Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastrointest Oncol. Oct 15, 2025; 17(10): 109506
Published online Oct 15, 2025. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v17.i10.109506
Published online Oct 15, 2025. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v17.i10.109506
Table 1 Patient characteristics at baseline, n (%)/mean ± SD
| Characteristic | Value or case |
| Male | 83 (66.40) |
| Age (years) | 56.74 ± 11.25 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 23.58 ± 3.45 |
| History of hepatitis B | 63 (50.40) |
| Alcoholic liver disease | 19 (15.20) |
| Family history of liver cancer | 28 (22.40) |
| ALT (U/L) | 48.73 ± 21.16 |
| AST (U/L) | 44.82 ± 19.87 |
| ALB (g/L) | 38.42 ± 4.37 |
| TBIL (μmol/L) | 22.48 ± 6.89 |
| AFP (ng/mL) | 392.35 ± 106.33 |
| Single lesion | 91 (72.80) |
| Maximum diameter of lesion (cm) | 3.74 ± 1.85 |
| Clear boundary | 88 (70.40) |
| Hypoechoic lesions | 72 (57.60) |
Table 2 Pathological typing
| Project | n (%) |
| Conventional type HCC | 89 (71.20) |
| Clear cell HCC | 24 (19.20) |
| Fibrolamellar HCC | 12 (9.60) |
| Grade I (highly differentiated) | 18 (14.40) |
| Grade II (moderate differentiation) | 64 (51.20) |
| Grade III-IV (low differentiation) | 43 (34.40) |
| Ki-67 > 20% | 47 (37.60) |
| CK19 positive | 29 (23.20) |
| AFP positive | 98 (78.40) |
| Glypican-3 positive | 113 (90.40) |
| MVI positive | 42 (33.60) |
| Capsule invasion | 31 (24.80) |
Table 3 Contrast mode
| Project | n (%) |
| Fast-in and fast-out | 45 (36) |
| Fast-in and slow-out | 50 (40) |
| Continuous enhancement | 30 (24) |
Table 4 Arterial phase enhancement time
| Project | n (%) |
| APT < 15 seconds | 50 (40) |
| APT ≥ 15 seconds | 75 (60) |
Table 5 Washout initiation time and washout completion time
| Project | n (%) |
| WIT < 60 seconds | 55 (44) |
| WIT ≥ 60 seconds | 70 (56) |
| WCT < 180 seconds | 60 (48) |
| WCT ≥ 180 seconds | 65 (52) |
Table 6 Longest diameter and enhanced area
| Project | n (%) |
| LD ≤ 3 cm | 50 (40) |
| LD > 3 cm | 75 (60) |
| EA ≤ 10 cm2 | 52 (41.60) |
| EA > 10 cm2 | 73 (58.40) |
Table 7 Boundary characteristics of lesions
| Boundary characteristics category | n (%) |
| Clear boundary | 49 (39.20) |
| Fuzzy boundary | 42 (33.60) |
| Annular enhancement at the edge | 34 (27.20) |
Table 8 Correlation analysis results
Table 9 Results of logistic regression analysis
Table 10 Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis results
| Indicator | Cutoff value | Sensitivity (%) | Specificity (%) | AUC | 95%CI | Youden’s index |
| PEI | 1.45 | 85.2 | 72.5 | 0.893 | 0.840-0.946 | 0.577 |
| WIT | 12.3 | 78.9 | 67.3 | 0.851 | 0.796-0.906 | 0.463 |
| Boundary characteristics of lesions | 0.98 | 80.5 | 69.1 | 0.876 | 0.822-0.930 | 0.495 |
| APT | 10.5 | 82.4 | 74.1 | 0.864 | 0.810-0.918 | 0.564 |
Table 11 Subgroup analysis situation
| Indicator | CEUS sensitivity (%) | CEUS specificity (%) | CT/MRI sensitivity (%) | CT/MRI specificity (%) | P value |
| Overall | 89.7 | 85.2 | 91.1 | 88.3 | > 0.05 |
| LI-RADS 5 | 82.4 | 92.1 | 87.3 | 94.6 | 0.032a |
- Citation: Dong Y, Chen LP, He JG, Yang QQ, Hu ZW. Clinical value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in early diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2025; 17(10): 109506
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5204/full/v17/i10/109506.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4251/wjgo.v17.i10.109506
