C

Scientific Significance: Grade B, Grade C

P-Reviewer: Zhang C, Assistant Professor, China S-Editor: Zuo Q L-Editor: Filipodia P-Editor: Wang WB

References
1.  Cloyd JM, Poultsides GA. Non-functional neuroendocrine tumors of the pancreas: Advances in diagnosis and management. World J Gastroenterol. 2015;21:9512-9525.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in CrossRef: 81]  [Cited by in RCA: 98]  [Article Influence: 9.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
2.  Sadot E, Reidy-Lagunes DL, Tang LH, Do RK, Gonen M, D'Angelica MI, DeMatteo RP, Kingham TP, Groot Koerkamp B, Untch BR, Brennan MF, Jarnagin WR, Allen PJ. Observation versus Resection for Small Asymptomatic Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: A Matched Case-Control Study. Ann Surg Oncol. 2016;23:1361-1370.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 141]  [Cited by in RCA: 156]  [Article Influence: 17.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
3.  Pavel M, Baudin E, Couvelard A, Krenning E, Öberg K, Steinmüller T, Anlauf M, Wiedenmann B, Salazar R; Barcelona Consensus Conference participants. ENETS Consensus Guidelines for the management of patients with liver and other distant metastases from neuroendocrine neoplasms of foregut, midgut, hindgut, and unknown primary. Neuroendocrinology. 2012;95:157-176.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 608]  [Cited by in RCA: 602]  [Article Influence: 46.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
4.  Cloyd JM, Wiseman JT, Pawlik TM. Surgical management of pancreatic neuroendocrine liver metastases. J Gastrointest Oncol. 2020;11:590-600.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 14]  [Cited by in RCA: 26]  [Article Influence: 5.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
5.  Fairweather M, Swanson R, Wang J, Brais LK, Dutton T, Kulke MH, Clancy TE. Management of Neuroendocrine Tumor Liver Metastases: Long-Term Outcomes and Prognostic Factors from a Large Prospective Database. Ann Surg Oncol. 2017;24:2319-2325.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 67]  [Cited by in RCA: 94]  [Article Influence: 11.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
6.  Jacob F, Salinas RD, Zhang DY, Nguyen PTT, Schnoll JG, Wong SZH, Thokala R, Sheikh S, Saxena D, Prokop S, Liu DA, Qian X, Petrov D, Lucas T, Chen HI, Dorsey JF, Christian KM, Binder ZA, Nasrallah M, Brem S, O'Rourke DM, Ming GL, Song H. A Patient-Derived Glioblastoma Organoid Model and Biobank Recapitulates Inter- and Intra-tumoral Heterogeneity. Cell. 2020;180:188-204.e22.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 503]  [Cited by in RCA: 704]  [Article Influence: 140.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
7.  Kawasaki K, Toshimitsu K, Matano M, Fujita M, Fujii M, Togasaki K, Ebisudani T, Shimokawa M, Takano A, Takahashi S, Ohta Y, Nanki K, Igarashi R, Ishimaru K, Ishida H, Sukawa Y, Sugimoto S, Saito Y, Maejima K, Sasagawa S, Lee H, Kim HG, Ha K, Hamamoto J, Fukunaga K, Maekawa A, Tanabe M, Ishihara S, Hamamoto Y, Yasuda H, Sekine S, Kudo A, Kitagawa Y, Kanai T, Nakagawa H, Sato T. An Organoid Biobank of Neuroendocrine Neoplasms Enables Genotype-Phenotype Mapping. Cell. 2020;183:1420-1435.e21.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 49]  [Cited by in RCA: 150]  [Article Influence: 30.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
8.  Vlachogiannis G, Hedayat S, Vatsiou A, Jamin Y, Fernández-Mateos J, Khan K, Lampis A, Eason K, Huntingford I, Burke R, Rata M, Koh DM, Tunariu N, Collins D, Hulkki-Wilson S, Ragulan C, Spiteri I, Moorcraft SY, Chau I, Rao S, Watkins D, Fotiadis N, Bali M, Darvish-Damavandi M, Lote H, Eltahir Z, Smyth EC, Begum R, Clarke PA, Hahne JC, Dowsett M, de Bono J, Workman P, Sadanandam A, Fassan M, Sansom OJ, Eccles S, Starling N, Braconi C, Sottoriva A, Robinson SP, Cunningham D, Valeri N. Patient-derived organoids model treatment response of metastatic gastrointestinal cancers. Science. 2018;359:920-926.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 1436]  [Cited by in RCA: 1376]  [Article Influence: 196.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
