Mu XD, Ji DX, Kang DQ. Application value of multiphase contrast-enhanced computed tomography radiomics in preoperative evaluation of peritoneal metastasis in gastric cancer. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2026; 18(2): 115404 [DOI: 10.4251/wjgo.v18.i2.115404]
Corresponding Author of This Article
De-Qiang Kang, MD, Department of Radiology, Peking University International Hospital, No. 1 Shengyuan Road, Zhongguancun Life Science Park, Changping District, Beijing 102206, China. pkuih_rad@126.com
Research Domain of This Article
Gastroenterology & Hepatology
Article-Type of This Article
Retrospective Study
Open-Access Policy of This Article
This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Feb 15, 2026 (publication date) through Feb 3, 2026
Times Cited of This Article
Times Cited (0)
Journal Information of This Article
Publication Name
World Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology
ISSN
1948-5204
Publisher of This Article
Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA
Share the Article
Mu XD, Ji DX, Kang DQ. Application value of multiphase contrast-enhanced computed tomography radiomics in preoperative evaluation of peritoneal metastasis in gastric cancer. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2026; 18(2): 115404 [DOI: 10.4251/wjgo.v18.i2.115404]
World J Gastrointest Oncol. Feb 15, 2026; 18(2): 115404 Published online Feb 15, 2026. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v18.i2.115404
Application value of multiphase contrast-enhanced computed tomography radiomics in preoperative evaluation of peritoneal metastasis in gastric cancer
Xiao-Dan Mu, Dong-Xu Ji, De-Qiang Kang
Xiao-Dan Mu, Dong-Xu Ji, De-Qiang Kang, Department of Radiology, Peking University International Hospital, Beijing 102206, China
Co-first authors: Xiao-Dan Mu and Dong-Xu Ji.
Author contributions: Mu XD and Ji DX contributed equally to this study as co-first authors; Mu XD was responsible for study design, radiomics analysis, statistical analysis, manuscript writing; Ji DX was responsible for data collection, validation, manuscript writing; Kang DQ was responsible for study conception, supervision, funding acquisition, manuscript revision; all authors approved the final manuscript.
Institutional review board statement: This study was approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of Peking University International Hospital (Approval No. 2025XJ0193).
Informed consent statement: As a retrospective study using anonymized data, the requirement for informed consent was waived by the ethics committee.
Conflict-of-interest statement: The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest relevant to this study.
Data sharing statement: The datasets generated and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. All data are de-identified to protect patient privacy.
Open Access: This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: https://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Corresponding author: De-Qiang Kang, MD, Department of Radiology, Peking University International Hospital, No. 1 Shengyuan Road, Zhongguancun Life Science Park, Changping District, Beijing 102206, China. pkuih_rad@126.com
Received: November 4, 2025 Revised: December 3, 2025 Accepted: December 17, 2025 Published online: February 15, 2026 Processing time: 90 Days and 17.4 Hours
Abstract
BACKGROUND
Peritoneal metastasis occurs in 10%-45% of gastric cancer patients and significantly impacts prognosis and treatment decisions. Traditional computed tomography (CT) imaging has limited sensitivity (60%-80%) for detecting early peritoneal metastases, while laparoscopic exploration is invasive. Multiphase contrast-enhanced CT radiomics offers a non-invasive approach to improve preoperative prediction, yet most existing studies rely on single-phase analysis without fully exploiting multiphase data advantages.
AIM
To construct a preoperative prediction model for gastric cancer peritoneal metastasis based on multiphase contrast-enhanced CT radiomics, compare the diagnostic efficacy between multiphase combined and single-phase analysis, and evaluate its clinical application value.
METHODS
A retrospective analysis was conducted on 200 pathologically confirmed gastric cancer patients from January 2020 to December 2024, all of whom underwent preoperative multiphase contrast-enhanced CT examination. Patients were randomly divided into training set (n = 140) and validation set (n = 60) at a 7:3 ratio. PyRadiomics was used to extract 3920 radiomics features from arterial phase, venous phase, and delayed phase images. Synthetic minority oversampling technique was applied to handle class imbalance. Feature selection was performed through Z-score standardization, univariate screening, collinearity testing, and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression. Single-phase and multiphase combined radiomics models were constructed using logistic regression, support vector machine, and random forest algorithms. Model performance was evaluated through receiver operating characteristic curves.
RESULTS
The multiphase combined model achieved an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.876 (95% confidence interval: 0.783-0.941) in the validation set, with sensitivity of 81.0%, specificity of 84.6%, and accuracy of 83.3%, significantly superior to all single-phase models (P < 0.05). Among single-phase models, the venous phase model performed best (AUC = 0.834). Hosmer-Lemeshow test showed good model calibration (P = 0.765). Decision curve analysis demonstrated that at a threshold probability of 0.35, the multiphase combined model could avoid 33.7% of unnecessary exploratory surgeries.
CONCLUSION
The multiphase combined model based on multiphase contrast-enhanced CT radiomics can effectively predict gastric cancer peritoneal metastasis, with diagnostic performance significantly superior to single-phase models, providing a new non-invasive technical approach for individualized preoperative assessment of gastric cancer patients.
Core Tip: Multiphase contrast-enhanced computed tomography radiomics enables non-invasive preoperative prediction of peritoneal metastasis in gastric cancer. In a 200-patient cohort, a combined arterial-venous-delayed model (logistic regression within a leakage-free pipeline) outperformed single-phase models, achieving area under the curve 0.876 with good calibration and decision-curve net benefit. The approach may help triage candidates for staging laparoscopy, reduce unnecessary exploratory procedures, and support individualized treatment planning. Reporting follows IBSI/TRIPOD-AI, with feature robustness, cross-validation, and external temporal testing recommended for future multicenter deployment.