Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Hepatol. May 27, 2026; 18(5): 117441
Published online May 27, 2026. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v18.i5.117441
Published online May 27, 2026. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v18.i5.117441
Table 1 Sociodemographic characteristics of the three study groups, n (%)
| Variable | Control (n = 48) | Subclinical hypothyroidism (n = 48) | Overt hypothyroidism (n = 48) | P value |
| Gender | ||||
| Female | 38 (79.2) | 40 (83.3) | 41 (85.4) | 0.792 |
| Male | 10 (20.8) | 8 (16.7) | 7 (14.6) | |
| Age (years), mean ± SD | 39 ± 12 | 39 ± 8 | 36 ± 9 | 0.209 |
| BMI (kg/m2), mean ± SD | 30.7 ± 2.3 | 30.7 ± 2.6 | 31.5 ± 2.4 | 0.193 |
Table 2 Laboratory characteristics of study groups, mean ± SD
| Variable | Overt hypothyroidism (A) | Subclinical hypothyroidism (B) | Control (C) | P value | Pairwise comparison |
| TSH (mIU/L) | 27.6 ± 29 | 7.1 ± 2.4 | 2.5 ± 1 | < 0.001 | A vs B: < 0.001 |
| A vs C: < 0.001 | |||||
| B vs C: 0.553 | |||||
| FT4 (ng/dL) | 1 ± 0.4 | 1.1 ± 0.2 | 1.2 ± 0.2 | < 0.001 | A vs C: < 0.001 |
| B vs C: 0.009 | |||||
| A vs B: 0.250 | |||||
| ALT (U/L) | 35 ± 64.5 | 18.7 ± 10.2 | 20.6 ± 9.5 | 0.077 | A vs B: 0.115 |
| A vs C: 0.203 | |||||
| B vs C: 1.000 | |||||
| AST (U/L) | 29.8 ± 33.9 | 20.8 ±7.4 | 19.7 ± 6.5 | 0.033 | A vs B: 0.100 |
| A vs C: 0.051 | |||||
| B vs C: 1.000 | |||||
| Total cholesterol (mg/dL) | 206.8 ± 37.9 | 178 ± 30.8 | 151.6 ± 35.5 | < 0.001 | A vs B: < 0.001 |
| A vs C: < 0.001 | |||||
| B vs C: < 0.001 | |||||
| High density lipoprotein (mg/dL) | 50.4 ± 12.5 | 48.9 ± 12.5 | 46.3 ± 18.7 | 0.381 | A vs B: 1.000 |
| A vs C: 0.510 | |||||
| B vs C: 1.000 | |||||
| Low density lipoprotein (mg/dL) | 130.8 ± 34.2 | 110.4 ± 26.3 | 87.2 ± 36.6 | < 0.001 | A vs B: 0.008 |
| A vs C: < 0.001 | |||||
| B vs C: 0.002 | |||||
| Triglycerides (mg/dL), median (range) | 107 (31-356) | 84 (31-322) | 73.5 (37-344) | 0.004 | A vs B: 0.032 |
| A vs C: 0.005 | |||||
| B vs C: 0.564 |
Table 3 Prevalence of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease among the three study groups, n (%)
| Variable | Overt hypothyroidism (A) (n = 48) | Subclinical hypothyroidism (B) (n = 48) | Control (C) (n = 48) | P value | Paire-wise comparison |
| MASLD by ultrasound | |||||
| Non-MASLD | 13 (27.1) | 21 (43.8) | 45 (93.8) | < 0.001 | A vs B: 0.135 |
| MASLD | 35 (72.9) | 27 (56.3) | 3 (6.3) | A vs C: < 0.001 | |
| B vs C: < 0.001 | |||||
| MASLD by MRI | |||||
| Non-MASLD | 14 (29.2) | 21 (43.8) | 45 (93.8) | < 0.001 | A vs B: 0.203 |
| MASLD | 34 (70.8) | 27 (56.3) | 3 (6.3) | A vs C: < 0.001 | |
| B vs C: < 0.001 | |||||
Table 4 Sociodemographic characteristics of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease and non-metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease groups, n (%)
Table 5 Laboratory characteristics of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease and non-metabolic dysfunction-associated steatoic liver disease groups, mean ± SD
| Variable | MASLD | Non-MASLD | P value |
| ALT (U/L) | 30.3 ± 56.5 | 20.3 ± 10.1 | 0.123 |
| AST (U/L) | 27.2 ±29.6 | 20.5 ± 7.6 | 0.054 |
| TSH (mIU/L) | 22.9 ± 26.4 | 4.1 ± 3 | < 0.001 |
| FT4 (ng/dL) | 1 ± 0.3 | 1.2 ± 0.2 | < 0.001 |
| Total cholesterol (mg/dL) | 191.8 ± 40.2 | 168.4 ± 39.4 | < 0.001 |
| High density lipoprotein (mg/dL) | 48.7 ± 11.6 | 48.4 ± 17.1 | 0.892 |
| Low density lipoprotein (mg/dL) | 118.3 ± 32.1 | 102.4 ± 39.3 | 0.009 |
| Triglycerides (mg/dL, median (range) | 106 (33-356) | 76 (31-344) | < 0.001 |
Table 6 Correlation between thyroid stimulating hormone and other laboratory and imaging parameters
| Variable | TSH (mIU/L) | Degree of correlation | |
| r | P value | ||
| Age (years) | -0.12 | 0.163 | Non-significant correlation |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 0.08 | 0.348 | Non-significant correlation |
