BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Minireviews
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Hepatol. Sep 27, 2025; 17(9): 108144
Published online Sep 27, 2025. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v17.i9.108144
Table 1 Fibrosis reduction in patients with fatty liver disease undergoing metabolic bariatric procedures1
Ref.
Study design
Population
Intervention
Key findings
Abad et al[12], 2024Multicenter, randomized, clinical trial40 patients with MASHESG with lifestyle modification vs sham endoscopy with lifestyle interventionThe ESG group achieved significantly greater total body weight loss (9.47% vs 3.91%) and a greater reduction in liver stiffness (5.63 vs 0.2 kPa, both P < 0.05)
Hajifathalian et al[15], 2021Prospective, single-arm interventional study118 patients with obesity and MASLD or MASHESG ESG reduced hepatic fibrosis risk in 20% of patients, shifting VCTE elastography readings from F3–F4 to F0–F2, while only 1% worsened (P = 0.02)
Nunes et al[28], 2023Systematic review and meta-analysis175 patients with obesity and MASLD Four studies: ESGSgnificantly reduced hepatic steatosis index (–4.85, 95%CI –6.02 to –3.67), NFS (–0.5, 95%CI –0.80 to –0.19), TWL (–17.28%, 95%CI –18.24 to –16.31)
Jirapinyo et al[29], 2022Systematic review and meta-analysisStudy sample sizes ranged from 21 to 29 patients with obesity and MASLDOne study ESG; One study IGBEBMTs significantly reduced liver fibrosis (SMD 0.7, 95%CI: 0.1–1.3, P = 0.02), hepatic steatosis (SMD –1.0, 95%CI: –1.2 to –0.8, P < 0.0001) and NAS (–2.50, 95%CI: –3.5 to –1.5, P < 0.0001)
Salomone et al[18], 2021Retrospective study26 patients with obesity and MASH (liver stiffness ≥ 9.7 kPa at baseline)IGBFIB-4 decreased from 3.2 ± 0.7 to 2.7 ± 0.8, liver stiffness from 13.3 ± 3.2 to 11.3 ± 2.8 kPa, and CAP from 355 (298–400) to 296 (255–352) dB/m (all P < 0.01); no severe adverse events
Ren et al[30], 2022Systematic review and meta-analysisStudy sample sizes ranged from 21 to 91
patients with obesity and MASLD or MASH
Two studies: IGB; One study DJBLNFS decreased by –0.58 (95%CI –0.97 to –0.20), APRI lowered by 0.73 (P = 0.005) and MRE stiffness by 0.3 kPa (P = 0.03); VCTE elastography (–6.39 kPa) and FIB-4 (–0.28) changes were non-significant
Roehlen et al[21], 2022Prospective interventional study71 patients with T2DM, obesity and MASLDDJBLSignificantly reduced fatty liver index (from 98.22 to 93.38, P < 0.001), NFS (from 0.19 to –0.83, P < 0.001), and APRI (from 0.36 to 0.26, P < 0.0001)
Karlas et al[22], 2022Retrospective study32 T2D patients with obesity undergoing DJBLDJBLReduced FAST score by 0.21 (95%CI: –0.28 to –0.13, P < 0.001); fibrosis markers (LSM, NFS, ELF) were unchanged, with slight FIB4 improvement; device-related complications were noted
Chuang et al[19], 2023Systematic review and meta-analysis67 patients with obesity and MASLD or MASH (biopsy-proven or MRI-PDFF > 5%)Two studies: DMR Trend toward reduced liver fat (MRI-PDFF decreased by –2.22, 95%), though results were not statistically significant (P > 0.05)
Jirapinyo et al[17], 2024Retrospective study from a prospectively collected registry30 patients with obesity and MASLD12 patients received EGR monotherapy, 18 patients received EGR+GLP-1RACombination therapy led to significantly greater fibrosis improvement: NFS decreased by 181% ± 182% vs 30% ± 83% (P = 0.04), and liver stiffness reduced by 54% ± 12% vs 14% ± 45% (P = 0.05)