Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Hepatol. Sep 27, 2025; 17(9): 109179
Published online Sep 27, 2025. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v17.i9.109179
Published online Sep 27, 2025. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v17.i9.109179
Table 1 Baseline characteristics of the study participants, n (%)/mean ± SD/median (interquartile range)
Characteristic, n = 153 | Finding |
Male | 123 (80.4) |
Age (years) | 56.3 ± 10.9 |
AST (U/L) | 93.2 (49.4-149.5) |
ALT (U/L) | 48.0 (30.2-82.9) |
Total bilirubin (μmol/L) | 41.8 (20.7-69.8) |
Albumin (g/L) | 27.1 (22.0-33.1) |
Hemoglobin (g/L) | 111.0 (94.0-124.0) |
Platelet as × 109/L | 94.0 (59.0-145.0) |
AFP (ng/Ml) | 4.66 (2.4-13.0) |
Child-Pugh | |
A | 22 (14.4) |
B | 64 (41.8) |
C | 67 (43.8) |
M2BPGi C.O.I. | 7.1 ± 3.7 |
FibroScan in kPa, n = 77 | 36.4 ± 20.5 |
Table 2 Serum mac-2 binding protein glycosylation isomer according to the degree of cirrhosis, esophageal varices, and with or without hepatocellular carcinoma, mean ± SD
Characteristic | n | M2BPGi C.O.I. | P value1 |
Child-Pugh | |||
A | 22 | 5.20 ± 2.65 | < 0.001 |
B | 64 | 6.14 ± 2.89 | |
C | 67 | 8.63 ± 4.08 | |
MELD score | |||
≤ 9 | 38 | 6.09 | 0.003 |
10-19 | 53 | 6.43 | |
20-29 | 39 | 7.85 | |
30–39 | 10 | 10.02 | |
≥ 40 | 7 | 11.11 | |
Esophageal varices | |||
F0 | 22 | 5.3 ± 4.3 | < 0.05 |
F1 | 10 | 5.0 ± 3.8 | |
FII | 21 | 7.6 ± 3.4 | |
FIII | 57 | 8.1 ± 3.8 | |
HCC | |||
Yes | 28 | 8.8 ± 2.9 | < 0.05 |
No | 125 | 6.7 ± 3.8 |
Table 3 Univariate logistic regression and multivariate logistic regression in prediction of liver decompensation and esophageal varices
Variable | Univariate analysis | Multivariate analysis | ||
OR | 95%CI | aOR | 95%CI | |
Liver decompensation | ||||
MELD score | 1.19 | 1.10-1.32 | 1.18 | 1.04-1.41 |
M2BPGi | 1.23 | 1.06-1.47 | 2.11 | 1.37-3.83 |
FibroScan | 1.06 | 1.02-1.12 | 1.05 | 0.98-1.15 |
AAR | 1.80 | 1.06-3.48 | 4.12 | 0.84-35.8 |
Esophageal varices | ||||
Platelets | 0.99 | 0.99-1.00 | 1.00 | 0.99-1.02 |
FibroScan | 0.99 | 0.97-1.02 | 0.98 | 0.95-1.00 |
M2BPGi | 1.10 | 1.01-1.22 | 1.30 | 1.08-1.64 |
AAR | 1.02 | 0.78-1.36 | 1.04 | 0.62-1.69 |
Child-Pugh | ||||
A | Reference | Reference | ||
B | 4.75 | 1.70-14.80 | 4.65 | 1.06-24.11 |
C | 4.21 | 1.52-13.01 | 1.90 | 0.32-11.90 |
- Citation: Doan TH, Nguyen KM, Nguyen XV, Pham ATN, Le ND. Evaluating thresholds of Mac-2 binding protein glycosylation isomer in association with clinical outcomes in patients with cirrhosis. World J Hepatol 2025; 17(9): 109179
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5182/full/v17/i9/109179.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4254/wjh.v17.i9.109179