9.  Ganesh K, Wu C, O'Rourke KP, Szeglin BC, Zheng Y, Sauvé CG, Adileh M, Wasserman I, Marco MR, Kim AS, Shady M, Sanchez-Vega F, Karthaus WR, Won HH, Choi SH, Pelossof R, Barlas A, Ntiamoah P, Pappou E, Elghouayel A, Strong JS, Chen CT, Harris JW, Weiser MR, Nash GM, Guillem JG, Wei IH, Kolesnick RN, Veeraraghavan H, Ortiz EJ, Petkovska I, Cercek A, Manova-Todorova KO, Saltz LB, Lavery JA, DeMatteo RP, Massagué J, Paty PB, Yaeger R, Chen X, Patil S, Clevers H, Berger MF, Lowe SW, Shia J, Romesser PB, Dow LE, Garcia-Aguilar J, Sawyers CL, Smith JJ. A rectal cancer organoid platform to study individual responses to chemoradiation. Nat Med. 2019;25:1607-1614.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 305]  [Cited by in RCA: 381]  [Article Influence: 63.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
10.  Kim J, Yu D, Kwon Y, Lee KS, Sim SH, Kong SY, Lee ES, Park IH, Park C. Genomic Characteristics of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Nominate Molecular Subtypes That Predict Chemotherapy Response. Mol Cancer Res. 2020;18:253-263.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 7]  [Cited by in RCA: 27]  [Article Influence: 4.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
11.  He Y, Zhu Y, Wang W, Yi Y, Wang Z, Zhao C, Li J, Huang X, Zheng L. Clinical efficacy and chemoresistance analysis of precision neoadjuvant chemotherapy for borderline resectable pancreatic cancer: a prospective, single-arm pilot study. Int J Surg. 2025;111:3269-3280.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 2]  [Cited by in RCA: 6]  [Article Influence: 6.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
12.  Mayo SC, de Jong MC, Bloomston M, Pulitano C, Clary BM, Reddy SK, Clark Gamblin T, Celinski SA, Kooby DA, Staley CA, Stokes JB, Chu CK, Arrese D, Ferrero A, Schulick RD, Choti MA, Geschwind JF, Strub J, Bauer TW, Adams RB, Aldrighetti L, Mentha G, Capussotti L, Pawlik TM. Surgery versus intra-arterial therapy for neuroendocrine liver metastasis: a multicenter international analysis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011;18:3657-3665.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 122]  [Cited by in RCA: 134]  [Article Influence: 9.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
13.  Saxena A, Chua TC, Perera M, Chu F, Morris DL. Surgical resection of hepatic metastases from neuroendocrine neoplasms: a systematic review. Surg Oncol. 2012;21:e131-e141.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 109]  [Cited by in RCA: 106]  [Article Influence: 8.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
14.  Brouquet A, Abdalla EK, Kopetz S, Garrett CR, Overman MJ, Eng C, Andreou A, Loyer EM, Madoff DC, Curley SA, Vauthey JN. High survival rate after two-stage resection of advanced colorectal liver metastases: response-based selection and complete resection define outcome. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:1083-1090.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 276]  [Cited by in RCA: 306]  [Article Influence: 21.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
15.  Martel G, Hawel J, Rekman J, Croome KP, Bertens K, Balaa FK, Hernandez-Alejandro R. Liver resection for non-colorectal, non-carcinoid, non-sarcoma metastases: a multicenter study. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0120569.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 20]  [Cited by in RCA: 22]  [Article Influence: 2.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
16.  Puca L, Bareja R, Prandi D, Shaw R, Benelli M, Karthaus WR, Hess J, Sigouros M, Donoghue A, Kossai M, Gao D, Cyrta J, Sailer V, Vosoughi A, Pauli C, Churakova Y, Cheung C, Deonarine LD, McNary TJ, Rosati R, Tagawa ST, Nanus DM, Mosquera JM, Sawyers CL, Chen Y, Inghirami G, Rao RA, Grandori C, Elemento O, Sboner A, Demichelis F, Rubin MA, Beltran H. Patient derived organoids to model rare prostate cancer phenotypes. Nat Commun. 2018;9:2404.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 221]  [Cited by in RCA: 272]  [Article Influence: 38.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
17.  Saito Y, Muramatsu T, Kanai Y, Ojima H, Sukeda A, Hiraoka N, Arai E, Sugiyama Y, Matsuzaki J, Uchida R, Yoshikawa N, Furukawa R, Saito H. Establishment of Patient-Derived Organoids and Drug Screening for Biliary Tract Carcinoma. Cell Rep. 2019;27:1265-1276.e4.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 87]  [Cited by in RCA: 163]  [Article Influence: 27.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
18.  Grebenyuk S, Ranga A. Engineering Organoid Vascularization. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2019;7:39.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 130]  [Cited by in RCA: 209]  [Article Influence: 34.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]