Copyright
©The Author(s) 2026.
World J Hepatol. Jan 27, 2026; 18(1): 111534
Published online Jan 27, 2026. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v18.i1.111534
Published online Jan 27, 2026. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v18.i1.111534
Table 1 Steatotic liver disease nomenclature
| Nomenclature | Definition |
| NAFLD | Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease is defined by the presence of ≥ 5% of macrovesicular steatosis and the absence of an identified alternative diagnosis, as well as a significant ongoing or recent alcohol consumption (defined as < 30 g/day for men and < 20 g/day for women) |
| NASH | Presence of inflammation and cellular injury expressed by ballooning |
| MAFLD | Presence of steatosis evidenced by histology, imaging, or blood biomarker in addition to one of the following criteria: Overweight/obesity, type 2 diabetes mellitus, or evidence of metabolic syndrome |
| SLD | Presence of steatosis diagnosed histologically or by imaging techniques |
| MASLD | Presence of SLD associated with at least one cardiometabolic risk factor and no other identified cause, alcohol consumption should be less than 20 g/day for women and 30 g/day for men, previously called NAFLD |
| MASH | Presence of MASLD and cellular inflammation and/or injury, previously mentioned as NASH |
| Met-ALD | Met-ALD was recently proposed, defined as the presence of SLD and alcohol consumption between 20-50 g/day in women and 30-60 g/day in men |
Table 2 Parameters for noninvasive assessment of advanced fibrosis in metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease
| NIM | Rule-in cutoff | Rule-out cutoff | AUROC1 | Strengths and limitations |
| Biomarkers | ||||
| APRI | < 0.5 | > 1.5 | 0.74 | False positive in patients with alternative causes of thrombocytopenia |
| FIB-4 | < 1.32; < 1.67 | ≥ 2.67; ≥ 3.483 | 0.84 | No added cost; low accuracy in patients younger than 35 years; low specificity in those older than 65 years |
| NFS | < -1.44 | ≥ 0.672 | 0.82 | No added cost; not accurate in age < 35 years, people with obesity and type 2 diabetes Restricted use to MASLD |
| ELF | < 7.7; < 7.73 | ≥ 9.8; ≥ 11.33 | 0.83 | Cost and not widely available; less useful for early fibrosis |
| Imaging techniques | ||||
| VCTE | < 8 kPa; < 8 kPa3 | ≥ 12 kPa; ≥ 20 kPa3 | 0.9 | Point of care, possibility of steatosis degree evaluation; necessity of specific device; confounded by active hepatitis, food intake, congestive heart failure, biliary obstruction, amyloidosis, ascites; less applicable and reliable in severe obesity (especially with M probe) |
| pSWE (ARFI) | < 1.3 m/second | > 2.1 m/second | 0.8-0.9 | Integration into conventional ultrasound systems, which enables a comprehensive evaluation of the liver at the same time; cut points not well validated; Probably affected by the same confounders as VCTE, though the success rate is higher than VCTE in obese patients |
| 2D-SWE | < 8 kPa | > 12 kPa | 0.80-0.98 | Integration into conventional ultrasound systems, which enables a comprehensive evaluation of the liver at the same time; cut points not well validated; probably affected by the same confounders as VCTE |
| MRE | < 2.55 kPa; < 3 kPa3 | ≥ 3.63kPa; ≥ 5 kPa3 | 0.89-0.96 | Superior performance in detecting early-stage fibrosis; integration into routine liver MRI allows both fibrosis staging and surveillance of other liver pathologies, such as HCC; cost, not widely available; probably affected by the same confounders as VCTE and iron content; some patients may have contraindications to magnetic resonance imaging or have claustrophobia |
- Citation: Ribeiro TCR, de Paula Boechat Soares V, Campos Fabri J, de Aragão Ramos LE. Noninvasive liver fibrosis assessment in metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease. World J Hepatol 2026; 18(1): 111534
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5182/full/v18/i1/111534.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4254/wjh.v18.i1.111534
