Ma ZH, Wang YP, Zheng WH, Ma J, Bai X, Zhang Y, Wang YH, Chi D, Fu XB, Hua XD. Prognostic factors and therapeutic effects of different treatment modalities for colorectal cancer liver metastases. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2020; 12(10): 1177-1194 [PMID: 33133385 DOI: 10.4251/wjgo.v12.i10.1177]
Corresponding Author of This Article
Xiang-Dong Hua, MD, Chief Doctor, Surgeon, Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Cancer Hospital of China Medical University, Liaoning Cancer Hospital and Institute, No. 44 Xiaoheyan Road, Shenyang 110042, Liaoning Province, China. lnzl_hxd@163.com
Research Domain of This Article
Gastroenterology & Hepatology
Article-Type of This Article
Retrospective Study
Open-Access Policy of This Article
This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
World J Gastrointest Oncol. Oct 15, 2020; 12(10): 1177-1194 Published online Oct 15, 2020. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v12.i10.1177
Table 1 Comparison of clinicopathological data of the four groups of patients
Drug
Ablation
Intervention
Surgical resection
Statistical value
P value
Gender
χ2 = 2.459
0.483
Male
8
19
10
24
Female
5
4
5
12
Age (yr)
62.77 ± 8.55
60.39 ± 9.33
63.13 ± 10.57
57.50 ± 12.52
F = 1.337
0.268
Primary tumor size (cm)
5.08 ± 2.17
4.35 ± 1.40
5.37 ± 2.72
5.10 ± 2.06
F = 0.940
0.425
Primary tumor site
χ2 = 11.729
0.068
Right colon
6
6
3
7
Left colon
5
4
3
16
Rectum
2
13
9
13
Pathological type
χ2 = 3.032
0.387
Non-MUC
11
20
11
33
MUC
2
3
4
3
Differentiation
χ2 = 7.807
0.253
High
4
4
1
10
Moderate
7
13
8
22
Low
2
6
6
4
CEA (ng/mL)
χ2 = 2.950
0.339
≤ 15
11
13
10
24
> 15
2
10
5
12
CA19-9 (U/mL)
χ2 = 0.576
0.902
≤ 37
10
15
10
25
> 37
3
8
5
11
LMN
χ2 = 4.346
0.226
No
6
14
7
12
Yes
7
9
8
24
CLM distribution
χ2 = 17.169
0.009
Right lobe
4
15
4
14
Left lobe
5
0
1
5
Both lobes
4
8
10
17
CLM number
χ2 = 5.051
0.168
≤ 4
8
16
5
21
> 4
5
7
10
15
Proximity to great vessels
χ2 = 23.693
0.000
No
12
21
5
31
Yes
1
2
10
5
Maximum CLM diameter (cm)
4.96 ± 2.81
4.72 ± 1.74
5.03 ± 1.39
2.93 ± 1.11
F = 9.627
0.000
Total chemotherapy time
χ2 = 5.729
0.126
< 6 mo
13
18
14
27
≥ 6 mo
0
5
1
9
Table 2 Single factor analysis of prognosis of the patients
Variable
n
Recurrent-free survival (%)
χ2
P value
1 yr
3 yr
Gender
0.977
0.323
Male
61
91.4
55.9
Female
26
78.3
46.5
Age (yr)
0.509
0.475
≤ 60
50
82.7
49.6
> 60
37
94.2
57.4
Primary tumor size (cm)
0.006
0.937
≤ 5
66
87.1
56.2
> 5
21
89.5
46.4
Primary tumor site
5.365
0.068
Right colon
22
85.2
38.8
Left colon
37
83.2
47.3
Rectum
28
96.0
75.1
Differentiation
9.228
0.010
High
19
83.9
77.9
Moderate
50
93.2
55.4
Low
18
76.5
29.4
Pathological type
0.000
0.987
Non–MUC
75
88.4
51.2
MUC
12
83.3
64.3
CEA (ng/mL)
5.636
0.018
≤ 15
58
92.3
65.2
> 15
29
85.8
20.2
CA199 (U/mL)
0.029
0.866
≤ 37
60
92.3
55.0
> 37
27
85.5
52.2
LMN
0.385
0.535
No
39
91.2
55.3
Yes
48
83.2
51.3
CLM distribution
1.036
0.596
Right lobe
37
82.5
53.9
Left lobe
11
90.9
56.6
Both lobes
39
91.6
52.7
CLM number
4.152
0.042
≤ 4
50
90.7
59.6
> 4
37
91.4
29.1
Maximum CLM diameter
10.732
0.001
≤ 5 cm
65
93.2
61.4
> 5 cm
22
85.2
18.7
CLM treatments
8.158
0.043
Drug
13
90.9
51.9
Ablation
23
72.5
37.5
Intervention
15
92.3
34.6
Surgical resection
36
96.8
61.9
Proximity to great vessels
4.412
0.036
No
69
90.5
59.6
Yes
18
77.4
36.1
Postoperative chemotherapy time
0.367
0.545
≤ 6 mo
72
79.4
42.8
> 6 mo
15
89.5
56.3
Table 3 Multifactor analysis
Variable
B
SE
Wald
df
Sig.
