Published online Nov 15, 2025. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v17.i11.112981
Revised: August 30, 2025
Accepted: October 11, 2025
Published online: November 15, 2025
Processing time: 94 Days and 16.2 Hours
Gastric cancer is one of the most common malignant tumors of the digestive system globally, with a generally poor prognosis for patients with advanced dis
To develop and validate a novel survival prediction model for assessing the survival risk of advanced HER-2 negative gastric cancer patients receiving immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy, thereby enhancing the accuracy of prognostic evaluation and its clinical guidance value.
This retrospective study included 200 advanced HER-2 negative gastric cancer patients who received programmed cell death protein 1 inhibitors combined with chemotherapy. Independent prognostic factors for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were identified using multivariable Cox regression analysis, and a nomogram model was constructed based on these factors. The variables included in the regression analysis were selected based on their clinical relevance, routine application in gastric cancer evaluation, and availability within our dataset. The model’s discrimination and calibration were assessed using the concordance index (C-index), the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), and calibration plots.
Among the 200 advanced HER-2 negative gastric cancer patients, multivariable Cox regression analysis identified programmed death-ligand 1 expression level, microsatellite status, tumor-node-metastasis stage, tumor differentiation, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, and C-reactive protein-albumin-lymphocyte index as independent prognostic factors for PFS and OS (all P values < 0.05). Based on these variables, nomogram models for PFS and OS were constructed. In the training set, the C-index for the PFS model was 0.82 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.77-0.87], and in the internal validation set, it was 0.78 (95%CI: 0.70-0.87), indicating good discrimination ability. For AUC evaluation, the PFS model’s 3-month and 6-month prediction AUCs in the training set were 0.79 (95%CI: 0.65-0.92) and 0.89 (95%CI: 0.83-0.94), respectively. In the validation set, they were 0.82 (95%CI: 0.68-0.97) and 0.80 (95%CI: 0.68-0.92), respectively. For OS prediction, the C-index in the training set and validation set were 0.81 (95%CI: 0.76-0.86) and 0.78 (95%CI: 0.69-0.87), respectively. The nomogram also showed high accuracy in predicting OS at 12, 15, and 18 months. In the training set, the AUCs were 0.82 (95%CI: 0.75-0.89), 0.91 (95%CI: 0.86-0.97), and 0.89 (95%CI: 0.83-0.95), respectively. In the validation set, they were 0.79 (95%CI: 0.66-0.91), 0.84 (95%CI: 0.73-0.96), and 0.81 (95%CI: 0.69-0.93), respectively. Furthermore, calibration curves demonstrated that the predicted probabilities of the model were highly consistent with the actual observed values at different time points, suggesting that the model has good reliability and adaptability for clinical application.
The nomogram model developed in this study effectively predicts the survival outcomes of advanced HER-2 negative gastric cancer patients receiving immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy, demonstrating good discrimination and consistency, and providing robust support for personalized clinical treatment decisions.
Core Tip: This study developed and validated a novel survival prediction model for advanced HER-2 negative gastric cancer patients receiving immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy. A retrospective analysis of 200 patients identified programmed death ligand 1 expression, microsatellite instability, tumor-node-metastasis stage, tumor differentiation, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, and C-reactive protein-albumin-lymphocyte index as independent prognostic factors. Based on these factors, nomogram models for progression-free survival and overall survival were constructed and validated using the concordance index (C-index) and area under the curve. The results showed good discrimination ability in both the training and validation sets, indicating that the model effectively predicts patient survival outcomes and provides strong support for personalized treatment decisions.