| ALT (U/L) | 0.12 | 0.164 | Non-significant correlation |
| AST (U/L) | 0.23 | 0.006 | Significant little positive correlation |
| Total cholesterol (mg/dL) | 0.38 | < 0.001 | Significant fair positive correlation |
| Triglycerides (mg/dL) | 0.24 | 0.004 | Significant little positive correlation |
| HDL (mg/dL) | 0.13 | 0.131 | Non-significant correlation |
| LDL (mg/dL) | 0.33 | < 0.001 | Significant fair positive correlation |
| Fib4 score | 0.26 | 0.168 | Non-significant correlation |
| HF% | 0.69 | < 0.001 | Significant good positive correlation |
Table 7 The degree of steatosis among the three groups by ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging, n (%)
| Variable | Overt hypothyroidism (A) | Subclinical hypothyroidism (B) | Control (C) | P value |
| Sonar | ||||
| Mild MASLD | 14 (40) | 17 (63) | 3 (100) | 0.046 |
| Moderate MASLD | 21 (60) | 10 (37) | 0 (0) | |
| Degree by MRI | ||||
| Mild MASLD | 13 (38.2) | 17 (63) | 3 (100) | 0.029 |
| Moderate MASLD | 21 (61.8) | 10 (37) | 0 (0) | |
Table 8 Comparing demographic and laboratory characteristics among the mild and moderate metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease groups, mean ± SD
| Variable | Mild MASLD | Moderate MASLD | P value |
| Age (years) | 36 ± 9 | 36 ± 9 | 0.940 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 31 ± 2 | 31.7 ± 2.3 | 0.238 |
| Duration of hypothyroidism (years) | 4.2 ± 1.6 | 4.3 ± 2 | 0.821 |
| ALT (U/L) | 19.2 ± 8.1 | 42.1 ± 79.6 | 0.106 |
| AST (U/L) | 20.5 ± 5.3 | 34.2 ± 41.4 | 0.065 |
| TSH (mIU/L) | 13.8 ± 16.1 | 32.6 ± 31.5 | 0.005 |
| FT4 (ng/dL) | 1 ± 0.2 | 0.9 ± 0.4 | 0.039 |
| Total cholesterol (mg/dL) | 186.2 ± 32.4 | 197.7 ± 47 | 0.253 |
| High density lipoprotein (mg/dL) | 48.8 ± 10.4 | 48.5 ± 13 | 0.919 |
| Low density lipoprotein (mg/dL) | 114.2 ± 25.8 | 122.6 ± 37.7 | 0.299 |
| HF (%) | 15.9 ± 7.8 | 30.8 ± 3.5 | < 0.001 |
| Triglycerides (mg/dL), median (range) | 105 (39-322) | 107 (33-356) | 0.777 |
| Fib4 score, median (range) | 0.3 (0.1-0.8) | 0.3 (0.1-0.7) | 0.438 |
Table 9 Thyroid stimulating hormone level correlation to steatosis grading by ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging
| Variable | TSH (mIU/L) | Paire-wise comparison | |
| mean ± SD | P value | ||
| Ultrasound | |||
| Non-MASLD (A) | 4.1 ± 3 | < 0.001 | A vs B: 0.023 |
| Mild MASLD (B) | 13.4 ± 16 | A vs C: < 0.001 | |
| Moderate MASLD (C) | 32.6 ± 31.5 | B vs C: < 0.001 | |
| Degree by MRI | |||
| Non-MASLD | 4.1 ± 3 | < 0.001 | A vs B: 0.017 |
| Mild MASLD | 13.8 ± 16.1 | A vs C: < 0.001 | |
| Moderate MASLD | 32.6 ± 31.5 | B vs C: < 0.001 | |
Table 10 The variables that were significant in the stepwise logistic regression
| Variable | B | SE | OR | 95%CI for OR | P value |
| TSH (mIU/L) | 0.2 | 0.1 | 1.18 | 1.04-1.33 | 0.010 |
Table 11 The variable that was significant in the stepwise logistic regression
| Variable | B | SE | OR | 95%CI for OR | P value |
| TSH (mIU/L) | 0.03 | 0.01 | 1.04 | 1.01-1.06 | 0.011 |
Table 12 Receiver-operating characteristic curve, with sensitivity 83% and specifity 89%, showing thyroid-stimulating hormone > 6.1 (mIU/L) is associated with a higher risk of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease development
| Variable | Cut-off point | Sensitivity (%) | Specificity (%) | PPV (%) | NPV (%) | AUC | 95%CI for AUC | P value |
| TSH (mIU/L) | > 6.1 | 83 | 89 | 86 | 87 | 0.88 | 0.82-0.93 | < 0.001 |
- Citation: Sholkamy A, El-Meligui A, H Saad E, Amin S, Makram M, Elmansy N, Mousa S. Association between overt, subclinical hypothyroidism and metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease using magnetic resonance imaging. World J Hepatol 2026; 18(5): 117441
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5182/full/v18/i5/117441.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4254/wjh.v18.i5.117441