Exp(B)
Step 1
Differentiation
4.174
2
0.124
Differentiation (1)
-0.865
0.590
2.148
1
0.143
0.421
Differentiation (2)
-0.763
0.406
3.528
1
0.060
0.466
CEA classification
0.076
0.434
0.030
1
0.861
1.079
Number of metastases
-0.758
0.416
3.323
1
0.068
0.468
Size of metastases
1.516
0.396
14.616
1
0.000
4.552
Proximity to great vessles
-0.794
0.417
3.616
1
0.057
0.452
Liver treatment
-0.094
0.174
0.288
1
0.591
0.911
Step 2
Differentiation
4.173
2
0.124
Differentiation (1)
-0.860
0.589
2.133
1
0.144
0.423
Differentiation (2)
-0.749
0.398
3.532
1
0.060
0.473
Number of metastases
-0.754
0.414
3.312
1
0.069
0.471
Size of metastases
1.526
0.392
15.190
1
0.000
4.599
Proximity to great vessles
-0.797
0.417
3.656
1
0.056
0.451
Liver treatment
-0.097
0.174
0.308
1
0.579
0.908
Step 3
Differentiation
4.373
2
0.112
Differentiation (1)
-0.839
0.585
2.057
1
0.151
0.432
Differentiation (2)
-0.776
0.396
3.834
1
0.050
0.460
Number of metastases
-0.795
0.409
3.778
1
0.052
0.451
Size of metastases
1.583
0.379
17.438
1
0.000
4.870
Proximity to great vessles
-0.793
0.416
3.639
1
0.056
0.452
Step 4
Number of metastases
-0.910
0.405
5.065
1
0.024
0.402
Size of metastases
1.490
0.366
16.596
1
0.000
4.438
Proximity to great vessles
-1.001
0.396
6.384
1
0.012
0.367
Differentiation
1.384
0.392
7.238
1
0.008
0.507
Table 4 Comparison of clinicopathology between not-near great vessel group (A) and near great vessel group (B)
A
B
Statistics
P value
Gender
χ2 = 0.048
0.826
Male
48
13
Female
21
5
Age (yr)
59.22 ± 10.34
63.11 ± 12.90
t = 1.350
0.181
Primary tumor size (cm)
4.73 ± 1.84
5.75 ± 2.65
t = 1.900
0.061
Primary tumor site
χ2 = 0.519
0.771
Right colon
18
4
Left colon
23
5
Rectum
28
9
Pathological type
χ2 = 0.456
0.500
Non-MUC
60
15
MUC
19
3
Differentiation
χ2 = 4.581
0.101
High
16
3
Medium
42
8
Low
11
7
CEA (ng/mL)
χ2 = 0.315
0.574
≤ 15
45
13
> 15
24
5
CA19-9 (U/mL)
χ2 = 0.654
0.419
≤ 37
49
11
> 37
20
7
LMN
χ2 = 0.001
0.971
No
31
8
Yes
38
10
CLM distribution
χ2 = 2.546
0.280
Right lobe
32
5
Left lobe
9
2
Both lobes
28
11
CLM number
χ2 = 3.206
0.073
≤ 4
43
7
> 4
26
11
Maximum CLM diameter (cm)
4.04 ± 1.97
4.19 ± 1.69
t = 0.309
0.758
Postoperative chemotherapy time
χ2 = 1.766
0.184
≤ 6 mo
59
13
> 6 mo
10
5
CLM treatments
χ2 = 23.693
0.000
Drug
12
1
Ablation
21
2
Intervention
5
10
Surgical resection
31
5
Citation: Ma ZH, Wang YP, Zheng WH, Ma J, Bai X, Zhang Y, Wang YH, Chi D, Fu XB, Hua XD. Prognostic factors and therapeutic effects of different treatment modalities for colorectal cancer liver metastases. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2020; 12(10): 1177-1194